• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

依那普利每日一次20毫克与每日两次10毫克在降低血压及患者依从性方面的比较。

A comparison of enalapril 20 mg once daily versus 10 mg twice daily in terms of blood pressure lowering and patient compliance.

作者信息

Girvin B, McDermott B J, Johnston G D

机构信息

Department of Therapeutics and Pharmacology, The Queen's University of Belfast, UK.

出版信息

J Hypertens. 1999 Nov;17(11):1627-31. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199917110-00017.

DOI:10.1097/00004872-199917110-00017
PMID:10608477
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare enalapril 20 mg once daily with 10 mg twice daily in terms of blood pressure reduction and patient compliance.

DESIGN

Cross-over study of patients randomly assigned to a sequence of enalapril 20 mg once daily or 10 mg twice daily in three 4-week periods following a 4-week placebo run-in.

SETTING

General practices in the greater Belfast and Lisburn area in Northern Ireland.

PATIENTS

Twenty-five hypertensive patients who had a mean diastolic blood pressure of between 90 and 110 mm Hg after receiving placebo for 4 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Reduction in blood pressure and estimation of patient compliance.

RESULTS

Patient compliance was superior on the once daily regimen. However, the twice daily regimen was associated with a greater blood pressure reduction which almost reached statistical significance at the 5% level.

CONCLUSIONS

Enalapril 20 mg should be prescribed as 10 mg twice daily and measures taken to improve patient compliance.

摘要

目的

比较每日一次服用20毫克依那普利与每日两次服用10毫克依那普利在降低血压及患者依从性方面的效果。

设计

在为期4周的安慰剂导入期后,对患者进行交叉研究,患者被随机分配至三个为期4周的阶段,分别接受每日一次20毫克依那普利或每日两次10毫克依那普利的治疗。

地点

北爱尔兰大贝尔法斯特和利斯本地区的普通诊所。

患者

25名高血压患者,在接受4周安慰剂治疗后,平均舒张压在90至110毫米汞柱之间。

主要观察指标

血压降低情况及患者依从性评估。

结果

每日一次给药方案的患者依从性更佳。然而,每日两次给药方案与更大程度的血压降低相关,在5%的水平上几乎达到统计学显著性。

结论

依那普利20毫克应开为每日两次,每次10毫克,并采取措施提高患者依从性。

相似文献

1
A comparison of enalapril 20 mg once daily versus 10 mg twice daily in terms of blood pressure lowering and patient compliance.依那普利每日一次20毫克与每日两次10毫克在降低血压及患者依从性方面的比较。
J Hypertens. 1999 Nov;17(11):1627-31. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199917110-00017.
2
Manidipine versus enalapril monotherapy in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, 24-week study.马尼地平与依那普利单药治疗高血压合并2型糖尿病患者的多中心、随机、双盲、24周研究。
Clin Ther. 2005 Feb;27(2):166-73. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.02.001.
3
Efficacy and safety of telmisartan, a selective AT1 receptor antagonist, compared with enalapril in elderly patients with primary hypertension. TEES Study Group.与依那普利相比,选择性AT1受体拮抗剂替米沙坦在老年原发性高血压患者中的疗效和安全性。TEES研究组。
J Hypertens. 1999 Feb;17(2):293-302. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199917020-00015.
4
Differential effects of a missed dose of trandolapril and enalapril on blood pressure control in hypertensive patients.高血压患者漏服一剂群多普利和依那普利对血压控制的不同影响。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1995 Jul;26(1):127-31. doi: 10.1097/00005344-199507000-00020.
5
Effectiveness of blood pressure control with once daily administration of enalapril and perindopril.每日一次服用依那普利和培哚普利控制血压的有效性。
Am J Hypertens. 1994 Apr;7(4 Pt 1):371-3. doi: 10.1093/ajh/7.4.371.
6
Placebo-controlled comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of once-daily moxonidine and enalapril in mild-to-moderate essential hypertension.安慰剂对照比较每日一次莫索尼定和依那普利治疗轻至中度原发性高血压的疗效和耐受性。
J Hypertens. 1997 Jan;15(1):93-7. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199715010-00010.
7
Renal response to the angiotensin II receptor subtype 1 antagonist irbesartan versus enalapril in hypertensive patients.高血压患者中肾对血管紧张素II 1型受体拮抗剂厄贝沙坦与依那普利的反应
J Hypertens. 1998 Mar;16(3):385-93. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199816030-00016.
8
Electronic pill-boxes in the evaluation of antihypertensive treatment compliance: comparison of once daily versus twice daily regimen.电子药盒在评估降压治疗依从性中的应用:每日一次与每日两次治疗方案的比较
Am J Hypertens. 2000 Feb;13(2):184-90. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(99)00175-2.
9
[Ambulatory monitoring of arterial pressure in the treatment of mild-moderate arterial hypertension with lisinopril vs. enalapril].赖诺普利与依那普利治疗轻中度动脉高血压时的动态血压监测
Arch Inst Cardiol Mex. 1997 Jan-Feb;67(1):29-37.
10
Twenty-four hour blood pressure effect of once-daily lisinopril, enalapril, and placebo in patients with mild to moderate hypertension.赖诺普利、依那普利及安慰剂每日一次给药对轻至中度高血压患者24小时血压的影响
J Hum Hypertens. 1992 Aug;6(4):325-31.

