• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加工参数对硅橡胶颌面修复材料物理性能的影响。

Effects of processing parameters on physical properties of the silicone maxillofacial prosthetic materials.

作者信息

Lai J H, Hodges J S

机构信息

LAI Laboratories, Inc., Burnsville, MN, USA.

出版信息

Dent Mater. 1999 Nov;15(6):450-5. doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(99)00074-3.

DOI:10.1016/s0109-5641(99)00074-3
PMID:10863448
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Maxillofacial prostheses are commonly fabricated using dental stone molds. However, for evaluating physical properties, maxillofacial materials are most often cured in metal molds. A-2186 is a silicone-based maxillofacial prosthetic material. Because its cure may be inhibited by traces of impurities, its physical properties may be different when it contains additives and is cured in dental stone molds, compared to when it is cured in metal molds without additives. This study's purpose is to determine and compare the physical properties of A-2186 cured in stainless steel molds and stone molds. The effects of additives and cure conditions on the physical properties were also studied.

METHODS

Hardness, tensile strength, ultimate elongation, and tear strength of A-2186 cured in dental stone molds, stainless steel molds, and with and without additives were determined. The bonding strength of A-2186 to four adhesives was determined by the peel test. All comparisons were made using analysis of variance (ANOVA).

RESULTS

Hardness, tensile strength and ultimate elongation of A-2186 cured in stainless steel molds are significantly higher than those cured in stone molds. Adding a small amount of a pigment, a kaolin and a fiber reduces hardness, tensile strength, ultimate elongation and tear strength. Except for Hydrobond, the bond strength of the adhesives to A-2186 was not significantly affected by the cure conditions and additives.

SIGNIFICANCE

Physical properties of A-2186 are affected by the additives commonly used in fabricating maxillofacial prostheses, and use of stone molds for curing degrades A-2186's mechanical properties. In fabricating clinical prostheses, special attention should be exercised to avoid contamination of A-2186 with impurities that could inhibit curing and produce inferior prostheses.

摘要

目的

颌面修复体通常使用牙科石膏模型制作。然而,为了评估物理性能,颌面材料大多在金属模具中固化。A - 2186是一种硅基颌面修复材料。由于其固化可能会受到微量杂质的抑制,所以与在无添加剂的金属模具中固化相比,当它含有添加剂并在牙科石膏模具中固化时,其物理性能可能会有所不同。本研究的目的是测定并比较在不锈钢模具和石膏模具中固化的A - 2186的物理性能。同时还研究了添加剂和固化条件对物理性能的影响。

方法

测定了在牙科石膏模具、不锈钢模具中固化以及添加和不添加添加剂情况下A - 2186的硬度、拉伸强度、极限伸长率和撕裂强度。通过剥离试验测定了A - 2186与四种粘合剂的粘结强度。所有比较均采用方差分析(ANOVA)。

结果

在不锈钢模具中固化的A - 2186的硬度、拉伸强度和极限伸长率显著高于在石膏模具中固化的。添加少量颜料、高岭土和纤维会降低硬度、拉伸强度、极限伸长率和撕裂强度。除了Hydrobond,粘合剂与A - 2186的粘结强度不受固化条件和添加剂的显著影响。

意义

A - 2186的物理性能受颌面修复体常用添加剂的影响,使用石膏模具固化会降低A - 2186的机械性能。在制作临床修复体时,应特别注意避免A - 2186被可能抑制固化并导致修复体质量不佳的杂质污染。

