• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

散焦和瞳孔大小对人眼对比度敏感度的影响。

Effects of defocus and pupil size on human contrast sensitivity.

作者信息

Strang N C, Atchison D A, Woods R L

机构信息

Centre for Eye Research, School of Optometry, Queensland University of Technology, Australia.

出版信息

Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1999 Sep;19(5):415-26.

PMID:10768022
Abstract

Defocus lowers the contrast sensitivity function (CSF), producing a complex function with local dips and peaks. Previously, we were able to predict the shape of the CSF with large pupils from measured transverse aberrations with hypermetropic defocus but not with myopic defocus (Atchison et al., 1998c, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A. 15, 2536). As there is no reason that myopic defocus should be more difficult to predict than hypermetropic defocus, we modified the procedure to try to improve CSF predictions with myopic defocus. Also, we extended the study to consider a range of pupil sizes. CSFs were measured for three subjects at three defocus levels (in-focus, -2D and +2D) and three pupil sizes (2 mm, 4 mm and 6 mm). Using a diffraction optics model, transverse aberration measures and in-focus CSF measures, we predicted the defocused CSFs. The predicted defocused CSFs were lower than the in-focus CSF as expected, and had complex shapes that varied with defocus and pupil size and between subjects. While a few predictions were poor, generally, the overall magnitude and shape of the defocused CSFs were well predicted and similarly so for myopic and hypermetropic defocus. Some further improvements in technique are indicated.

摘要

散焦会降低对比敏感度函数(CSF),产生一个具有局部凹陷和峰值的复杂函数。此前,我们能够根据远视性散焦时测量的横向像差来预测大瞳孔情况下CSF的形状,但近视性散焦时则无法做到(阿奇森等人,1998c,《美国光学学会志A》15卷,2536页)。由于没有理由认为近视性散焦比远视性散焦更难预测,我们修改了程序,试图改进对近视性散焦时CSF的预测。此外,我们还扩展了研究范围,考虑了一系列瞳孔大小。对三名受试者在三种散焦水平(聚焦、-2D和+2D)以及三种瞳孔大小(2毫米、4毫米和6毫米)下测量了CSF。利用衍射光学模型、横向像差测量值和聚焦时的CSF测量值,我们预测了散焦时的CSF。正如预期的那样,预测的散焦时的CSF低于聚焦时的CSF,并且具有随散焦、瞳孔大小以及受试者之间而变化的复杂形状。虽然有一些预测效果不佳,但总体而言,散焦时CSF的整体大小和形状得到了很好的预测,近视性散焦和远视性散焦的情况类似。文中指出了技术上的一些进一步改进方向。

相似文献

1
Effects of defocus and pupil size on human contrast sensitivity.散焦和瞳孔大小对人眼对比度敏感度的影响。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1999 Sep;19(5):415-26.
2
Stimulus requirements for the decoding of myopic and hyperopic defocus under single and competing defocus conditions in the chicken.鸡在单焦和竞争离焦条件下近视性和远视性离焦解码的刺激要求
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Jul;46(7):2242-52. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-1200.
3
Effect of positive and negative defocus on contrast sensitivity in myopes and non-myopes.正负离焦对近视者和非近视者对比敏感度的影响。
Vision Res. 2004;44(16):1869-78. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.03.007.
4
Age-related changes of defocus-specific contrast sensitivity in healthy subjects.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2000 Jul;20(4):323-34.
5
Predicting the effects of optical defocus on human contrast sensitivity.预测光学离焦对人眼对比度敏感度的影响。
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1998 Sep;15(9):2536-44. doi: 10.1364/josaa.15.002536.
6
Lower sensitivity to peripheral hypermetropic defocus due to higher order ocular aberrations.由于高阶像差的存在,人眼对周边远视离焦的敏感性降低。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2020 May;40(3):300-307. doi: 10.1111/opo.12673. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
7
A quantitative investigation into the effects of pupil diameter and defocus on contrast sensitivity for an extended range of spatial frequencies in natural and homatropinized eyes.对自然眼和后马托品化眼在广泛空间频率范围内瞳孔直径和散焦对对比敏感度影响的定量研究。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1987;7(1):21-30.
8
Measuring contrast sensitivity with inappropriate optical correction.使用不适当的光学矫正测量对比敏感度。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2000 Nov;20(6):442-51.
9
Ocular compensation for alternating myopic and hyperopic defocus.眼睛对交替性近视和远视性离焦的代偿。
Vision Res. 2005 Jun;45(13):1667-77. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.12.013.
10
The effect of defocus on the contrast and phase of the retinal image of a sinusoidal grating.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1989 Oct;9(4):398-404.

引用本文的文献

1
Objective Changes in the Contralateral Eye after Unilateral Cataract Surgery.目的:单侧白内障手术后对侧眼的变化。
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2025 Feb;39(1):48-56. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2024.0139. Epub 2024 Dec 23.
2
Foveal neural adaptation to optically induced contrast reduction.光诱导对比度降低的中央凹神经适应。
J Vis. 2024 Sep 3;24(9):13. doi: 10.1167/jov.24.9.13.
3
Pupil Size Is Sensitive to Low-Level Stimulus Features, Independent of Arousal-Related Modulation.瞳孔大小对低水平刺激特征敏感,与唤醒相关的调制无关。
eNeuro. 2023 Oct 18;10(10). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0005-23.2023. Print 2023 Oct.
4
Absolute prediction of relative changes in contrast sensitivity with aberrations using a single metric of retinal image quality.使用单一视网膜图像质量指标对像差引起的对比敏感度相对变化进行绝对预测。
Biomed Opt Express. 2023 Jun 12;14(7):3203-3212. doi: 10.1364/BOE.487217. eCollection 2023 Jul 1.
5
A study on disability glare vision in young adult subjects.一项针对年轻成年受试者的残疾眩光视力的研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 2;13(1):3508. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30658-0.
6
Mesopic conditions optimise the detection of visual function loss in drivers with simulated media opacity.模拟介质不透明条件下,中间视觉条件能优化对驾驶员视觉功能丧失的检测。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 1;12(1):13165. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17448-w.
7
Effects of screen-based retinal light stimulation measured with a novel contrast sensitivity test.屏幕基视网膜光刺激对新型对比敏感度测试的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 29;16(7):e0254877. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254877. eCollection 2021.
8
Factors Affecting Contrast Sensitivity in Healthy Individuals: A Pilot Study.健康个体中影响对比敏感度的因素:一项初步研究。
Turk J Ophthalmol. 2017 Apr;47(2):80-84. doi: 10.4274/tjo.93763. Epub 2017 Apr 1.
9
Evaluation of Contrast Sensitivity, Chromatic Vision, and Reading Ability in Patients with Primary Open Angle Glaucoma.原发性开角型青光眼患者对比敏感度、色觉和阅读能力的评估
J Ophthalmol. 2016;2016:7074016. doi: 10.1155/2016/7074016. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
10
Factors influencing contrast sensitivity function in myopic eyes.影响近视眼对比敏感度函数的因素。
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 17;9(11):e113562. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113562. eCollection 2014.