• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

衣原体性生殖器感染的家庭筛查:年轻男女会接受吗?

Home screening for chlamydial genital infection: is it acceptable to young men and women?

作者信息

Stephenson J, Carder C, Copas A, Robinson A, Ridgway G, Haines A

机构信息

Department of Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Royal Free and University College Medical School, Mortimer Market Centre, London.

出版信息

Sex Transm Infect. 2000 Feb;76(1):25-7. doi: 10.1136/sti.76.1.25.

DOI:10.1136/sti.76.1.25
PMID:10817064
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1760558/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the acceptability, to young men and women, of home screening for chlamydial infection.

METHODS

We wrote to a random sample of 208 women aged 18-25 years and 225 men aged 18-35 years from three general practices, inviting them to undergo home screening for chlamydial infection. They were asked to return, by normal post, a urine specimen (for men and half of the women) or a vulval swab (other half of the women) for ligase chain reaction (LCR) testing for chlamydial infection. They were also asked to return a short questionnaire about risk status and the acceptability of this approach.

RESULTS

The participation rate among the available sample was 39% for women and 46% for men (p = 0.3). However, among women, the rate was slightly higher (p = 0.05) for urine samples (47%) than for vulval swabs (32%). Six per cent of women and 9% of men declined to take part, while 42% of women and 33% of men failed to respond. Two men objected to receiving the package at home. We received few other comments, positive and negative in about equal measure.

CONCLUSION

Home screening for chlamydial infection is a potentially efficient method of reaching young people who may have little contact with health services. Men were at least as likely as women to respond to this screening approach. Home screening might form a useful component of a future chlamydial screening programme in the United Kingdom.

摘要

目的

确定衣原体感染家庭筛查对年轻男女的可接受性。

方法

我们从三家全科诊所随机抽取了208名年龄在18至25岁之间的女性和225名年龄在18至35岁之间的男性,写信邀请他们接受衣原体感染家庭筛查。要求他们通过普通邮寄方式返还一份尿液样本(男性和一半女性)或一份外阴拭子(另一半女性),用于衣原体感染的连接酶链反应(LCR)检测。还要求他们返还一份关于风险状况和这种筛查方法可接受性的简短问卷。

结果

在可获得的样本中,女性的参与率为39%,男性为46%(p = 0.3)。然而,在女性中,尿液样本的参与率(47%)略高于外阴拭子(32%)(p = 0.05)。6%的女性和9%的男性拒绝参与,而42%的女性和33%的男性未回复。两名男性反对在家中收到包裹。我们收到的其他意见很少,正面和负面意见大致相当。

结论

衣原体感染家庭筛查是一种潜在有效的方法,可覆盖那些可能很少与医疗服务机构接触的年轻人。男性对这种筛查方法的回应可能性至少与女性相同。家庭筛查可能会成为英国未来衣原体筛查计划的一个有用组成部分。