相似文献

1
Effects of processing parameters on physical properties of the silicone maxillofacial prosthetic materials.加工参数对硅橡胶颌面修复材料物理性能的影响。
Dent Mater. 1999 Nov;15(6):450-5. doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(99)00074-3.
2
New organosilicon maxillofacial prosthetic materials.新型有机硅颌面修复材料。
Dent Mater. 2002 May;18(3):281-6. doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(01)00050-1.
3
Properties of silicone maxillofacial elastomer processed in stone and metal.在石材和金属中加工的硅酮颌面弹性体的性能
J Prosthet Dent. 1980 Oct;44(4):447-50. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(80)90107-9.
4
Mechanical properties and bonding of maxillofacial silicone elastomers.颌面硅橡胶弹性体的力学性能与黏合性。
Dent Mater. 2010 Feb;26(2):185-91. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.10.001. Epub 2009 Nov 4.
5
Effects of the Addition of Titanium Dioxide and Silaned Silica Nanoparticles on the Mechanical Properties of Maxillofacial Silicones.添加二氧化钛和硅烷化硅纳米粒子对颌面硅橡胶机械性能的影响。
J Prosthodont. 2017 Oct;26(7):611-615. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12438. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
6
Mechanical properties of 2 new addition-vulcanizing silicone prosthetic elastomers.两种新型加成型硫化硅橡胶人工合成弹性体的机械性能
Int J Prosthodont. 1999 Jul-Aug;12(4):359-62.
7
Comparison of the physical properties of two types of polydimethyl siloxane for fabrication of facial prostheses.用于面部假体制造的两种聚二甲基硅氧烷物理性能的比较。
J Prosthet Dent. 1992 May;67(5):679-82. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(92)90170-f.
8
Physicomechanical and cytotoxic properties of room temperature vulcanizing silicone prosthetic elastomers.室温硫化硅橡胶假体弹性体的物理力学和细胞毒性特性
Acta Odontol Scand. 1998 Aug;56(4):245-8. doi: 10.1080/00016359850142871.
9
Comparative evaluation of tensile strength, tear strength, color stability and hardness of conventional and 1% trisnorbornenylisobutyl polyhedralsilsesquioxane modified room temperature vulcanizing maxillofacial silicone after a six month artificial aging period.在六个月人工老化期后,对常规和 1%三异丙烯基异丁基笼型聚倍半硅氧烷改性室温硫化颌面硅橡胶的拉伸强度、撕裂强度、颜色稳定性和硬度进行比较评估。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2022 Oct-Dec;22(4):328-337. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_226_21.
10
An assessment of the physical properties and biocompatibility of three silicone elastomers.三种硅酮弹性体的物理性能和生物相容性评估。
J Prosthet Dent. 1994 May;71(5):500-4. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(94)90190-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the Mechanical and Physical Properties of Maxillofacial Silicone Type A-2186 Impregnated with a Hybrid Chitosan-TiO Nanocomposite Subjected to Different Accelerated Aging Conditions.对浸渍有壳聚糖-二氧化钛混合纳米复合材料的A-2186型颌面硅橡胶在不同加速老化条件下的力学和物理性能评估。
Biomimetics (Basel). 2023 Nov 11;8(7):539. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics8070539.
2
Effect of Thixotropic Agent on the Color Stability of Platinum-Based Silicone Maxillofacial Elastomers after Artificial Aging.触变剂对铂基硅橡胶颌面弹性体人工老化后颜色稳定性的影响
Materials (Basel). 2023 Aug 27;16(17):5867. doi: 10.3390/ma16175867.
3
Hybrid Chitosan-TiO Nanocomposite Impregnated in Type A-2186 Maxillofacial Silicone Subjected to Different Accelerated Aging Conditions: An Evaluation of Color Stability.
负载于A-2186型颌面硅橡胶中的壳聚糖-二氧化钛杂化纳米复合材料在不同加速老化条件下的颜色稳定性评估
Nanomaterials (Basel). 2023 Aug 20;13(16):2379. doi: 10.3390/nano13162379.
4
Influence of Different Pigment Incorporation Methods on the Sorption and Solubility of Medical Silicones.不同色素掺入方法对医用硅酮吸附性和溶解性的影响
Eur J Dent. 2022 Jul;16(3):521-527. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1716598. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
5
Influence of Different Pigmentations and Accelerated Aging on the Hardness and Tear Strength of the A-2186 and MDX4-4210 Silicones.不同色素沉着和加速老化对A - 2186和MDX4 - 4210硅酮硬度及撕裂强度的影响
Int J Dent. 2020 Aug 20;2020:8492091. doi: 10.1155/2020/8492091. eCollection 2020.
6
Advancements in Soft-Tissue Prosthetics Part B: The Chemistry of Imitating Life.软组织假肢的进展 第二部分:模仿生命的化学原理
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020 Apr 23;8:147. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00147. eCollection 2020.
7
Advancements in Soft-Tissue Prosthetics Part A: The Art of Imitating Life.软组织假肢的进展 A部分:模仿生命的艺术
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020 Mar 31;8:121. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00121. eCollection 2020.
8
Tear Strength Analysis of MDX4-4210 and A-2186 Silicones with Different Intrinsic Pigments Incorporated by Mechanical and Industrial Methods.通过机械和工业方法掺入不同固有颜料的MDX4-4210和A-2186硅酮的撕裂强度分析
Int J Dent. 2019 Dec 21;2019:2573095. doi: 10.1155/2019/2573095. eCollection 2019.
9
Influence of Different Pigment Incorporation Methods on Color, Dimensional Stability, and Detail Reproduction of Silicones.不同色素掺入方法对硅橡胶颜色、尺寸稳定性及细节再现性的影响
Eur J Dent. 2019 Jul;13(3):399-404. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1700768. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
10
Evaluation of Shore A hardness of maxillofacial silicones: the effect of dark storage and nanoparticles.颌面硅橡胶邵氏 A 硬度的评估:黑暗储存和纳米颗粒的影响
Eur Oral Res. 2018 May;52(2):99-104. doi: 10.26650/eor.2018.469. Epub 2018 May 1.