Suppr超能文献

固定小剂量华法林与阿司匹林单用及联合使用对比调整剂量华法林用于心房颤动患者预防卒中:第二次哥本哈根心房颤动、阿司匹林及抗凝治疗研究

Fixed minidose warfarin and aspirin alone and in combination vs adjusted-dose warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: Second Copenhagen Atrial Fibrillation, Aspirin, and Anticoagulation Study.

作者信息

Gulløv A L, Koefoed B G, Petersen P, Pedersen T S, Andersen E D, Godtfredsen J, Boysen G

机构信息

Copenhagen General Practitioners Laboratory, Denmark.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 1998 Jul 27;158(14):1513-21. doi: 10.1001/archinte.158.14.1513.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the efficacy of warfarin sodium therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation, many physicians hesitate to prescribe it to elderly patients because of the risk for bleeding complications and because of inconvenience for the patients.

METHODS

The Second Copenhagen Atrial Fibrillation, Aspirin, and Anticoagulation Study was a randomized, controlled trial examining the following therapies: warfarin sodium, 1.25 mg/d; warfarin sodium, 1.25 mg/d, plus aspirin, 300 mg/d; and aspirin, 300 mg/d. These were compared with adjusted-dose warfarin therapy (international normalized ratio of prothrombin time [INR], 2.0-3.0). Stroke or a systemic thromboembolic event was the primary outcome event. Transient ischemic attack, acute myocardial infarction, and death were secondary events. Data were handled as survival data, and risk factors were identified using the Cox proportional hazards model. The trial was scheduled for 6 years from May 1, 1993, but due to scientific evidence of inefficiency of low-intensity warfarin plus aspirin therapy from another study, our trial was prematurely terminated on October 2, 1996.

RESULTS

We included 677 patients (median age, 74 years). The cumulative primary event rate after 1 year was 5.8% in patients receiving minidose warfarin; 7.2%, warfarin plus aspirin; 3.6%, aspirin; and 2.8%, adjusted-dose warfarin (P = .67). After 3 years, no difference among the groups was seen. Major bleeding events were rare.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the difference was insignificant, adjusted-dose warfarin seemed superior to minidose warfarin and to warfarin plus aspirin after 1 year of treatment. The results do not justify a change in the current recommendation of adjusted-dose warfarin (INR, 2.0-3.0) for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.

摘要

背景

尽管华法林钠疗法在预防房颤患者中风方面具有疗效,但许多医生因担心出血并发症风险以及患者不便,而不愿为老年患者开具此药。

方法

第二次哥本哈根房颤、阿司匹林与抗凝研究是一项随机对照试验,研究了以下疗法:华法林钠,每日1.25毫克;华法林钠每日1.25毫克加阿司匹林每日300毫克;以及阿司匹林每日300毫克。将这些疗法与调整剂量的华法林疗法(凝血酶原时间国际标准化比值[INR]为2.0 - 3.0)进行比较。中风或全身性血栓栓塞事件为主要结局事件。短暂性脑缺血发作、急性心肌梗死和死亡为次要事件。数据作为生存数据处理,并使用Cox比例风险模型识别风险因素。该试验计划从1993年5月1日起为期6年,但由于另一项研究表明低强度华法林加阿司匹林疗法无效的科学证据,我们的试验于1996年10月2日提前终止。

结果

我们纳入了677名患者(中位年龄74岁)。接受小剂量华法林治疗的患者1年后累积主要事件发生率为5.8%;华法林加阿司匹林组为7.2%;阿司匹林组为3.6%;调整剂量华法林组为2.8%(P = 0.67)。3年后,各治疗组之间未观察到差异。严重出血事件罕见。

结论

尽管差异不显著,但治疗1年后,调整剂量的华法林似乎优于小剂量华法林以及华法林加阿司匹林。这些结果并不支持改变目前关于调整剂量华法林(INR为2.0 - 3.0)预防房颤患者中风的推荐。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验