相似文献

1
Home screening for chlamydial genital infection: is it acceptable to young men and women?衣原体性生殖器感染的家庭筛查:年轻男女会接受吗?
Sex Transm Infect. 2000 Feb;76(1):25-7. doi: 10.1136/sti.76.1.25.
2
Urine based screening for asymptomatic/undiagnosed genital chlamydial infection in young people visiting the accident and emergency department is feasible, acceptable, and can be epidemiologically helpful.对前往急诊部门就诊的年轻人进行基于尿液的无症状/未诊断生殖器衣原体感染筛查是可行的、可接受的,并且在流行病学上有帮助。
Sex Transm Infect. 2003 Jun;79(3):229-33. doi: 10.1136/sti.79.3.229.
3
Acceptability and consequences of screening for chlamydia trachomatis by home-based urine testing.通过家庭尿液检测筛查沙眼衣原体的可接受性及后果
Sex Transm Dis. 2005 Sep;32(9):557-62. doi: 10.1097/01.olq.0000175416.15905.db.
4
Feasibility of patient-collected vulval swabs for the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis in a family planning clinic: a pilot study.在计划生育诊所中患者自行采集外阴拭子用于诊断沙眼衣原体的可行性:一项试点研究。
Br J Fam Plann. 2000 Oct;26(4):202-6. doi: 10.1783/147118900101194797.
5
Chlamydial urethral infection in male students in Chiang Mai: a screening test of urine deposits by enzyme immunoassay (EIA).清迈男学生衣原体性尿道炎:通过酶免疫测定法(EIA)对尿沉渣进行的筛查试验。
J Med Assoc Thai. 1999 Jun;82(6):581-6.
6
Coverage and uptake of systematic postal screening for genital Chlamydia trachomatis and prevalence of infection in the United Kingdom general population: cross sectional study.英国普通人群中沙眼衣原体系统性邮政筛查的覆盖率、接受率及感染患病率:横断面研究
BMJ. 2005 Apr 23;330(7497):940. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38413.663137.8F. Epub 2005 Apr 4.
7
Repeat chlamydia screening by mail, San Francisco.通过邮件进行衣原体重复筛查,旧金山。
Sex Transm Infect. 2003 Feb;79(1):28-30. doi: 10.1136/sti.79.1.28.
8
[Systematic home screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infections of asymptomatic men and women in family practice by means of mail-in urine samples].[通过邮寄尿液样本对家庭医疗中无症状男性和女性进行沙眼衣原体感染的系统家庭筛查]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1999 Mar 27;143(13):672-6.
9
Screening women in jails for chlamydial and gonococcal infection using urine tests: feasibility, acceptability, prevalence, and treatment rates.使用尿液检测对监狱中的女性进行衣原体和淋病感染筛查:可行性、可接受性、患病率及治疗率。
Sex Transm Dis. 2002 May;29(5):271-6. doi: 10.1097/00007435-200205000-00004.
10
Opportunistic screening for genital chlamydial infection. I: acceptability of urine testing in primary and secondary healthcare settings.生殖道衣原体感染的机会性筛查。I:基层和二级医疗保健机构中尿液检测的可接受性。
Sex Transm Infect. 2003 Feb;79(1):16-21. doi: 10.1136/sti.79.1.16.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceptions of Self-Testing for Chlamydia: Understanding and Predicting Self-Test Use.对衣原体自我检测的认知:理解与预测自我检测的使用情况
Healthcare (Basel). 2016 May 10;4(2):25. doi: 10.3390/healthcare4020025.
2
Obtaining self-samples to diagnose curable sexually transmitted infections: a systematic review of patients' experiences.获取自我样本以诊断可治愈的性传播感染:对患者经历的系统评价
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 24;10(4):e0124310. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124310. eCollection 2015.
3
Genital chlamydia prevalence in Europe and non-European high income countries: systematic review and meta-analysis.欧洲及非欧洲高收入国家的生殖衣原体感染率:系统评价与荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2015 Jan 23;10(1):e0115753. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115753. eCollection 2015.
4
Rationale and design of REACT: a randomised controlled trial assessing the effectiveness of home-collection to increase chlamydia retesting and detect repeat positive tests.REACT的原理与设计:一项评估家庭样本采集对增加衣原体复查及检测重复阳性结果有效性的随机对照试验
BMC Infect Dis. 2014 Apr 24;14:223. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-223.
5
A randomized trial of home versus clinic-based sexually transmitted disease screening among men.一项针对男性的基于家庭与诊所的性传播疾病筛查的随机试验。
Sex Transm Dis. 2012 Nov;39(11):842-7. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3182649165.
6
Chlamydia trachomatis age-specific prevalence in women who used an internet-based self-screening program compared to women who were screened in family planning clinics.沙眼衣原体在使用基于互联网的自我筛查计划的女性与在计划生育诊所筛查的女性中的年龄特异性流行率比较。
Sex Transm Dis. 2011 Feb;38(2):74-8. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3182039d7f.
7
The prevalence of chlamydial infection in Estonia: a population-based survey.爱沙尼亚衣原体感染的患病率:一项基于人群的调查。
Int J STD AIDS. 2008 Jul;19(7):455-8. doi: 10.1258/ijsa.2008.007325.
8
Home screening for sexually transmitted diseases in high-risk young women: randomised controlled trial.高危年轻女性性传播疾病的家庭筛查:随机对照试验
Sex Transm Infect. 2007 Jul;83(4):286-91. doi: 10.1136/sti.2006.023762. Epub 2007 Feb 14.
9
Implementing chlamydia screening: what do women think? A systematic review of the literature.实施衣原体筛查:女性怎么看?一项文献系统综述
BMC Public Health. 2006 Sep 1;6:221. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-221.
10
Barriers to effective STI screening in a post-Soviet society: results from a qualitative study.后苏联社会有效性传播感染筛查的障碍:一项定性研究的结果
Sex Transm Infect. 2006 Aug;82(4):323-6. doi: 10.1136/sti.2005.019000.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy of home sampling for screening of Chlamydia trachomatis: randomised study.家庭采样筛查沙眼衣原体的效果:随机研究
BMJ. 1998 Jul 4;317(7150):26-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7150.26.
2
Comparison of two methods of screening for genital chlamydial infection in women attending in general practice: cross sectional survey.在普通诊所就诊的女性中两种筛查生殖道衣原体感染方法的比较:横断面调查
BMJ. 1997 Jul 26;315(7102):226-30. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7102.226.
3
Vulval swabs as alternative specimens for ligase chain reaction detection of genital chlamydial infection in women.外阴拭子作为女性生殖道衣原体感染连接酶链反应检测的替代标本。
J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Apr;35(4):836-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.4.836-838.1997.
4
Diagnosis of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women based on mailed samples obtained at home: multipractice comparative study.基于在家采集并邮寄的样本对女性泌尿生殖系统沙眼衣原体感染进行诊断:多机构比较研究
BMJ. 1996 Nov 9;313(7066):1186-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7066.1186.