• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人们采取措施防范地震风险的原因:对灾害适应属性的认知。

Why people do what they do to protect against earthquake risk: perceptions of hazard adjustment attributes.

作者信息

Lindell Michael K, Arlikatti Sudha, Prater Carla S

机构信息

Hazard Reduction & Recovery Center, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-3137, USA.

出版信息

Risk Anal. 2009 Aug;29(8):1072-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01243.x. Epub 2009 Jun 5.

DOI:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01243.x
PMID:19508448
Abstract

This study examined respondents' self-reported adoption of 16 hazard adjustments (preimpact actions to reduce danger to persons and property), their perceptions of those adjustments' attributes, and the correlations of those perceived attributes with respondents' demographic characteristics. The sample comprised 561 randomly selected residents from three cities in Southern California prone to high seismic risk and three cities from Western Washington prone to moderate seismic risks. The results show that the hazard adjustment perceptions were defined by hazard-related attributes and resource-related attributes. More significantly, the respondents had a significant degree of consensus in their ratings of those attributes and used them to differentiate among the hazard adjustments, as indicated by statistically significant differences among the hazard adjustment profiles. Finally, there were many significant correlations between respondents' demographic characteristics and the perceived characteristics of hazard adjustments, but there were few consistent patterns among these correlations.

摘要

本研究调查了受访者自我报告的16种灾害应对措施(减少人员和财产危险的震前行动)的采用情况、他们对这些应对措施属性的认知,以及这些认知属性与受访者人口特征的相关性。样本包括从南加州三个地震高危城市和华盛顿州西部三个地震中危城市随机选取的561名居民。结果表明,灾害应对措施认知由灾害相关属性和资源相关属性定义。更重要的是,受访者对这些属性的评分有显著的共识,并利用它们区分不同的灾害应对措施,灾害应对措施概况之间的统计显著差异表明了这一点。最后,受访者的人口特征与灾害应对措施的认知特征之间存在许多显著相关性,但这些相关性中几乎没有一致的模式。

相似文献

1
Why people do what they do to protect against earthquake risk: perceptions of hazard adjustment attributes.人们采取措施防范地震风险的原因:对灾害适应属性的认知。
Risk Anal. 2009 Aug;29(8):1072-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01243.x. Epub 2009 Jun 5.
2
Correlates of household seismic hazard adjustment adoption.家庭地震灾害调整措施采用情况的相关因素。
Risk Anal. 2000 Feb;20(1):13-25. doi: 10.1111/0272-4332.00002.
3
Earthquake beliefs and adoption of seismic hazard adjustments.地震观念与地震灾害调整措施的采用
Risk Anal. 2004 Feb;24(1):87-102. doi: 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00414.x.
4
Earthquake risk perception in Bucharest, Romania.罗马尼亚布加勒斯特的地震风险认知
Risk Anal. 2006 Oct;26(5):1223-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00810.x.
5
Urban earthquake hazard: perceived seismic risk and preparedness in Dhaka City, Bangladesh.城市地震灾害:孟加拉国达卡市的感知地震风险和准备情况。
Disasters. 2010 Apr;34(2):337-59. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2009.01132.x. Epub 2009 Oct 26.
6
Salient beliefs about earthquake hazards and household preparedness.有关地震灾害和家庭准备的显著信念。
Risk Anal. 2013 Sep;33(9):1710-27. doi: 10.1111/risa.12014. Epub 2013 Jan 22.
7
The relationship between demographic/educational parameters and perceptions, knowledge and earthquake mitigation in Israel.以色列人口统计学/教育参数与地震减灾感知、知识之间的关系。
Disasters. 2011 Jan;35(1):36-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2010.01191.x. Epub 2010 Aug 16.
8
Households' perceived personal risk and responses in a multihazard environment.多灾种环境下家庭感知的个人风险及应对措施
Risk Anal. 2008 Apr;28(2):539-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01032.x.
9
Hazard perception, risk perception, and the need for decontamination by residents exposed to soil pollution: the role of sustainability and the limits of expert knowledge.受土壤污染影响居民的危害感知、风险感知及去污需求:可持续性的作用与专家知识的局限性
Risk Anal. 2008 Apr;28(2):387-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01025.x.
10
Flooding risks: a comparison of lay people's perceptions and expert's assessments in Switzerland.洪水风险:瑞士普通民众认知与专家评估的比较
Risk Anal. 2006 Aug;26(4):971-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00792.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Disaster preparedness: The role of spatial disaster learning using geospatial technology.灾害准备:利用地理空间技术进行空间灾害学习的作用。
Jamba. 2024 Nov 8;16(1):1576. doi: 10.4102/jamba.v16i1.1576. eCollection 2024.
2
How did consumers' self-protective behavior formed during the COVID-19 pandemic?在新冠疫情期间,消费者的自我保护行为是如何形成的?
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 9;14:1075211. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1075211. eCollection 2023.
3
Analyzing the Disaster Preparedness Capability of Local Government Using AHP: Zhengzhou 7.20 Rainstorm Disaster.
运用层次分析法分析地方政府的灾害准备能力:以郑州 7·20 暴雨灾害为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 4;20(2):952. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20020952.
4
What attributes influence rural household's willingness to get vaccinated for COVID-19? Perspectives from six Chinese townships.哪些因素影响农村家庭接种 COVID-19 疫苗的意愿?来自中国六个乡镇的观点。
Vaccine. 2023 Jan 16;41(3):702-715. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.11.062. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
5
Stay in Risk Area: Place Attachment, Efficacy Beliefs and Risk Coping.留在风险区:场所依恋、效能信念和风险应对。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 18;19(4):2375. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042375.
6
Subhealth Risk Perception Scale: Development and Validation of a New Measure.亚健康风险感知量表:一种新测量工具的编制与验证。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Jan 10;2022:9950890. doi: 10.1155/2022/9950890. eCollection 2022.
7
The influence of new information that contradicts common knowledge about earthquake preparedness in Israel: A mixed methods experiment study.新信息对以色列地震防范常识的影响:一项混合方法实验研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 14;16(4):e0250127. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250127. eCollection 2021.
8
Social Networks, Trust, and Disaster-Risk Perceptions of Rural Residents in a Multi-Disaster Environment: Evidence from Sichuan, China.社会网络、信任与多灾环境下农村居民的灾害风险感知——来自中国四川的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 22;18(4):2106. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18042106.
9
Determinants of Domestic Risk Prevention Behavior: The Importance of Separating Effects Within-Persons and Between-Persons.国内风险预防行为的决定因素:在个体内和个体间分离效应的重要性。
Risk Anal. 2021 Jun;41(6):929-943. doi: 10.1111/risa.13632. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
10
The likelihood of having a household emergency plan: understanding factors in the US context.制定家庭应急计划的可能性:了解美国背景下的相关因素。
Nat Hazards (Dordr). 2020;104(2):1331-1343. doi: 10.1007/s11069-020-04217-z. Epub 2020 Aug 6.