Fischhoff B, Millstein SG, Halpern-Felsher BL
Department of Social and Decision Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2000 Jan;81(1):115-131. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1999.2868.
When estimating risks, people may use "50" as an expression of the verbal phrase "fifty-fifty chance," without intending the associated number of 50%. The result is an excess of 50s in the response distribution. The present study examined factors determining the magnitude of such a "50 blip," using a large sample of adolescents and adults. We found that phrasing probability questions in a distributional format (asking about risks as a percentage in a population) rather than in a singular format (asking about risks to an individual) reduced the use of "50." Less numerate respondents, children, and less educated adults were more likely to say "50." Finally, events that evoked feelings of less perceived control led to more 50s. The results are discussed in terms of what they reveal about how people express epistemic uncertainty. Copyright 2000 Academic Press.
在估计风险时,人们可能会用“50”来表达“五五开的机会”这个口头短语,而并非指与之相关的50%这个数字。结果是在回答分布中出现了过多的50。本研究使用大量青少年和成年人样本,考察了决定这种“50峰值”大小的因素。我们发现,以分布形式(询问作为总体中百分比的风险)而非单一形式(询问个体的风险)来表述概率问题,会减少“50”的使用。算术能力较差的受访者、儿童以及受教育程度较低的成年人更有可能说“50”。最后,引发较少控制感的事件会导致更多的50出现。我们根据这些结果揭示的人们如何表达认知不确定性进行了讨论。版权所有2000年学术出版社。