• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

组织结构对程序公平感的影响。

The effect of organizational structure on perceptions of procedural fairness.

作者信息

Schminke M, Ambrose M L, Cropanzano R S

机构信息

College of Business Administration, Creighton University, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Psychol. 2000 Apr;85(2):294-304. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.294.

DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.294
PMID:10783545
Abstract

This study explored the relationship between 3 dimensions of organizational structure--centralization, formalization, and size--and perceptions of procedural and interactional fairness. Data from 11 organizations (N = 209) indicated that, as predicted, centralization was negatively related to perceptions of procedural fairness, and organizational size was negatively related to interactional fairness. However, contrary to predictions, formalization was not related to perceptions of procedural fairness. Results suggest that organizational structure and design should play a more prominent role in our thinking about organizational fairness.

摘要

本研究探讨了组织结构的三个维度——集权化、形式化和规模——与程序公平感和互动公平感之间的关系。来自11个组织(N = 209)的数据表明,正如预期的那样,集权化与程序公平感呈负相关,组织规模与互动公平感呈负相关。然而,与预测相反,形式化与程序公平感无关。结果表明,组织结构和设计在我们对组织公平性的思考中应发挥更突出的作用。

相似文献

1
The effect of organizational structure on perceptions of procedural fairness.组织结构对程序公平感的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2000 Apr;85(2):294-304. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.294.
2
Organization structure as a moderator of the relationship between procedural justice, interactional justice, perceived organizational support, and supervisory trust.组织结构作为程序公正、互动公正、感知到的组织支持与上级信任之间关系的调节变量。
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Apr;88(2):295-305. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.295.
3
If you feel bad, it's unfair: a quantitative synthesis of affect and organizational justice perceptions.如果你感觉糟糕,这是不公平的:情感与组织公正感的定量综合分析。
J Appl Psychol. 2007 Jan;92(1):286-95. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.286.
4
Predictive effects of organizational justice on job satisfaction in bus drivers: the moderating effects of role overload and proactive personality.组织公正对公交车司机工作满意度的预测作用:角色超载和主动性人格的调节作用。
BMC Public Health. 2024 May 13;24(1):1294. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18801-6.
5
The Effect of Organizational Justice and Trust on Job Stress in Hospital Organizations.组织公正与信任对医院组织中工作压力的影响。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2018 Sep;50(5):558-566. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12419. Epub 2018 Aug 12.
6
Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research.《千禧年的正义:对25年组织正义研究的元分析综述》
J Appl Psychol. 2001 Jun;86(3):425-45. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425.
7
Work gets unfair for the depressed: cross-lagged relations between organizational justice perceptions and depressive symptoms.工作对抑郁者不公:组织公正知觉与抑郁症状之间的交叉滞后关系。
J Appl Psychol. 2011 May;96(3):602-18. doi: 10.1037/a0022463.
8
Justice and organizational citizenship behavior intentions: fair rewards versus fair treatment.公平与组织公民行为意图:公平奖励与公平对待
J Soc Psychol. 2002 Feb;142(1):33-44. doi: 10.1080/00224540209603883.
9
When do procedural fairness and outcome fairness interact to influence employees' work attitudes and behaviors? The moderating effect of uncertainty.程序性公平和结果公平何时相互作用影响员工的工作态度和行为?不确定性的调节作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2010 Mar;95(2):291-304. doi: 10.1037/a0017866.
10
The influence of job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and fairness perceptions on organizational citizenship behavior.工作满意度、组织承诺和公平感对组织公民行为的影响。
J Psychol. 1998 May;132(3):277-90. doi: 10.1080/00223989809599167.

引用本文的文献

1
Structured evaluation processes are associated with higher levels of employee belonging.结构化评估流程与员工更高的归属感相关联。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 17;15(1):13289. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-97901-8.
2
The fairness of human resource management practices: an assessment by the justice sensitive.人力资源管理实践的公平性:公正敏感者的评估
Front Psychol. 2024 Mar 26;15:1355378. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1355378. eCollection 2024.
3
Temporal dynamics of justice climate and team innovation.公平氛围与团队创新的时间动态
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 1;13:699319. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.699319. eCollection 2022.
4
The Key to Work-Life Balance is (Enriched) Job Design? Three-Way Interaction Effects with Formalization and Adaptive Personality Characteristics.工作与生活平衡的关键在于(丰富化的)工作设计?与形式化及适应性人格特征的三方交互效应。
Appl Res Qual Life. 2023;18(2):647-676. doi: 10.1007/s11482-022-10100-9. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
5
Socioeconomic status differences in psychological responses to unfair treatments: Behavioral evidence of a vicious cycle.社会经济地位差异对不公平待遇的心理反应:恶性循环的行为证据。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 10;17(6):e0268286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268286. eCollection 2022.
6
Fair Topologies: Community Structures and Network Hubs Drive Emergence of Fairness Norms.公平拓扑:社区结构和网络枢纽推动公平规范的出现。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 2;7(1):2686. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-01876-0.
7
Modeling organizational justice improvements in a pediatric health service : a discrete-choice conjoint experiment.在儿科医疗服务中构建组织公平改进模型:离散选择联合实验。
Patient. 2013;6(1):45-59. doi: 10.1007/s40271-013-0002-7.