Sicherer S H, Forman J A, Noone S A
Division of Allergy and Immunology, Jaffe Food Allergy Institute, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York 10029-6574, USA.
Pediatrics. 2000 Feb;105(2):359-62. doi: 10.1542/peds.105.2.359.
Food allergy is a common cause of anaphylaxis, and early treatment with epinephrine can be life-saving. We sought to determine the ability of families with food allergic children and pediatricians to properly use self-injectable epinephrine.
We enrolled families of consecutive, food-allergic pediatric patients newly referred to our allergy practice but previously prescribed epinephrine and a sampling of pediatricians. Parents or teenage patients answered a structured questionnaire concerning use of self-injectable epinephrine and demonstrated the use of devices with which they were familiar. Demonstrations were scored in a standard manner.
One hundred one families of food-allergic children (mean age of patients, 6.4 years) were enrolled. Self-injectable epinephrine was prescribed (mean of 2.7 years previously) primarily by pediatricians (n = 46) and allergists (n = 49). Patients were prescribed EpiPen (n = 93), EpiE-Z Pen (n = 11), and Ana-Kit (n = 3). Eighty-six percent of the families responded that they had the device with them "at all times," but only 71% of this group had epinephrine at the visit. Among those with the epinephrine, 10% had devices beyond the labeled expiration date. Thus, only 55% of the 101 families had unexpired epinephrine on-hand at the time of the survey. Among children in school, 77% had the medication available in school, and 81% stated that the school knew the indications for administration. Only 32% of the participants correctly demonstrated the use of the device. Twenty-nine attending pediatricians were enrolled (mean 14 yrs in practice; mean 4 epinephrine prescriptions/year). Familiarity with the devices was as follows: EpiPen (86%), EpiE-Z Pen (17%) and Ana-Kit (7%). Only 24% generally gave patients written materials concerning indications. Overall, 18% were familiar with and able to demonstrate correct use of at least 1 device (21% correctly demonstrated Epi-Pen). Seventeen pediatric residents were enrolled; 65% were familiar with the EpiPen; 36% demonstrated it correctly and only 1 resident was familiar with Ana-Kit.
Many parents of severely food-allergic children, and food-allergic teenagers cannot correctly administer their self-injectable epinephrine and may not have the medication readily available. Pediatricians are not familiar with these devices and may fail to review their use with patients. Improved patient and physician education is needed to ensure proper use of this life-saving medication.
食物过敏是过敏反应的常见病因,早期使用肾上腺素治疗可挽救生命。我们试图确定食物过敏儿童家庭及儿科医生正确使用自动注射肾上腺素的能力。
我们招募了新转诊至我们过敏科、此前已开具肾上腺素处方的连续食物过敏儿科患者家庭以及一些儿科医生。家长或青少年患者回答了一份关于自动注射肾上腺素使用情况的结构化问卷,并演示了他们所熟悉设备的使用方法。演示按标准方式评分。
招募了101个食物过敏儿童家庭(患者平均年龄6.4岁)。自动注射肾上腺素主要由儿科医生(46名)和过敏症专科医生(49名)开具(平均在2.7年前)。给患者开具的有EpiPen(93支)、EpiE - Z Pen(11支)和Ana - Kit(3支)。86%的家庭表示他们“随时”携带该设备,但该组中只有71%的家庭在就诊时携带了肾上腺素。在携带肾上腺素的家庭中,10%的设备超过了标签上的有效期。因此,在调查时,101个家庭中只有55%的家庭手头有未过期的肾上腺素。在上学的儿童中,77%的儿童在学校备有该药物,81%的儿童表示学校知道用药指征。只有32%的参与者正确演示了设备的使用方法。招募了29名儿科主治医师(平均从业14年;平均每年开具4份肾上腺素处方)。对设备的熟悉程度如下:EpiPen(86%)、EpiE - Z Pen(17%)和Ana - Kit(7%)。只有24%的医生通常会给患者提供关于用药指征的书面材料。总体而言,18%的医生熟悉并能够演示至少一种设备的正确使用方法(21%的医生正确演示了EpiPen)。招募了17名儿科住院医师;65%的住院医师熟悉EpiPen;36%的住院医师正确演示了其使用方法,只有1名住院医师熟悉Ana - Kit。
许多重度食物过敏儿童的家长以及食物过敏的青少年不能正确使用自动注射肾上腺素,且可能无法随时获得该药物。儿科医生不熟悉这些设备,可能未与患者一起复习其使用方法。需要加强对患者和医生的教育,以确保正确使用这种救命药物。