Crowther C, Middleton P
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Adelaide, Women's and Children's Hospital, King William Road, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, SA 5006.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;1997(2):CD000021. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000021.
The development of Rh immunisation and its prophylactic use since the 1970s has meant that severe Rhesus D (RhD) alloimmunisation is now rarely seen.
The objective of this systematic review was to assess the effects of giving anti-D to Rhesus negative women, with no anti-D antibodies, who had given birth to a Rhesus positive infant.
We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, MEDLINE (from 1966 to January 1999) and reference lists of relevant articles. Date of last search of Cochrane Controlled Trials Register: January 1999.
Randomised trials in Rhesus negative women without antibodies who were given anti-D immunoglobulin postpartum compared with no treatment or placebo.
Assessments of inclusion criteria, trial quality and data extraction were done by each author independently. Initial analyses included all trials. Other analyses assessed the effect of trial quality, ABO compatibility and dose.
Six eligible trials compared postpartum anti-D prophylaxis with no treatment or placebo. The trials involved over 10,000 women, but trial quality varied. Anti-D lowered the incidence of RhD alloimmunisation six months after birth (relative risk 0.04, 95% confidence interval 0.02 to 0.06), and in a subsequent pregnancy (relative risk 0.12, 95% confidence interval 0. 07 to 0.23). These benefits were seen regardless of the ABO status of the mother and baby and when anti-D was given within 72 hours of birth. Higher doses (up to 200 micro grams) were more effective than lower doses (up to 50 micro grams) in preventing RhD alloimmunisation in a subsequent pregnancy.
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Anti-D, given within 72 hours after childbirth, reduces the risk of RhD alloimmunisation in Rhesus negative women who have given birth to a Rhesus positive infant. However the evidence on the optimal dose is limited.
自20世纪70年代以来,Rh免疫的发展及其预防性应用意味着严重的恒河猴D(RhD)同种免疫现在很少见。
本系统评价的目的是评估给出生了Rh阳性婴儿、无抗D抗体的Rh阴性女性注射抗D的效果。
我们检索了Cochrane妊娠与分娩组试验注册库、Cochrane对照试验注册库、MEDLINE(1966年至1999年1月)以及相关文章的参考文献列表。Cochrane对照试验注册库的最后检索日期:1999年1月。
将产后接受抗D免疫球蛋白治疗的无抗体Rh阴性女性与未治疗或安慰剂组进行比较的随机试验。
纳入标准评估、试验质量评估和数据提取由每位作者独立完成。初始分析纳入了所有试验。其他分析评估了试验质量、ABO血型相容性和剂量的影响。
六项符合条件的试验将产后抗D预防与未治疗或安慰剂进行了比较。这些试验涉及超过10000名女性,但试验质量各不相同。抗D降低了出生后六个月RhD同种免疫的发生率(相对危险度0.04,95%置信区间0.02至0.06),以及在随后妊娠中的发生率(相对危险度0.12,95%置信区间0.07至0.23)。无论母婴的ABO血型状态如何,以及在出生后72小时内给予抗D,均可观察到这些益处。在预防随后妊娠中的RhD同种免疫方面,较高剂量(高达200微克)比较低剂量(高达50微克)更有效。
产后72小时内给予抗D可降低出生了Rh阳性婴儿的Rh阴性女性发生RhD同种免疫的风险。然而,关于最佳剂量的证据有限。