Parra-Blanco A, Kaminaga N, Kojima T, Endo Y, Tajiri A, Fujita R
Division of Gastroenterology, Endoscopy Unit, Fujigaoka Hospital, Showa University, Yokohama, Japan.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2000 Jun;51(6):676-81. doi: 10.1067/mge.2000.105203.
Coagulation and blended electrosurgical current are currently recommended for colonoscopic polypectomy, whereas pure cut current is believed to be associated with a higher risk of bleeding. However, the outcome of polypectomy performed with a cut current has not been evaluated in a large case series. Our objective was to study the incidence and nature of complications when polypectomy is performed with a pure cut current.
Among 9555 colonoscopic examinations, polypectomy cases were retrospectively reviewed for complications. The electrosurgical current applied was always the cutting waveform.
Electrosurgical polypectomy using pure cut current was performed to remove 4735 lesions. Hemoclips were applied to the excision site after polypectomy to prevent bleeding in 12% of the cases. Hemorrhage occurred in 1.1% of the polypectomies (3.1% of patients). The incidence of bleeding with the different methods was snare polypectomy 0.9%, endoscopic mucosal resection 1.6%, "hot" biopsy 0.4%, and piecemeal polypectomy 7.3%. Bleeding was immediate in 66.1% of episodes and delayed in 33.9%. Patients with delayed postpolypectomy bleeding were significantly younger than those with immediate bleeding (50.5 and 64.7 years, respectively, p < 0.001). There was 1 case of transmural burn, but no perforations.
Polypectomy can be performed with pure cut current with a bleeding rate comparable to that seen with the use of coagulation or blended current, provided that hemoclip placement can be used readily. Expertise in hemoclip placement is advisable if this method of polypectomy is to be used.
目前推荐使用凝血电流和混合电外科电流进行结肠镜息肉切除术,而单纯切割电流被认为会增加出血风险。然而,尚未在大型病例系列中评估使用切割电流进行息肉切除术的结果。我们的目的是研究使用单纯切割电流进行息肉切除术时并发症的发生率和性质。
在9555例结肠镜检查中,对息肉切除病例的并发症进行回顾性分析。所应用的电外科电流始终为切割波形。
使用单纯切割电流进行电外科息肉切除术以切除4735个病变。12%的病例在息肉切除术后在切除部位应用了止血夹以预防出血。息肉切除术中出血发生率为1.1%(患者的3.1%)。不同方法的出血发生率分别为圈套器息肉切除术0.9%、内镜黏膜切除术1.6%、“热”活检钳钳除术0.4%和分块息肉切除术7.3%。66.1%的出血事件为即时性出血,33.9%为延迟性出血。息肉切除术后延迟出血的患者明显比即时出血的患者年轻(分别为50.5岁和64.7岁,p<0.001)。有1例透壁烧伤,但无穿孔。
如果能方便地使用止血夹,使用单纯切割电流进行息肉切除术的出血率与使用凝血电流或混合电流相当。如果要使用这种息肉切除方法,建议具备放置止血夹的专业技能。