引用本文的文献

1
Antihypertensive and Statin Medication Adherence Among Medicare Beneficiaries.医疗保险受益人群的抗高血压和他汀类药物用药依从性。
Am J Prev Med. 2022 Sep;63(3):313-323. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2022.02.019. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
2
Once- Versus Twice-Daily Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors for Blood Pressure Control in Adult Patients With Hypertension.一日一次与一日两次服用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂对成年高血压患者血压控制的效果比较
Cureus. 2021 Aug 20;13(8):e17331. doi: 10.7759/cureus.17331. eCollection 2021 Aug.
3
Twice-daily versus once-daily lisinopril and losartan for hypertension: Real-world effectiveness and safety.
替米沙坦联合培哚普利与缬沙坦联合培哚普利治疗原发性高血压的疗效比较:一项基于电子病历的回顾性队列研究
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 3;15(12):e0243371. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243371. eCollection 2020.
4
Impact of a Patient-Centered Behavioral Economics Intervention on Hypertension Control in a Highly Disadvantaged Population: a Randomized Trial.以患者为中心的行为经济学干预对高度弱势群体高血压控制的影响:一项随机试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jan;35(1):70-78. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05269-z. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
5
Efficacy and safety of twice- vs once-daily dosing of lisinopril for hypertension.赖诺普利每日两次与每日一次给药治疗高血压的疗效及安全性
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2017 Sep;19(9):868-873. doi: 10.1111/jch.13011. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
6
Patient adherence to prescribed artemisinin-based combination therapy in Garissa County, Kenya, after three years of health care in a conflict setting.在肯尼亚加里萨县冲突环境下接受三年医疗保健后患者对规定的青蒿素联合疗法的依从性。
Malar J. 2015 Mar 24;14:125. doi: 10.1186/s12936-015-0645-z.
7
Interventions for enhancing medication adherence.提高药物依从性的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 20;2014(11):CD000011. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000011.pub4.
8
Characterizing weekly self-reported antihypertensive medication nonadherence across repeated occasions.描述多次重复情况下每周自我报告的抗高血压药物治疗依从性不佳情况。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014 May 7;8:643-50. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S60715. eCollection 2014.
9
Impact of reducing dosing frequency on adherence to oral therapies: a literature review and meta-analysis.降低给药频率对口服治疗依从性的影响:一项文献综述与荟萃分析。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2013 May 20;7:419-34. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S44646. Print 2013.
10
Health expenditure comparison of extended-release metoprolol succinate and immediate-release metoprolol tartarate.琥珀酸美托洛尔缓释片与酒石酸美托洛尔片的健康支出比较。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2012;4:49-56. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S27609. Epub 2012 Feb 7.