Suppr超能文献

呼吸治疗师启动的治疗方案对患者预后及资源利用的影响。

The effect of respiratory therapist-initiated treatment protocols on patient outcomes and resource utilization.

作者信息

Kollef M H, Shapiro S D, Clinkscale D, Cracchiolo L, Clayton D, Wilner R, Hossin L

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.

出版信息

Chest. 2000 Feb;117(2):467-75. doi: 10.1378/chest.117.2.467.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Physicians frequently prescribe respiratory treatments to hospitalized patients, but the influence of such treatments on clinical outcomes is difficult to assess.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical outcomes of patients receiving respiratory treatments managed by respiratory care practitioner (RCP)-directed treatment protocols or physician-directed orders.

DESIGN

A single center, quasi-randomized, clinical study.

SETTING

Three internal medicine firms from an urban teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

Six hundred ninety-four consecutive hospitalized non-ICU patients ordered to receive respiratory treatments.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Discordant respiratory care orders, respiratory care charges, hospital length of stay, and patient-specific complications. Discordant orders were defined as written orders for respiratory treatments that were not clinically indicated as well as orders omitting treatments that were clinically indicated according to protocol-based treatment algorithms.

RESULTS

Firm A patients (n = 239) received RCP-directed treatments and had a statistically lower rate of discordant respiratory care orders (24.3%) as compared with patients receiving physician-directed treatments in firms B (n = 205; 58.5%) and C (n = 250; 56.8%; p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences in patient complications were observed. The average number of respiratory treatments and respiratory care charges were statistically less for firm A patients (10.7 +/- 13.7 treatments; $868 +/- 1,519) as compared with patients in firms B (12.4 +/- 12.7 treatments, $1,124 +/- 1,339) and C (12.3 +/- 13.4 treatments, $1, 054 +/- 1,346; p = 0.009 [treatments] and p < 0.001 [respiratory care charges]).

CONCLUSIONS

Respiratory care managed by RCP-directed treatment protocols for non-ICU patients is safe and showed greater agreement with institutional treatment algorithms as compared with physician-directed respiratory care. Additionally, the overall utilization of respiratory treatments was significantly less among patients receiving RCP-directed respiratory care.

摘要

背景

医生经常为住院患者开呼吸治疗的处方,但此类治疗对临床结果的影响难以评估。

目的

比较接受由呼吸治疗师(RCP)指导的治疗方案或医生直接医嘱管理的呼吸治疗的患者的临床结果。

设计

一项单中心、半随机临床研究。

地点

一家城市教学医院的三个内科科室。

患者

694名连续住院的非重症监护病房患者,医嘱接受呼吸治疗。

主要观察指标

不一致的呼吸治疗医嘱、呼吸治疗费用、住院时间和患者特定并发症。不一致的医嘱定义为未按基于方案的治疗算法临床指征开具的呼吸治疗书面医嘱,以及遗漏临床指征治疗的医嘱。

结果

A科室的患者(n = 239)接受RCP指导的治疗,与B科室(n = 205;58.5%)和C科室(接受医生直接治疗的患者,n = 250;56.8%;p < 0.001)相比,呼吸治疗医嘱不一致的发生率在统计学上较低(24.3%)。未观察到患者并发症有统计学上的显著差异。与B科室(12.4±12.7次治疗,1124±1339美元)和C科室(12.3±13.4次治疗,1054±1346美元)的患者相比,A科室患者的呼吸治疗平均次数和呼吸治疗费用在统计学上更少(10.7±13.7次治疗;868±1519美元;p = 0.009[治疗次数],p < 0.001[呼吸治疗费用])。

结论

与医生直接指导的呼吸治疗相比,由RCP指导的治疗方案管理的非重症监护病房患者的呼吸治疗是安全的,并且与机构治疗算法的一致性更高。此外,接受RCP指导的呼吸治疗的患者中呼吸治疗的总体使用率显著更低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验