Schierhout G, Roberts I
7 Barton Road, Greenside, Johannesburg 2193, South Africa.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;1997(2):CD000566. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000566.
Because hyperventilation is often associated with a rapid fall in intracranial pressure, it has been assumed to be effective in the treatment of severe head injury. Hyperventilation reduces raised intracranial pressure by causing cerebral vasoconstriction and a reduction in cerebral blood flow. Whether reduced cerebral blood flow improves neurological outcome however, is unclear.
To quantify the effect of hyperventilation on death and neurological disability following head injury.
The search strategy drew on that of the Injuries Group as a whole. The reference lists of all relevant articles identified were checked and the first author of reports was contacted to ask for assistance in identifying any further trials. Most recent search was done in September 1999.
All randomised trials of hyperventilation, in which study participants had a clinically defined acute traumatic head injury of any severity. There were no language restrictions.
We collected data on the participants, the timing and duration of the intervention, duration of follow up, neurological disability and death. Relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each trial on an intention to treat basis. Timing, degree and duration of hyperventilation were identified a-priori as potential sources of heterogeneity between trials.
One trial of 113 participants was identified. Hyperventilation alone, as well as in conjunction with the buffer THAM showed a beneficial effect on mortality at one year after injury, although the effect measure was imprecise (RR=0.73; 95% CI 0.36;1.49 and RR=0.89; 95% CI 0.47;1.72 respectively). This improvement in outcome was not supported by an improvement in neurological recovery. For hyperventilation alone, the RR for death or severe disability was 1. 14 (95% CI 0.82;1.58). The RR for death or severe disability in the hyperventilation plus THAM group, was 0.87 (95% CI 0.58;1.28).
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The data available are inadequate to assess any potential benefit or harm that might result from hyperventilation in severe head injury. Randomised controlled trials to assess the effectiveness of hyperventilation therapy following severe head injury are needed.
由于过度换气常伴有颅内压迅速下降,人们认为它对重型颅脑损伤有效。过度换气通过引起脑血管收缩和脑血流量减少来降低升高的颅内压。然而,脑血流量减少是否能改善神经功能预后尚不清楚。
量化过度换气对颅脑损伤后死亡和神经功能残疾的影响。
检索策略借鉴了整个损伤研究组的策略。检查了所有已识别的相关文章的参考文献列表,并联系报告的第一作者,请求协助识别任何进一步的试验。最近一次检索于1999年9月进行。
所有过度换气的随机试验,其中研究参与者患有临床定义的任何严重程度的急性创伤性颅脑损伤。无语言限制。
我们收集了关于参与者、干预的时间和持续时间、随访时间、神经功能残疾和死亡的数据。每项试验均按意向性分析计算相对风险(RR)和95%置信区间。过度换气的时间、程度和持续时间被预先确定为试验间异质性的潜在来源。
确定了一项有113名参与者的试验。单独过度换气以及与缓冲剂THAM联合使用对受伤后一年的死亡率有有益影响,尽管效应测量不精确(RR分别为0.73;95%CI 0.36;1.49和RR为0.89;95%CI 0.47;1.72)。神经功能恢复的改善并不支持这种预后的改善。单独过度换气时,死亡或严重残疾的RR为1.14(95%CI 0.82;1.58)。过度换气加THAM组中死亡或严重残疾的RR为0.87(95%CI 0.58;1.28)。
现有数据不足以评估重型颅脑损伤中过度换气可能带来的任何潜在益处或危害。需要进行随机对照试验来评估重型颅脑损伤后过度换气治疗的有效性。