Suppr超能文献

孕期阴道念珠菌病的局部治疗

Topical treatment for vaginal candidiasis in pregnancy.

作者信息

Young G L, Jewell D

机构信息

Barn Croft Surgery, Temple Sowerby, Penrith, Cumbria, CA10 1RZ.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2001(2):CD000225. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000225.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Vaginal candidiasis (moniliasis or thrush) is a common and frequently distressing infection for many women. It is even more common in pregnancy.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to assess the effects of different methods of treating vaginal candidiasis in pregnancy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register. In addition, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CENTRAL/CCTR) was searched. Date of last search: April 1999.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials of any treatment for vaginal candidiasis in pregnancy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers assessed trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

Twelve trials were included. Based on five trials, imidazole drugs were more effective than nystatin when treating vaginal candidiasis in pregnancy (odds ratio 0.21, 95% confidence interval 0.16 to 0.29). Nystatin,in turn was more effective than hydrargaphen in one trial.A trial of clotrimazole was more effective than placebo (odds ratio 0.14, 95% confidence interval 0.06 to 0.31). Single dose treatment was less effective than three or four days treatment when assessed by culture and by symptoms in three different trials and treatment lasting for four days was less effective than treatment for seven days (odds ratio 10.6, 95% confidence interval 4.01 to 28.05). Based on two trials, treatment for seven days was no more or less effective than treatment for 14 days (odds ratio 0.41, 95% confidence interval 0.16 to 1.05).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Topical imidazole appears to be more effective than nystatin for treating symptomatic vaginal candidiasis in pregnancy. Treatments for seven days may be necessary.

摘要

背景

阴道念珠菌病(念珠菌病或鹅口疮)对许多女性来说是一种常见且常常令人苦恼的感染。在孕期更为常见。

目的

本综述的目的是评估孕期治疗阴道念珠菌病的不同方法的效果。

检索策略

我们检索了Cochrane妊娠与分娩组试验注册库。此外,还检索了Cochrane对照试验注册库(CENTRAL/CCTR)。最后检索日期:1999年4月。

选择标准

孕期阴道念珠菌病任何治疗方法的随机试验。

数据收集与分析

两名评价员评估试验质量并提取数据。

主要结果

纳入了12项试验。基于5项试验,在治疗孕期阴道念珠菌病时,咪唑类药物比制霉菌素更有效(比值比0.21,95%置信区间0.16至0.29)。反过来,在一项试验中制霉菌素比汞溴酚更有效。一项克霉唑试验比安慰剂更有效(比值比0.14,95%置信区间0.06至0.31)。在三项不同试验中,通过培养和症状评估时,单剂量治疗不如三或四天的治疗有效,且持续四天的治疗不如七天的治疗有效(比值比10.6,95%置信区间4.01至28.05)。基于两项试验,七天治疗与十四天治疗的效果无差异(比值比0.41,95%置信区间0.16至1.05)。

评价员结论

局部使用咪唑类药物在治疗孕期有症状的阴道念珠菌病方面似乎比制霉菌素更有效。可能需要进行七天的治疗。

相似文献

1
Topical treatment for vaginal candidiasis in pregnancy.孕期阴道念珠菌病的局部治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2001(2):CD000225. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000225.
3
Treatment for recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (thrush).复发性外阴阴道念珠菌病(鹅口疮)的治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 10;1(1):CD009151. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009151.pub2.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验