Biglan A, Ary D, Yudelson H, Duncan T E, Hood D, James L, Koehn V, Wright Z, Black C, Levings D, Smith S, Gaiser E
Center for Community Interventions on Childrearing, Oregon Research Institute, Eugene, 97403-1983, USA.
Am J Community Psychol. 1996 Jun;24(3):311-39. doi: 10.1007/BF02512025.
The experimental evaluation of two components of a community intervention to prevent adolescent tobacco use are described. Youth antitobacco activities (e.g., peer quizzes, sidewalk art, poster and T-shirt giveaways, etc.) and family communications activities (pamphlets to parents and student quizzes of parents) were evaluated in two time-series experiments, each of which was conducted in two experimental and one control community. Students in Grades 6 and 8 and their parents were assessed in a series of four phone surveys in the first experiment and six phone surveys in the second. Implementation of the youth antitobacco and family communications activities led to significantly greater exposure of young people to antitobacco information. They led to increases in parent and youth knowledge about tobacco use and more negative attitudes toward tobacco. In Experiment 2, youths in intervention communities had significantly lower rated intentions to smoke. The findings suggest the value of a modular approach to community interventions for influencing the social context relevant to the onset of adolescent tobacco use.
本文描述了一项预防青少年吸烟的社区干预措施中两个组成部分的实验评估。在两项时间序列实验中,对青少年反烟草活动(如同伴测验、街头艺术、海报及T恤赠送等)和家庭沟通活动(面向家长的宣传册以及对家长的学生测验)进行了评估,每项实验均在两个实验社区和一个对照社区开展。在第一项实验中,通过一系列四次电话调查对六年级和八年级学生及其家长进行了评估,在第二项实验中则进行了六次电话调查。青少年反烟草活动和家庭沟通活动的实施使年轻人更多地接触到了反烟草信息。这些活动使家长和青少年对烟草使用的知识有所增加,且对烟草的态度更为负面。在实验2中,干预社区的青少年吸烟意愿评分显著较低。研究结果表明,采用模块化方法进行社区干预对于影响与青少年吸烟起始相关的社会环境具有重要价值。