• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于胸部和腹部CT软拷贝解读的肝脏和骨骼窗设置。

Liver and bone window settings for soft-copy interpretation of chest and abdominal CT.

作者信息

Pomerantz S M, White C S, Krebs T L, Daly B, Sukumar S A, Hooper F, Siegel E L

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Maryland Medical System, Baltimore 21201, USA.

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Feb;174(2):311-4. doi: 10.2214/ajr.174.2.1740311.

DOI:10.2214/ajr.174.2.1740311
PMID:10658696
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated whether the use of multiple window and level settings on a soft-copy workstation improves diagnostic accuracy on chest and abdominal CT. We hypothesized that routinely using window and level settings during soft-copy interpretation would beneficially affect the final diagnosis without compromising efficiency.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two hundred three randomly selected abdominal and chest CT scans were interpreted by three radiologists using a four-monitor soft-copy workstation (images per screen, nine; resolution, 2K). After the initial interpretations, all scans were reevaluated by the same radiologists using additional liver and bone window and level settings. Differences in conspicuity and characterization of abnormalities were graded on a three-point scale.

RESULTS

Conspicuity and characterization of abnormalities were improved in 67% of abnormal findings (81/121; p = 0.01). Improvement (a finding that substantially affected the final diagnosis) was present in 18% of abnormal findings (22/121; p = 0.04). On average, the evaluation of images at multiple window and level settings required an additional 40 sec per case.

CONCLUSION

The use of multiple window and level settings during soft-copy interpretation resulted in improved lesion detectability and characterization with greater diagnostic efficacy. Using soft-copy workstations, radiologists can evaluate images using multiple settings without compromising efficiency.

摘要

目的

我们评估了在软拷贝工作站上使用多种窗宽和窗位设置是否能提高胸部和腹部CT的诊断准确性。我们假设在软拷贝解读过程中常规使用窗宽和窗位设置将对最终诊断产生有益影响,且不会降低效率。

材料与方法

三名放射科医生使用四显示器软拷贝工作站(每屏图像9幅;分辨率2K)对随机选取的203例腹部和胸部CT扫描进行解读。在初始解读后,所有扫描均由同一名放射科医生使用额外的肝脏和骨窗宽及窗位设置重新评估。异常的清晰度和特征差异按三分制分级。

结果

67%的异常发现(81/121;p = 0.01)的清晰度和特征得到改善。18%的异常发现(22/121;p = 0.04)存在改善(即对最终诊断有重大影响的发现)。平均而言,对多窗宽和窗位设置的图像进行评估,每例需要额外40秒。

结论

在软拷贝解读过程中使用多种窗宽和窗位设置可提高病变的可检测性和特征性,具有更高的诊断效能。使用软拷贝工作站,放射科医生可以在不降低效率的情况下使用多种设置评估图像。

