Tabenkin H, Gross R
The Faculty of the Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Health Policy. 2000 Jun;52(2):73-85. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(00)00070-1.
The aim of the study was to determine the attitudes of policy makers in the health care system in Israel to a change in the role of primary care physicians (PCP) and to ascertain the conditions under which they would be ready to adopt the model of PCP as gatekeeper. The study design was qualitative, with analyses of in-depth structured interviews of 20 policy makers from the Ministry of Health, the Sick Funds' central administrations and the Israel Medical Association (IMA) central office. The majority of the respondents claim that they want highly trained PCPs (family physicians, pediatricians and internals) to play a central role in the health care system. They should be co-ordinators, highly accessible and should be able to weigh cost considerations. However, only about half of the respondents support a full gatekeeper model and most of them think that the gatekeeper concept has a negative connotation. They also feel that it would be difficult to implement regulations regarding primary care. The barriers to implementation of the gatekeeper model, as cited by the respondents include loss of faith in PCPs by the general population, dearth of PCPs with adequate training, low stature, lack of availability on a 24-h basis, resistance by specialists, strong competition between the sick funds including promises of direct access to specialists, the medical care habits of the general population many of whom do not settle for only one opinion, and a declared anti-gatekeeper policy by one of the sick funds. Ways to overcome these obstacles include implementation of fundholding clinics, patient education on the importance of having a personal physician, appropriate marketing by family medicine and primary care advocates, and continued training in primary care. Israeli health care policy makers have an ambivalent attitude to strengthening the role of primary care. In theory, they profess support for placing primary care physicians in a central role in the health care system. However, in practice almost half oppose the full gatekeeper model. Therefore, introduction of a gatekeeper model into the Israeli health care system should be implemented gradually, based on incentives rather than regulations. Furthermore, the idea should be marketed by the primary care physicians' professional organizations, the Ministry of Health and the sick funds to physicians as well as to patients, in order to garner their support. In light of the broad consensus that competent primary care physicians are the basis for implementation of the gatekeeper model, board certification should be gradually required by employers of primary care physicians. The process of training physicians currently working in the system should be encouraged and supported by the Ministry of Health. Given the existing opposition of policy makers to giving primary care physicians exclusive referral rights to specialists, the current policy of direct access to a limited number of specialties should be continued but not extended to other specialties.
本研究的目的是确定以色列医疗保健系统中政策制定者对初级保健医生(PCP)角色转变的态度,并确定他们准备采用PCP作为守门人模式的条件。研究设计为定性研究,对来自卫生部、疾病基金中央管理部门和以色列医学协会(IMA)中央办公室的20名政策制定者进行了深入的结构化访谈分析。大多数受访者声称,他们希望训练有素的PCP(家庭医生、儿科医生和内科医生)在医疗保健系统中发挥核心作用。他们应该是协调者,随时可及,并能够权衡成本因素。然而,只有约一半的受访者支持全面的守门人模式,而且他们中的大多数人认为守门人概念有负面含义。他们还认为,实施有关初级保健的法规会很困难。受访者提到的实施守门人模式的障碍包括公众对PCP失去信心、缺乏受过充分培训的PCP、地位低下、无法提供24小时服务、专科医生的抵制、疾病基金之间的激烈竞争(包括承诺可直接看专科医生)、许多公众的医疗习惯(他们中的许多人不满足于只听取一种意见)以及其中一个疾病基金宣称奉行的反守门人政策。克服这些障碍的方法包括实施基金持有诊所、对患者进行关于拥有私人医生重要性的教育、家庭医学和初级保健倡导者进行适当的营销以及持续进行初级保健培训。以色列医疗保健政策制定者对加强初级保健作用持矛盾态度。理论上,他们宣称支持让初级保健医生在医疗保健系统中发挥核心作用。然而,实际上几乎一半的人反对全面的守门人模式。因此,将守门人模式引入以色列医疗保健系统应基于激励而非法规逐步实施。此外,初级保健医生专业组织、卫生部和疾病基金应向医生以及患者宣传这一理念,以获得他们的支持。鉴于广泛的共识是称职的初级保健医生是实施守门人模式的基础,雇主应逐步要求初级保健医生获得委员会认证。卫生部应鼓励并支持对目前在该系统工作的医生进行培训的过程。鉴于政策制定者目前反对赋予初级保健医生向专科医生独家转诊的权利,应继续目前允许直接看有限数量专科的政策,但不应扩大到其他专科。