Nostro A, Germanò M P, D'angelo V, Marino A, Cannatelli M A
Pharmaco-Biological Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Messina, Italy.
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2000 May;30(5):379-84. doi: 10.1046/j.1472-765x.2000.00731.x.
A comparative study on the antimicrobial properties of extracts from medicinal plants obtained by two different methods was carried out. The screening of the antimicrobial activity of extracts from six plants was conducted by a disc diffusion test against Gram-positive, -negative and fungal organisms. The most active extracts (inhibition diameter >/=12 mm) were assayed for the minimum inhibitory concentration and submitted to phytochemical screening by thin-layer chromatography and bioautography. The results obtained indicate that the diethyl ether extracts were the most efficient antimicrobial compounds. The activity was more pronounced against Gram-positive and fungal organisms than against Gram-negative bacteria. Bioautography showed that the antimicrobial activity was probably due to flavonoids and terpenes.
对通过两种不同方法获得的药用植物提取物的抗菌特性进行了比较研究。通过纸片扩散法对六种植物提取物针对革兰氏阳性菌、革兰氏阴性菌和真菌的抗菌活性进行了筛选。对活性最强的提取物(抑菌圈直径≥12毫米)测定了最低抑菌浓度,并通过薄层色谱法和生物自显影法进行了植物化学筛选。所得结果表明,乙醚提取物是最有效的抗菌化合物。该活性对革兰氏阳性菌和真菌比对革兰氏阴性菌更明显。生物自显影显示,抗菌活性可能归因于黄酮类化合物和萜类化合物。