Allain J P
Division of Transfusion Medicine, Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Clin Lab Haematol. 2000 Feb;22(1):1-10. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2257.2000.00265.x.
The residual risk of post-transfusion human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is low but slightly higher for hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV), the main reason being viraemia during the window period preceding antibody or antigen detection by enzyme immunoassays. Immunosilent-infected individuals and carriers of distant viral variants also play an unquantifiable role. Multiple techniques, e.g. reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), PCR, ligase-chain reaction, nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA) and transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) have been developed to amplify and detect viral genomes as single or multiplex assays. Equipment providing various degrees of automation has been adapted to these techniques. Applying nucleic acid amplification techniques (NAT) to blood screening, two main approaches have been advocated: plasma pool and single-donation testing. Pool testing presents the advantage of lower cost and readily available equipment although it is prone to false negative and positive reactions. The time required to identify infected donations is incompatible with blood component release, and may lead to product waste. Single-unit testing, although appealing, is not yet fully automated and potentially very costly unless a systematic multiplex approach is taken. Although technically feasible, NAT applied to the blood supply needs to be clinically evaluated and its cost efficiency assessed in the general public health context. However, pool NAT is currently implemented in continental Europe and the USA.
输血后感染人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)的残留风险较低,但感染乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)和丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)的风险略高,主要原因是在酶免疫测定检测抗体或抗原之前的窗口期存在病毒血症。免疫沉默感染个体和远距离病毒变异体携带者也发挥着不可量化的作用。已经开发了多种技术,例如逆转录-聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)、聚合酶链反应(PCR)、连接酶链反应、基于核酸序列的扩增(NASBA)和转录介导的扩增(TMA),以作为单一或多重检测来扩增和检测病毒基因组。提供不同程度自动化的设备已适用于这些技术。将核酸扩增技术(NAT)应用于血液筛查,主要提倡两种方法:血浆池检测和单份献血检测。池检测具有成本较低和设备易于获得的优点,尽管它容易出现假阴性和阳性反应。识别受感染献血所需的时间与血液成分的发放不兼容,并且可能导致产品浪费。单单位检测虽然很有吸引力,但尚未完全自动化,而且除非采用系统的多重检测方法,否则可能成本非常高。尽管在技术上可行,但应用于血液供应的NAT需要进行临床评估,并在一般公共卫生背景下评估其成本效益。然而,目前在欧洲大陆和美国实施了血浆池NAT检测。