Suppr超能文献

辅助阴道头位分娩的决定至分娩间隔时间

Decision to delivery intervals for assisted vaginal vertex delivery.

作者信息

Okunwobi-Smith Y, Cooke I, MacKenzie I Z

机构信息

Nuffield Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, UK.

出版信息

BJOG. 2000 Apr;107(4):467-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb13263.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the time interval between decision for assisted vaginal delivery and the birth of the baby in different clinical circumstances.

DESIGN

A prospective analysis of 225 consecutive women with a singleton fetal cephalic presentation in the second stage of labour requiring an operative vaginal delivery for various reasons.

SETTING

A maternity unit in a district general hospital delivering more than 6,000 women annually.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The decision to delivery interval and the immediate and short term maternal and neonatal outcomes according to indication for operative vaginal delivery.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) decision to delivery interval was 34.4 minutes (28.3) with a range of 5 to 101 minutes. For those delivered because of suspected fetal distress, the interval of 26.5 minutes (14.0) was significantly shorter than for those performed without fetal distress 39.5 minutes (19.0) (P < 0.0001); for cases with fetal distress, forceps were significantly quicker at 23.3 minutes (14.3) than the ventouse 29.2 minutes (13.2) (P = 0.04). The longer the interval in cases of fetal distress the less favourable the condition of the neonate at birth, although this trend did not reach statistical significance and was not seen for deliveries expedited for other reasons. Perineal repair was required following 96% forceps deliveries compared with 87% ventouse (P = 0.015). Perineal trauma was not influenced by the interval between decision and delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

If speed of delivery is important, use of forceps results in a quicker birth than use of the ventouse, without any compromise to the condition of the baby at delivery, and with similar rates of perineal trauma.

摘要

目的

描述在不同临床情况下决定实施辅助阴道分娩至婴儿出生的时间间隔。

设计

对225例单胎头先露、在第二产程因各种原因需要实施手术阴道分娩的连续产妇进行前瞻性分析。

地点

一家地区综合医院的产科病房,每年分娩超过6000名妇女。

主要观察指标

决定分娩的间隔时间,以及根据手术阴道分娩指征得出的即刻和短期母婴结局。

结果

决定分娩的平均(标准差)间隔时间为34.4分钟(28.3),范围为5至101分钟。因怀疑胎儿窘迫而分娩的产妇,间隔时间为26.5分钟(14.0),显著短于无胎儿窘迫产妇的39.5分钟(19.0)(P<0.0001);对于有胎儿窘迫的病例,产钳助产明显更快,为23.3分钟(14.3),而胎头吸引术为29.2分钟(13.2)(P = 0.04)。在胎儿窘迫病例中,间隔时间越长,出生时新生儿状况越差,尽管这种趋势未达到统计学意义,且在因其他原因加快分娩的情况中未观察到。96%的产钳助产分娩后需要会阴修补,而胎头吸引术为87%(P = 0.015)。决定与分娩之间的间隔时间对会阴创伤无影响。

结论

如果分娩速度很重要,使用产钳比使用胎头吸引术分娩更快,且对分娩时婴儿状况无任何影响,会阴创伤发生率相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验