Suppr超能文献

一项基于大学的无烟运动的短期影响。

Short-term impact of a university based smoke free campaign.

作者信息

Etter J F, Ronchi A, Perneger T

机构信息

Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999 Nov;53(11):710-5. doi: 10.1136/jech.53.11.710.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a smoke free programme implemented at the University of Geneva, Switzerland, in 1996. This programme included a prohibition to smoke in university buildings everywhere except in limited areas, and a smoking cessation counselling service.

METHODS

Surveys were conducted before and four months after the programme was implemented, in representative samples of programme participants (n = 833) and university members not exposed to the programme (n = 1023).

RESULTS

In retrospective assessments, participants reported being less bothered by environmental tobacco smoke after programme implementation, but no between group difference was detected in prospective assessments. Relationships between smokers and non-smokers improved moderately in the intervention group and remained unchanged in the comparison group (between group p = 0.001). Proportions of smokers who attempted to quit smoking in the past four months increased from 2.0% to 3.8% in the intervention group and remained unchanged at 3.5% in the comparison group (between group difference: p = 0.048). No impact on smoking prevalence (25%) was detected. The programme was appreciated by university members, although some of its modalities were criticised.

CONCLUSION

A regulation prohibiting smoking everywhere but in limited areas of university buildings was acceptable and reduced the perception of bother by environmental tobacco smoke. It did not, however, influence smoking habits or attitudes toward smoking.

摘要

研究目的

本研究旨在评估1996年在瑞士日内瓦大学实施的无烟计划的影响。该计划包括除有限区域外禁止在大学建筑内吸烟,以及提供戒烟咨询服务。

方法

在该计划实施前及实施四个月后,对计划参与者的代表性样本(n = 833)和未参与该计划的大学成员(n = 1023)进行了调查。

结果

在回顾性评估中,参与者报告称计划实施后受环境烟草烟雾的困扰减少,但在前瞻性评估中未发现组间差异。干预组中吸烟者与非吸烟者之间的关系适度改善,而对照组则保持不变(组间p = 0.001)。在过去四个月中试图戒烟的吸烟者比例在干预组中从2.0%增至3.8%,在对照组中保持在3.5%不变(组间差异:p = 0.048)。未发现对吸烟率(25%)有影响。该计划受到大学成员的认可,尽管其某些方式受到批评。

结论

一项除大学建筑有限区域外禁止吸烟的规定是可以接受的,并减少了对环境烟草烟雾困扰的感知。然而,它并未影响吸烟习惯或对吸烟的态度。

相似文献

1
Short-term impact of a university based smoke free campaign.一项基于大学的无烟运动的短期影响。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999 Nov;53(11):710-5. doi: 10.1136/jech.53.11.710.
6
Attitudes Toward Smoke-Free Public Housing Among U.S. Adults, 2016.2016 年美国成年人对无烟公共住房的态度。
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Jan;54(1):113-118. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.08.026. Epub 2017 Nov 16.

引用本文的文献

3
Workplace interventions for smoking cessation.职场戒烟干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 26;2014(2):CD003440. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003440.pub4.
7
Preferred smoking policies at 30 Pacific Northwest colleges.太平洋西北地区30所学院的首选吸烟政策。
Public Health Rep. 2006 Sep-Oct;121(5):586-93. doi: 10.1177/003335490612100514.

本文引用的文献

2
Collecting saliva samples by mail.通过邮寄收集唾液样本。
Am J Epidemiol. 1998 Jan 15;147(2):141-6. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009426.
3
Analysis of non-response bias in a mailed health survey.邮寄式健康调查中的无应答偏差分析。
J Clin Epidemiol. 1997 Oct;50(10):1123-8. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(97)00166-2.
7
A meta-analysis of adolescent smoking prevention programs.青少年吸烟预防项目的荟萃分析。
Am J Public Health. 1993 Jun;83(6):872-80. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.6.872.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验