• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

文本连贯性和模态对元记忆判断的影响。

The effect of text coherence and modality on metamemory judgements.

作者信息

Carroll M, Korukina S

机构信息

University of Canberra, ACT, Australia.

出版信息

Memory. 1999 May;7(3):309-22. doi: 10.1080/096582199387940.

DOI:10.1080/096582199387940
PMID:10659080
Abstract

This study examined the effects of text coherence and modality on the metamemory judgements of Ease of Learning (EOL) and Judgement of Learning (JOL), and on the object-level measure of recall. Previous work found that sentence material set in a coherent, ordered text context was not judged as more memorable than that presented in a context of sentences in a disordered sequence, even though an ordered sequence helped recall (Shaddock & Carroll, 1997). The current study modified Shaddock and Carroll's design by changing the texts used from expository to narrative text. The metamemory judgements and recall were now found to be significantly more sensitive to material learned in an ordered sequence than to material learned in a disordered sequence. Also, JOLs and recall were more sensitive to material that was originally learned in an auditory mode (spoken presentation) than in a visual mode (verbal presentation). The results are discussed in terms of a cue-utilisation approach to metamemory judgements.

摘要

本研究考察了文本连贯性和模态对学习容易度(EOL)和学习判断(JOL)的元记忆判断,以及对回忆的对象层面测量的影响。先前的研究发现,置于连贯、有序文本语境中的句子材料,并不比以无序序列呈现的句子语境中的材料被判定为更易记忆,尽管有序序列有助于回忆(Shaddock & Carroll,1997)。本研究通过将所用文本从说明文改为记叙文,对Shaddock和Carroll的设计进行了修改。现在发现,元记忆判断和回忆对按有序序列学习的材料比对按无序序列学习的材料明显更敏感。此外,JOL和回忆对最初以听觉模式(口头呈现)学习的材料比以视觉模式(书面呈现)学习的材料更敏感。研究结果从元记忆判断的线索利用方法角度进行了讨论。

相似文献

1
The effect of text coherence and modality on metamemory judgements.文本连贯性和模态对元记忆判断的影响。
Memory. 1999 May;7(3):309-22. doi: 10.1080/096582199387940.
2
Memory, metamemory and their dissociation in temporal lobe epilepsy.颞叶癫痫中的记忆、元记忆及其分离。
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Mar;48(4):921-32. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.11.011. Epub 2009 Nov 22.
3
Processing and memory of information presented in narrative or expository texts.叙述性或说明性文本中信息的处理和记忆。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2010 Sep;80(Pt 3):341-62. doi: 10.1348/000709910X485700. Epub 2010 Feb 2.
4
Learning and memory of factual content from narrative and expository text.从叙述性和说明性文本中学习和记忆事实性内容。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2007 Sep;77(Pt 3):541-64. doi: 10.1348/000709906X143902.
5
The role of age of acquisition in memory: effects on judgements of learning and recall.习得年龄在记忆中的作用:对学习判断和回忆的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Sep;64(9):1665-71. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.591495. Epub 2011 Aug 15.
6
A revised methodology for research on metamemory: Pre-judgment Recall and Monitoring (PRAM).一种用于元记忆研究的修订方法:预判回忆与监控(PRAM)。
Psychol Methods. 2004 Mar;9(1):53-69. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.9.1.53.
7
Influence of cue word perceptual information on metamemory accuracy in judgement of learning.线索词知觉信息对学习判断中元记忆准确性的影响。
Memory. 2016;24(3):383-98. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2015.1009470. Epub 2015 Feb 16.
8
Metacomprehension judgements reflect the belief that diagrams improve learning from text.元理解判断反映了这样一种信念,即图表可以提高从文本中学习的效果。
Memory. 2010 Oct;18(7):698-711. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2010.506441. Epub 2010 Aug 19.
9
[Learning by using notes: recall and meta-recall in middle and advanced age].
Z Exp Angew Psychol. 1994;41(2):279-94.
10
Does the amount of material to be remembered influence judgements of learning (JOLs)?需要记忆的材料量是否会影响学习判断(JOL)?
Memory. 2010 Apr;18(3):351-62. doi: 10.1080/09658211003662755.

引用本文的文献

1
Telling a good story: The effects of memory retrieval and context processing on eyewitness suggestibility.讲述一个好故事:记忆检索和语境处理对目击证人证词易受影响性的影响。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 21;14(2):e0212592. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212592. eCollection 2019.
2
Intensifying the intensity illusion in judgments of learning: Modality and cue combinations.增强学习判断中的强度错觉:模态与线索组合
Mem Cognit. 2019 Apr;47(3):412-419. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0875-8.
3
Auditory presentation leads to better analogical retrieval than written presentation.
听觉呈现比书面呈现能带来更好的类比检索效果。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Dec;14(6):1101-6. doi: 10.3758/bf03193098.
4
Text cohesion and metacomprehension: immediate and delayed judgments.
Mem Cognit. 2004 Dec;32(8):1238-54. doi: 10.3758/bf03206315.