Bataille P, Coevoet B, Cuvelier D, Descoeudres C, Drüeke T, Moynot A, Poignet J L, Ryckelynck J P, Stroumza P
Hôpital Docteur Duchenne, Boulogne-sur-Mer.
Nephrologie. 2000;21(2):57-63.
The objective of this cross-sectional study in a population of 1472 dialysis patients was to identify the main factors involved in the choice of a specific option for dialysis therapy, taking into account three different types of criteria such as medical dependence (DM), nurse care requirement (SI) and independence for dialysis therapy (CA).
Each patient has been analysed, independently of present treatment modality, according to the above three criteria, namely DM, SI and CA. For each type of parameter, patients have been allocated to one of three levels, each level being established to evaluate whether dialytic treatment should be undertaken as hospital centre dialysis (HDC) or in a facility off the hospital. Level 3 of any one category corresponded to the inability of doing haemodialysis at home (HHD) or in self-care unit (AD). Level 2 included patients who could be treated in AD or by peritoneal dialysis (PD) with the assistance of a nurse. CAPD or HHD were considered as potential treatment modalities only in patients qualifying for level 1 of each criterion.
In the patient population as a whole, the following treatment options were observed: HHD 3.6%, CAPD 6%, PD 1.8%, AD 16.3% and HDC 72.2%. For medical dependence (DM) there was a relatively even distribution for the three levels in six centres. In contrast, two centres were characterized by a predominance of DM level 3. Differences in DM levels between centres were greatly reduced when considering separately only those patients who were actually treated by CAPD, HDC and AD. SI levels were more uniformly distributed within all centres, and this was true for HCD and AD patients. When considering CA levels in HDC patients, a large predominance of CA level 3 was observed in all centres whereas CA level 1 was nearly in existent.
The major finding of this study was that the inability or the refusal of dialysis patients to participate at treatment, independently of medical condition and nurse care requirement, was the main factor in the choice of hospital centre dialysis.
在1472名透析患者群体中开展的这项横断面研究的目的是,考虑医疗依赖(DM)、护士护理需求(SI)和透析治疗独立性(CA)这三种不同类型的标准,确定透析治疗特定选择中涉及的主要因素。
根据上述DM、SI和CA这三个标准,对每位患者进行分析,不考虑当前的治疗方式。对于每种类型的参数,患者被分配到三个级别之一,每个级别用于评估透析治疗应在医院中心透析(HDC)还是在医院外的机构进行。任何一个类别的3级对应于无法在家中(HHD)或在自我护理单元(AD)进行血液透析。2级包括那些可以在AD或在护士协助下进行腹膜透析(PD)治疗的患者。仅在符合每个标准1级的患者中,持续性非卧床腹膜透析(CAPD)或HHD才被视为潜在治疗方式。
在整个患者群体中,观察到以下治疗选择:HHD占3.6%,CAPD占6%,PD占1.8%,AD占16.3%,HDC占72.2%。在六个中心,医疗依赖(DM)的三个级别分布相对均匀。相比之下,有两个中心的特点是DM 3级占主导。仅分别考虑实际接受CAPD、HDC和AD治疗的患者时,各中心之间DM水平的差异大幅减小。SI水平在所有中心内分布更为均匀,HCD和AD患者均如此。在考虑HDC患者的CA水平时,所有中心均观察到CA 3级占主导,而CA 1级几乎不存在。
本研究的主要发现是,透析患者无论病情和护士护理需求如何,无法或拒绝参与治疗是选择医院中心透析的主要因素。