Suppr超能文献

比较男性和女性的健康不平等:1986 - 1996年死亡率的前瞻性研究

Comparing health inequality in men and women: prospective study of mortality 1986-96.

作者信息

Sacker A, Firth D, Fitzpatrick R, Lynch K, Bartley M

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Royal Free and University College London( )Medical School, London WC1E 6BT.

出版信息

BMJ. 2000 May 13;320(7245):1303-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7245.1303.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To study prospectively the differences in health inequality in men and women from 1986-96 using the Office for National Statistics' longitudinal study and new socioeconomic classification. To assess the relative importance of social class (based on employment characteristics) and social position according to the general social advantage of the household to mortality risk in men and women.

DESIGN

Prospective study.

SETTING

England and Wales.

SUBJECTS

Men and women of working age at the time of the 1981 census, with a recorded occupation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mortality.

RESULTS

In men, social class based on employment relations, measured according to the Office for National Statistics' socioeconomic classification, was the most important influence on mortality. In women, social class based on individual employment relations and conditions showed only a weak gradient. Large differences in risk of mortality in women were found, however, when social position was measured according to the general social advantage in the household.

CONCLUSIONS

Comparisons of the extent of health inequality in men and women are affected by the measures of social inequality used. For women, even those in paid work, classifications based on characteristics of the employment situation may give a considerable underestimate. The Office for National Statistics' new measure of socioeconomic position is useful for assessing health inequality in men, but in women a more important predictor of mortality is inequality in general social advantage of the household.

摘要

目的

利用英国国家统计局的纵向研究和新的社会经济分类方法,对1986年至1996年期间男性和女性健康不平等的差异进行前瞻性研究。评估社会阶层(基于就业特征)和根据家庭总体社会优势确定的社会地位对男性和女性死亡风险的相对重要性。

设计

前瞻性研究。

地点

英格兰和威尔士。

研究对象

1981年人口普查时处于工作年龄且有职业记录的男性和女性。

主要观察指标

死亡率。

结果

在男性中,根据英国国家统计局的社会经济分类衡量的基于就业关系的社会阶层是对死亡率最重要的影响因素。在女性中,基于个人就业关系和条件的社会阶层仅显示出微弱的梯度差异。然而,当根据家庭总体社会优势衡量社会地位时,发现女性的死亡风险存在很大差异。

结论

男性和女性健康不平等程度的比较受到所使用的社会不平等衡量方法的影响。对于女性,即使是从事有偿工作的女性,基于就业状况特征的分类可能会导致相当大的低估。英国国家统计局新的社会经济地位衡量方法对于评估男性的健康不平等是有用的,但对于女性而言,家庭总体社会优势的不平等是死亡率更重要的预测因素。

相似文献

1
Comparing health inequality in men and women: prospective study of mortality 1986-96.
BMJ. 2000 May 13;320(7245):1303-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7245.1303.
3
Socioeconomic differentials in mortality among men within Great Britain: time trends and contributory causes.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998 Apr;52(4):214-8. doi: 10.1136/jech.52.4.214.
4
Patterns of mortality in second generation Irish living in England and Wales: longitudinal study.
BMJ. 1996 Jun 1;312(7043):1389-92. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7043.1389.
5
Longitudinal studies based on vital registration records.
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1989;37(5-6):443-8.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of socioeconomic position (SEP) on women's health over the lifetime.
Maturitas. 2020 Oct;140:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2020.06.001. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
3
Theorising social class and its application to the study of health inequalities.
SSM Popul Health. 2018 Nov 2;7:015-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2018.10.015. eCollection 2019 Apr.
4
Socioeconomic indicators in epidemiologic research: A practical example from the LIFEPATH study.
PLoS One. 2017 May 30;12(5):e0178071. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178071. eCollection 2017.
8
Women's relative immunity to the socio-economic health gradient: artifact or real?
Glob Health Action. 2015 May 5;8:27259. doi: 10.3402/gha.v8.27259. eCollection 2015.
10
Effectiveness of the combined approach for assessing social gradients in stroke risk among married women in Japan.
J Epidemiol. 2012;22(4):324-30. doi: 10.2188/jea.je20110147. Epub 2012 Apr 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Socio-economic Position, Gender and Health: How Do They Interact?
J Health Psychol. 1997 Jul;2(3):315-34. doi: 10.1177/135910539700200304.
3
Social inequality in coronary heart disease: a comparison of occupational classifications.
Soc Sci Med. 1998 Aug;47(4):525-33. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00141-5.
4
Life expectancy in England: variations and trends by gender, health authority, and level of deprivation.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1997 Dec;51(6):649-58. doi: 10.1136/jech.51.6.649.
5
Comparing inequalities in women's and men's health: Britain in the 1990s.
Soc Sci Med. 1997 Mar;44(6):773-87. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00185-2.
6
Why are socioeconomic mortality differences smaller among women than among men?
Soc Sci Med. 1994 May;38(10):1385-96. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90276-3.
7
Smaller socioeconomic inequalities in health among women: the role of employment status.
Int J Epidemiol. 1995 Jun;24(3):559-68. doi: 10.1093/ije/24.3.559.
8
Inequalities in women's health: looking at mortality differentials using an alternative approach.
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1988 Apr 30;296(6631):1221-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.296.6631.1221.
9
Social class and mortality in occupational cohorts.
Am J Ind Med. 1992;22(1):141-2. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700220115.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验