Green A
Psychoanal Q. 2000 Jan;69(1):1-39. doi: 10.1002/j.2167-4086.2000.tb00553.x.
Both the intrapsychic and the intersubjective take part in the analytic process. A pointless struggle for supremacy may await those who support either point of view exclusively. If the "objectal" perspective is well known, the "subjectal" one is less theoretically defined: it includes the series of the ego, the self, the subject, the I, etc. The drive is the matrix of the subject. An examination of the relationships between perception and representation raises the question of the connections between drive and object. The object is the revealer of the drive. A revision of Freud's theory must underline the role of the object, which is unduly neglected. The new paradigm should consider the indissociable couple, drive-object. The construction of the object leads retroactively to the hypothesis of the drive, which reciprocally constructs the object. The function of the similar other (autre semblable) is defined as a fundamental link (desire and identification). The intersubjective relationship connects two intrapsychic subjects. Force and meaning are intertwined and combine their effects. Psychic causality is at the crossroads of the biological (metabiological) and the cultural. This paper examines the transition from the first topographic model to the second.
精神内部和主体间性都参与到分析过程中。对于那些只支持其中任一观点的人来说，可能会面临一场毫无意义的主导权之争。如果说“客体性”视角广为人知，那么“主体性”视角在理论上的界定则较为薄弱：它涵盖了自我、自体、主体、本我等一系列概念。驱力是主体的基质。对感知与表象之间关系的审视引出了驱力与客体之间联系的问题。客体是驱力的揭示者。对弗洛伊德理论的修正必须强调客体的作用，而这一作用一直被过度忽视。新的范式应考虑驱力与客体这一不可分割的二元组合。客体的构建会追溯到驱力的假设，而驱力又反过来构建客体。相似他者（autre semblable）的功能被定义为一种基本联系（欲望与认同）。主体间性关系连接着两个精神内部的主体。力与意义相互交织并共同发挥作用。精神因果关系处于生物性（元生物性）与文化的交叉点上。本文探讨了从第一种地形模型到第二种地形模型的转变。
