Suppr超能文献

一项预防青少年吸烟的社区干预随机对照试验。

A randomised controlled trial of a community intervention to prevent adolescent tobacco use.

作者信息

Biglan A, Ary D V, Smolkowski K, Duncan T, Black C

机构信息

Center for Community Interventions on Childrearing, Oregon Research Institute, OR 97403-1983, USA.

出版信息

Tob Control. 2000 Mar;9(1):24-32. doi: 10.1136/tc.9.1.24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Experimental evaluation of comprehensive community wide programme to prevent adolescent tobacco use.

DESIGN

Eight pairs of small Oregon communities (population 1700 to 13 500) were randomly assigned to receive a school based prevention programme or the school based programme plus a community programme. Effects were assessed through five annual surveys (time 1-5) of seventh and ninth grade (ages 12-15 years) students.

INTERVENTION

The community programme included: (a) media advocacy, (b) youth anti-tobacco activities, (c) family communications about tobacco use, and (d) reduction of youth access to tobacco.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The prevalence of self reported smoking and smokeless tobacco use in the week before assessment.

RESULTS

The community programme had significant effects on the prevalence of weekly cigarette use at times 2 and 5 and the effect approached significance at time 4. An effect on the slope of prevalence across time points was evident only when time 2 data points were eliminated from the analysis. The intervention affected the prevalence of smokeless tobacco among grade 9 boys at time 2. There were also significant effects on the slope of alcohol use among ninth graders and the quadratic slope of marijuana for all students.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that comprehensive community wide interventions can improve on the preventive effect of school based tobacco prevention programmes and that effective tobacco prevention may prevent other substance use.

摘要

目的

对一项预防青少年吸烟的社区综合项目进行实验评估。

设计

随机选取八对俄勒冈州的小社区(人口1700至13500),一组接受基于学校的预防项目,另一组接受基于学校的项目加社区项目。通过对七年级和九年级(12 - 15岁)学生进行的五次年度调查(时间点1 - 5)来评估效果。

干预措施

社区项目包括:(a)媒体宣传,(b)青少年反吸烟活动,(c)关于吸烟的家庭沟通,以及(d)减少青少年获取烟草的机会。

主要观察指标

评估前一周自我报告的吸烟和使用无烟烟草的流行率。

结果

社区项目在时间点2和5对每周吸烟率有显著影响,在时间点4这种影响接近显著。仅当从分析中剔除时间点2的数据时,干预对各时间点吸烟率斜率的影响才明显。干预在时间点2对九年级男生无烟烟草使用率有影响。对九年级学生饮酒率斜率以及所有学生大麻使用二次方斜率也有显著影响。

结论

结果表明,社区综合干预可提高基于学校的烟草预防项目的预防效果,且有效的烟草预防可能预防其他物质的使用。

相似文献

4
School-based programmes for preventing smoking.以学校为基础的预防吸烟计划。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30;2013(4):CD001293. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001293.pub3.
6
School-based programmes for preventing smoking.以学校为基础的预防吸烟项目。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(4):CD001293. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001293.

引用本文的文献

3
An evaluation of the Be Your Own Baby public awareness campaign.对“Be Your Own Baby”公众意识宣传活动的评估。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct;56(5):766-776. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13698. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
10
Behavioral Science and the Prevention of Adolescent Substance Abuse.行为科学与青少年药物滥用的预防
Perspect Behav Sci. 2019 Jul 15;42(3):547-563. doi: 10.1007/s40614-019-00217-y. eCollection 2019 Sep.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验