• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Screening for breast and cervical cancer as a common cause for litigation. A false negative result may be one of an irreducible minimum of errors.乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查是常见的诉讼原因。假阴性结果可能是不可避免的最低限度错误之一。
BMJ. 2000 May 20;320(7246):1352-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7246.1352.
2
False-negative cervical smears: medico-legal fallacies and suggested remedies.宫颈涂片假阴性：法医学谬误及建议的补救措施。
Cytopathology. 1998 Jun;9(3):145-54. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2303.1998.00129.x.
3
Medicolegal affairs. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.法医学事务。国际细胞学会特别工作组总结。《迈向21世纪的诊断细胞学：一次国际专家会议及教程》
Acta Cytol. 1998 Jan-Feb;42(1):76-119; discussion 120-32. doi: 10.1159/000331537.
4
A smear on audit. Implications of the Leicester cervical smear audit.宫颈涂片检查审核中的问题。莱斯特宫颈涂片检查审核的影响。
BJOG. 2003 Jul;110(7):646-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-0528.2003.02015.x.
5
Defending the pap smear: a proactive approach to the litigation threat in gynecologic cytology.捍卫巴氏涂片检查：应对妇科细胞学诉讼威胁的积极策略。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2000 Nov;114 Suppl:S52-8.
6
"Litigation cells" in the Papanicolaou smear: extramural review of smears by "experts".
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997 Mar;121(3):292-5.
7
Quality and liability issues with the Papanicolaou smear: the problem of definition of errors and false-negative smears.巴氏涂片的质量与责任问题：错误及假阴性涂片的定义问题
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997 Mar;121(3):267-9.
8
Tracking cancer screening progress.
NCSL Legisbrief. 2009 Mar;17(17):1-2.
9
Cervical screening.宫颈筛查
Lancet. 2000 Jan 29;355(9201):410-1. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)74037-X.
10
Is screening for cancer worth while? Results from a well-woman clinic for cancer detection.癌症筛查是否值得？一家女性健康诊所的癌症检测结果。
Br Med J. 1970 Sep 19;3(5724):696-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.3.5724.696.

引用本文的文献

1
Reflections from Women with an Interval Breast Cancer Diagnosis: A Qualitative Analysis of Open Disclosure in the BreastScreen Western Australia Program.间隔期乳腺癌女性的反思：对西澳乳腺癌筛查计划中公开披露的定性分析。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2023 Feb 1;24(2):633-639. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.2.633.
2
Practitioner's role in implementing varying guidelines.从业者在实施不同指南中的作用。
Can Fam Physician. 2020 Apr;66(4):235.
3
Breast cancer screening in England and the United States: a comparison of provision and utilisation.英格兰和美国的乳腺癌筛查：供给与利用情况比较
Int J Public Health. 2015 Dec;60(8):881-90. doi: 10.1007/s00038-015-0740-5. Epub 2015 Oct 7.
4
The role of effective communication to enhance participation in screening mammography: a New Zealand case.有效沟通在提高乳腺钼靶筛查参与率方面的作用：新西兰案例
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2009 Feb;6(2):844-61. doi: 10.3390/ijerph6020844. Epub 2009 Feb 24.
5
Frequency of risk factors for cervical cancer among women in fertile age.育龄期女性宫颈癌危险因素的发生率。
Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2004 Feb;4(1):53-6. doi: 10.17305/bjbms.2004.3463.
6
A measure of informed choice.知情选择的一种衡量方式。
Health Expect. 2001 Jun;4(2):99-108. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00140.x.
7
Screening and litigation. The rate of interval cancers is too high.筛查与诉讼。间期癌的发生率过高。
BMJ. 2000 Sep 23;321(7263):760; author reply 761.

本文引用的文献

1
Screening versus diagnostic mammography.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999 Jul;173(1):3-7. doi: 10.2214/ajr.173.1.10397089.
2
A comparison of cancer detection rates achieved by breast cancer screening programmes by number of readers, for one and two view mammography: results from the UK National Health Service breast screening programme.英国国家医疗服务体系乳腺癌筛查项目中，针对单视图和双视图乳腺钼靶检查，按阅片者数量比较乳腺癌检出率：结果报告
J Med Screen. 1998;5(4):195-201. doi: 10.1136/jms.5.4.195.
3
Do women who undergo further investigation for breast screening suffer adverse psychological consequences? A multi-centre follow-up study comparing different breast screening result groups five months after their last breast screening appointment.接受进一步乳房筛查检查的女性会遭受不良心理影响吗？一项多中心随访研究，比较了不同乳房筛查结果组在其最后一次乳房筛查预约五个月后的情况。
J Public Health Med. 1998 Dec;20(4):396-403. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024793.
4
Recalling women for further investigation of breast screening: women's experiences at the clinic and afterwards.召回女性以进一步调查乳房筛查情况：女性在诊所及之后的经历。
J Public Health Med. 1997 Mar;19(1):29-36. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024582.
5
Do non-specific minimal signs in a biennial mammographic breast cancer screening programme need further diagnostic assessment?在两年一次的乳腺钼靶乳腺癌筛查项目中，非特异性微小征象是否需要进一步的诊断性评估？
Br J Radiol. 1997 Jan;70:34-38. doi: 10.1259/bjr.70.829.9059292.
6
Results from the NHS breast screening programme 1990-1993.1990 - 1993年英国国家医疗服务体系乳房筛查项目的结果。
J Med Screen. 1995;2(4):186-90. doi: 10.1177/096914139500200403.

Screening for breast and cervical cancer as a common cause for litigation. A false negative result may be one of an irreducible minimum of errors.

作者信息

Wilson R M

出版信息

BMJ. 2000 May 20;320(7246):1352-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7246.1352.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.320.7246.1352
PMID:10818006
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1118031/
Abstract
摘要