Suppr超能文献

格拉斯哥昏迷量表:特定总分排列组合中的死亡率差异。

Glasgow Coma Scale: variation in mortality among permutations of specific total scores.

作者信息

Teoh L S, Gowardman J R, Larsen P D, Green R, Galletly D C

机构信息

Section of Anaesthesia, Wellington School of Medicine, New Zealand.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 2000 Feb;26(2):157-61. doi: 10.1007/s001340050039.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine whether different score permutations of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) giving the same GCS total score were associated with significantly different mortality.

DESIGN

For each GCS total we compared the mortality associated with each of the different GCS permutations using a Fisher's exact test. The relationship between components of the GCS score and mortality was also examined using uni- and multivariate logistic regression.

SETTING

Data were collected from the intensive care unit at Wellington Hospital, a multidisciplinary, tertiary referral unit.

PATIENTS

We analysed the GCS and mortality data from all admissions over a 4 year period (January 1994-January 1998). Patients with GCS scores of 3 or 15 were excluded, since these two total scores do not have multiple permutations, leaving 1,390 patients with GCS scores of 4-14 for analysis.

RESULTS

The incidence of mortality was significantly different for the different permutations for total GCS scores of 7, 9, 11 and 14.

CONCLUSIONS

It is possible for patients to have the same total GCS score, but significantly different risks of mortality due to differences in the GCS profile making up that score. This suggests that GCS scores may be more useful reported in terms of profiles rather than totals. This could also have implications for the use of other scoring systems such as Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation and Simplified Acute Physiology Score.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是确定格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)总分相同但评分排列不同时,死亡率是否存在显著差异。

设计

对于每个GCS总分,我们使用Fisher精确检验比较了与不同GCS排列相关的死亡率。还使用单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析了GCS评分各组成部分与死亡率之间的关系。

地点

数据收集自惠灵顿医院重症监护病房,该病房是一个多学科的三级转诊科室。

患者

我们分析了4年期间(1994年1月至1998年1月)所有入院患者的GCS和死亡率数据。GCS评分为3或15的患者被排除,因为这两个总分没有多种排列,剩下1390例GCS评分为4至14的患者进行分析。

结果

GCS总分7、9、11和14的不同排列的死亡率发生率存在显著差异。

结论

患者可能具有相同的GCS总分,但由于构成该分数的GCS分布不同,死亡率风险可能存在显著差异。这表明,以分布而非总分的形式报告GCS评分可能更有用。这也可能对其他评分系统的使用产生影响,如急性生理与慢性健康评估和简化急性生理学评分。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验