• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭地震灾害调整措施采用情况的相关因素。

Correlates of household seismic hazard adjustment adoption.

作者信息

Lindell M K, Whitney D J

机构信息

Hazard Reduction and Recovery Center, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843-3137, USA.

出版信息

Risk Anal. 2000 Feb;20(1):13-25. doi: 10.1111/0272-4332.00002.

DOI:10.1111/0272-4332.00002
PMID:10795335
Abstract

This study examined the relationships of self-reported adoption of 12 seismic hazard adjustments (pre-impact actions to reduce danger to persons and property) with respondents' demographic characteristics, perceived risk, perceived hazard knowledge, perceived protection responsibility, and perceived attributes of the hazard adjustments. Consistent with theoretical predictions, perceived attributes of the hazard adjustments differentiated among the adjustments and had stronger correlations with adoption than any of the other predictors. These results identify the adjustments and attributes that emergency managers should address to have the greatest impact on improving household adjustment to earthquake hazard.

摘要

本研究考察了自我报告的12种地震灾害应对措施(为减少人员和财产危险而采取的震前行动)的采用情况与受访者的人口统计学特征、感知风险、感知灾害知识、感知保护责任以及对灾害应对措施的感知属性之间的关系。与理论预测一致,灾害应对措施的感知属性在不同措施之间存在差异,并且与采用情况的相关性比其他任何预测因素都更强。这些结果确定了应急管理人员为最大程度地影响家庭对地震灾害的应对而应关注的应对措施和属性。

相似文献

1
Correlates of household seismic hazard adjustment adoption.家庭地震灾害调整措施采用情况的相关因素。
Risk Anal. 2000 Feb;20(1):13-25. doi: 10.1111/0272-4332.00002.
2
Why people do what they do to protect against earthquake risk: perceptions of hazard adjustment attributes.人们采取措施防范地震风险的原因:对灾害适应属性的认知。
Risk Anal. 2009 Aug;29(8):1072-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01243.x. Epub 2009 Jun 5.
3
Earthquake risk perception in Bucharest, Romania.罗马尼亚布加勒斯特的地震风险认知
Risk Anal. 2006 Oct;26(5):1223-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00810.x.
4
Households' perceived personal risk and responses in a multihazard environment.多灾种环境下家庭感知的个人风险及应对措施
Risk Anal. 2008 Apr;28(2):539-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01032.x.
5
Earthquake beliefs and adoption of seismic hazard adjustments.地震观念与地震灾害调整措施的采用
Risk Anal. 2004 Feb;24(1):87-102. doi: 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00414.x.
6
Risk factors associated with moderate and serious injuries attributable to the 1994 Northridge Earthquake, Los Angeles, California.与1994年加利福尼亚州洛杉矶北岭地震所致中度和重度损伤相关的风险因素。
Ann Epidemiol. 2001 Jul;11(5):347-57. doi: 10.1016/s1047-2797(01)00220-4.
7
Urban earthquake hazard: perceived seismic risk and preparedness in Dhaka City, Bangladesh.城市地震灾害:孟加拉国达卡市的感知地震风险和准备情况。
Disasters. 2010 Apr;34(2):337-59. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2009.01132.x. Epub 2009 Oct 26.
8
The relationship between demographic/educational parameters and perceptions, knowledge and earthquake mitigation in Israel.以色列人口统计学/教育参数与地震减灾感知、知识之间的关系。
Disasters. 2011 Jan;35(1):36-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2010.01191.x. Epub 2010 Aug 16.
9
A study of Maryland dental hygienists' perceptions regarding self-assessment.一项关于马里兰州牙科保健员自我评估认知的研究。
J Dent Hyg. 2001 Spring;75(2):121-9.
10
[Regional conditions for differentiation of population reproduction in Poland].[波兰人口再生产分化的区域条件]
Wiad Stat (Warsaw). 1987 Jun;32(6):29-32.

引用本文的文献

1
Stakeholder's response to COVID-19 using Protective Action Decision Model: Perception of Saudi citizens.利益相关者使用保护行动决策模型对COVID-19的反应:沙特公民的认知
Jamba. 2025 Jun 5;17(1):1886. doi: 10.4102/jamba.v17i1.1886. eCollection 2025.
2
The driving mechanism of citizens' protective behaviors for rainstorm flood disasters in China: An empirical study based on the protection motivation theory and protective action decision model.中国公民针对暴雨洪涝灾害的保护行为驱动机制:基于保护动机理论和保护行动决策模型的实证研究
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 28;10(22):e38482. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38482. eCollection 2024 Nov 30.
3
Motivators and impediments to seismic retrofit implementation for wood-frame soft-story buildings: A case study in California.
木结构软层建筑抗震加固实施的动机与障碍:以加利福尼亚州为例
Earthq Spectra. 2022 Jun 19;38(4):2788-2812. doi: 10.1177/87552930221100844.
4
Behavioral, health- related and demographic risk factors of death in floods: A case-control study.洪水死亡的行为、健康相关和人口统计学风险因素:一项病例对照研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 31;16(12):e0262005. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262005. eCollection 2021.
5
Fostering disaster mitigation through community participation- case of Kochi residents following the Kerala floods of 2018 and 2019.通过社区参与促进减灾——以2018年和2019年喀拉拉邦洪水后科钦居民为例
Nat Hazards (Dordr). 2022;111(1):389-410. doi: 10.1007/s11069-021-05058-0. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
6
Cognition and Implementation of Disaster Preparedness among Japanese Dialysis Facilities.日本透析设施的灾害准备认知与实施情况
Int J Nephrol. 2021 Jan 5;2021:6691350. doi: 10.1155/2021/6691350. eCollection 2021.
7
An Analysis of Rural Households' Earthquake-Resistant Construction Behavior: Evidence from Pingliang and Yuxi, China.农村家庭抗震建设行为分析:来自中国平凉和玉溪的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 4;17(23):9079. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17239079.
8
Determinants of Domestic Risk Prevention Behavior: The Importance of Separating Effects Within-Persons and Between-Persons.国内风险预防行为的决定因素:在个体内和个体间分离效应的重要性。
Risk Anal. 2021 Jun;41(6):929-943. doi: 10.1111/risa.13632. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
9
The likelihood of having a household emergency plan: understanding factors in the US context.制定家庭应急计划的可能性:了解美国背景下的相关因素。
Nat Hazards (Dordr). 2020;104(2):1331-1343. doi: 10.1007/s11069-020-04217-z. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
10
Factors motivating Mexico City residents to earthquake mass evacuation drills.促使墨西哥城居民参与地震大规模疏散演习的因素。
Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2020 Oct;49:101661. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101661. Epub 2020 May 15.