Suppr超能文献

弗洛伊德、荣格和比昂的哲学假设:因果关系问题。

Philosophical assumptions in Freud, Jung and Bion: questions of causality.

作者信息

Horne M, Sowa A, Isenman D

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.

出版信息

J Anal Psychol. 2000 Jan;45(1):109-21. doi: 10.1111/1465-5922.00140.

Abstract

The historical development of concepts of causality in philosophy is described. Since the Enlightenment and the growth of science, exponents of the two most important concepts, determinism and teleology, have been in conflict. At the inception of psychoanalysis at the end of the nineteenth century this conflict was particularly intense. It was the cause of the first major schism in psychoanalysis between Jung and Freud. Psychoanalytic theorists have continued to disagree over this issue. Post-modernist philosophy has abolished all metaphysics and therefore called into question concepts of psychic causality. Parallel to, but uninfluenced by this development, Bion has developed a psychoanalytic conceptualization which may be seen as transcending causality. The clinical and theoretical implications of these developments are described.

摘要

本文描述了哲学中因果关系概念的历史发展。自启蒙运动和科学发展以来,两个最重要概念——决定论和目的论——的支持者一直处于冲突之中。在19世纪末精神分析诞生之初,这种冲突尤为激烈。这是荣格和弗洛伊德之间精神分析首次重大分裂的原因。精神分析理论家在这个问题上一直存在分歧。后现代主义哲学摒弃了所有形而上学,因此对心理因果关系的概念提出了质疑。与这一发展并行但未受其影响的是,比昂发展了一种精神分析概念化,可被视为超越了因果关系。文中描述了这些发展的临床和理论意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验