Howard P A
Department of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City 66160-7231, USA.
Drugs. 1999 Dec;58(6):997-1009. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199958060-00004.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major independent risk factor for stroke. AF is most commonly associated with nonvalvular cardiovascular disease and is especially frequent among the elderly. The annual risk for stroke in patients with AF is approximately 5% with a wide range depending on the presence of additional risk factors. For patients who cannot successfully be converted and maintained in normal sinus rhythm (NSR), antithrombotic therapy is an effective method for preventing stroke. The 2 drugs which are indicated for stroke prophylaxis in patients with AF are warfarin and aspirin. For primary prevention, warfarin reduces the risk of stroke approximately 68%. Aspirin therapy is less effective, resulting in a 20 to 30% risk reduction. Combination therapy with aspirin and low intensity warfarin adjusted to an International Normalised Ratio (INR) of 1.2 to 1.5 has not been shown to be superior to standard intensity warfarin with a target INR of 2.0 to 3.0. In patients with AF and a prior history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA), the absolute risk reduction with warfarin is even greater because of the high risk of stroke in this population. In contrast, aspirin has not been shown to significantly reduce the risk of stroke in patients with AF when used for secondary prevention. When appropriately managed, warfarin is associated with a low risk of major bleeding. In controlled trials of highly selected patients, the annual rate of intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) with warfarin was approximately 0.3%. Studies have shown that specialty anticoagulation clinics can achieve similar low rates of major bleeding. However, these results cannot be extrapolated to the general population. Factors which have been identified as predictors of bleeding include advanced age, number of medications and most importantly, the intensity of anticoagulation. INR values above 4.0 have been associated with an increased risk of major bleeding while values below 2.0 have been associated with thrombosis. Slow careful dosage titration, regular laboratory monitoring and patient education can substantially reduce the risk of complications. In patients with AF, antithrombotic therapy has been shown to be cost effective. For high risk patients, warfarin is the most cost-effective therapy, provided the risks for bleeding are minimised. In contrast, aspirin is the most cost-effective agent for low risk patients. Current practice guidelines for stroke prophylaxis recommend warfarin (target INR 2.5: range 2.0 to 3.0) for AF patients at high risk for stroke including those over 75 years of age or younger patients with additional risk factors. Aspirin should be reserved for low risk patients or those unable to take warfarin. Although these recommendations are strongly supported by the clinical trial evidence, studies show that many patients are not receiving appropriate antithrombotic therapy. In particular, warfarin is underutilised in high risk elderly patients. Additional studies are needed to identify barriers that prevent implementation of the clinical trial findings into clinical practice.
心房颤动(AF)是中风的主要独立危险因素。AF最常与非瓣膜性心血管疾病相关,在老年人中尤为常见。AF患者的年中风风险约为5%,因其他危险因素的存在而有很大差异。对于无法成功转为并维持正常窦性心律(NSR)的患者,抗血栓治疗是预防中风的有效方法。用于AF患者中风预防的两种药物是华法林和阿司匹林。对于一级预防,华法林可将中风风险降低约68%。阿司匹林治疗效果较差,只能降低20%至30%的风险。阿司匹林与低强度华法林(国际标准化比值[INR]调整为1.2至1.5)联合治疗并未显示优于目标INR为2.0至3.0的标准强度华法林。对于有中风或短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)病史的AF患者,由于该人群中风风险高,华法林的绝对风险降低幅度更大。相比之下,阿司匹林用于二级预防时,并未显示能显著降低AF患者的中风风险。若管理得当,华法林导致大出血的风险较低。在高度选择的患者的对照试验中,华法林导致的年度颅内出血(ICH)发生率约为0.3%。研究表明,专科抗凝门诊也能实现类似的低大出血发生率。然而,这些结果不能外推至普通人群。已确定的出血预测因素包括高龄、用药数量,最重要的是抗凝强度。INR值高于4.0与大出血风险增加相关,而低于2.0与血栓形成相关。缓慢谨慎地调整剂量、定期实验室监测和患者教育可大幅降低并发症风险。在AF患者中,抗血栓治疗已被证明具有成本效益。对于高危患者,华法林是最具成本效益的治疗方法,前提是将出血风险降至最低。相比之下,阿司匹林是低危患者最具成本效益的药物。当前的中风预防实践指南建议,对于中风高危的AF患者,包括75岁以上或有其他危险因素的年轻患者,使用华法林(目标INR 2.5:范围2.0至3.0)。阿司匹林应保留给低危患者或无法服用华法林的患者。尽管这些建议得到了临床试验证据的有力支持,但研究表明,许多患者未接受适当的抗血栓治疗。特别是,华法林在高危老年患者中未得到充分利用。需要进一步研究以确定阻碍将临床试验结果应用于临床实践的障碍。