相似文献

1
Liver and bone window settings for soft-copy interpretation of chest and abdominal CT.用于胸部和腹部CT软拷贝解读的肝脏和骨骼窗设置。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Feb;174(2):311-4. doi: 10.2214/ajr.174.2.1740311.
2
Accuracy of interpretation of CT scans: comparing PACS monitor displays and hard-copy images.CT扫描解读的准确性:比较PACS监视器显示与硬拷贝图像
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Dec;179(6):1407-10. doi: 10.2214/ajr.179.6.1791407.
3
Detecting hepatic lesions: the added utility of CT liver window settings.
Radiology. 1999 Mar;210(3):601-4. doi: 10.1148/radiology.210.3.r99mr07601.
4
CT of the chest and abdomen in patients on mechanical pulmonary ventilators: quality of images made at 0.6 vs 1.0 sec.接受机械通气患者的胸部和腹部CT:0.6秒与1.0秒扫描所得图像的质量
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994 Nov;163(5):1073-7. doi: 10.2214/ajr.163.5.7976877.
5
Radiation dose reduction with hybrid iterative reconstruction for pediatric CT.应用混合迭代重建降低儿科 CT 的辐射剂量。
Radiology. 2012 May;263(2):537-46. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12110268.
6
Sensitivity and Specificity of Emergency Physicians and Trainees for Identifying Internally Concealed Drug Packages on Abdominal Computed Tomography Scan: Do Lung Windows Improve Accuracy?急诊医师及实习医生在腹部计算机断层扫描中识别体内隐藏毒品包裹的敏感度和特异度:肺窗能否提高准确性?
J Emerg Med. 2015 Sep;49(3):268-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.02.009. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
7
Radiologists' productivity in the interpretation of CT scans: a comparison of PACS with conventional film.放射科医生解读CT扫描的工作效率:PACS与传统胶片的比较。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001 Apr;176(4):861-4. doi: 10.2214/ajr.176.4.1760861.
8
Acute stroke: improved nonenhanced CT detection--benefits of soft-copy interpretation by using variable window width and center level settings.急性中风:非增强CT检测的改进——通过使用可变窗宽和中心水平设置进行软拷贝解读的益处
Radiology. 1999 Oct;213(1):150-5. doi: 10.1148/radiology.213.1.r99oc10150.
9
Comparison of hard- and soft-copy digital chest images with different matrix sizes for managing coronary care unit patients.用于管理冠心病监护病房患者的不同矩阵大小的硬拷贝和软拷贝数字胸部图像的比较。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Apr;164(4):837-41. doi: 10.2214/ajr.164.4.7726034.
10
Impact of ambient light and window settings on the detectability of catheters on soft-copy display of chest radiographs at bedside.环境光和窗口设置对床边胸部X光片软拷贝显示上导管可检测性的影响。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 Nov;181(5):1415-21. doi: 10.2214/ajr.181.5.1811415.

引用本文的文献

1
Unified total body CT image with multiple organ specific windowings: validating improved diagnostic accuracy and speed in trauma cases.具有多器官特定窗宽的统一全身CT图像:验证创伤病例中提高的诊断准确性和速度。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 15;15(1):5654. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83346-y.
2
New liver window width in detecting hepatocellular carcinoma on dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography with deep learning reconstruction.基于深度学习重建的新肝脏窗宽在动态对比增强 CT 检测肝细胞癌中的应用。
Radiol Phys Technol. 2024 Sep;17(3):658-665. doi: 10.1007/s12194-024-00817-7. Epub 2024 Jun 5.
3
Rapid study assessment in follow-up whole-body computed tomography in patients with multiple myeloma using a dedicated bone subtraction software.
采用专用骨减影软件对多发性骨髓瘤患者进行随访全身 CT 的快速研究评估。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Jun;30(6):3198-3209. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06631-9. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
4
A machine learning model to predict hepatocellular carcinoma response to transcatheter arterial chemoembolization.一种预测肝细胞癌对经动脉化疗栓塞反应的机器学习模型。
Radiol Artif Intell. 2019 Sep;1(5). doi: 10.1148/ryai.2019180021. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
5
Stochastic tissue window normalization of deep learning on computed tomography.计算机断层扫描深度学习的随机组织窗口归一化
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2019 Oct;6(4):044005. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.6.4.044005. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
6
Large-scale medical image annotation with crowd-powered algorithms.利用众包算法进行大规模医学图像标注
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2018 Jul;5(3):034002. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.5.3.034002. Epub 2018 Sep 8.
7
Methods for optimizing the display conditions of brain magnetic resonance images.优化脑磁共振图像显示条件的方法。
Jpn J Radiol. 2017 Oct;35(10):622-627. doi: 10.1007/s11604-017-0669-0. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
8
Diagnostic errors when interpreting abdominopelvic computed tomography: a pictorial review.腹部盆腔计算机断层扫描解读中的诊断错误:图像综述
Br J Radiol. 2017 May;90(1073):20160928. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160928. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
9
Thoracic Temporal Subtraction Three Dimensional Computed Tomography (3D-CT): Screening for Vertebral Metastases of Primary Lung Cancers.胸部时间减影三维计算机断层扫描(3D-CT):原发性肺癌椎体转移的筛查
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 17;12(1):e0170309. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170309. eCollection 2017.
10
Bone Windows for Distinguishing Malignant from Benign Primary Bone Tumors on FDG PET/CT.骨窗对 FDG PET/CT 鉴别良恶性原发性骨肿瘤的价值
J Cancer. 2013 Aug 9;4(7):524-30. doi: 10.7150/jca.6259. eCollection 2013.