Nobrega Adhara Smith, de Moraes Melo Neto Clóvis Lamartine, de Magalhães Bertoz André Pinheiro, de Melo Moreno André Luiz, Goiato Marcelo Coelho
Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, São Paulo State University, School of Dentistry, Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Department of Pediatric and Social Dentistry, São Paulo State University, School of Dentistry, Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Eur J Dent. 2022 Jul;16(3):521-527. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1716598. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
The aim of this study is to verify the influence of three pigment incorporation methods (conventional, mechanical, and industrial) on the sorption and solubility of the MDX4-4210 and A-2186 silicones.
The groups formed were based on the silicones used (A-2186 and MDX4-4210), intrinsic pigments (pink, bronze, and black), and pigment incorporation methods (conventional, mechanical, and industrial). The dimensions of all samples were 45-mm diameter (ø) × 1-mm thickness. Readings were taken initially and after 1,008 hours of aging.
Three-way analysis of variance and the Tukey's test were performed (α = 0.05).
For sorption and solubility, there was no difference between the incorporation methods for the A-2186 silicone, regardless of the pigment used ( > 0.05). For pink MDX4-4210, the industrial and mechanical methods showed higher values of sorption compared with the conventional method ( < 0.05). For bronze MDX4-4210, the industrial method showed a higher sorption value compared with the conventional and mechanical methods ( < 0.05). For black MDX4-4210, there was no difference between incorporation methods based on sorption ( > 0.05). For pink MDX4-4210, the mechanical method showed a higher solubility value compared with the industrial and conventional methods ( < 0.05). For black MDX4-4210 and bronze MDX4-4210, there was no statistically significant difference between incorporation methods based on solubility (p > 0.05).
Based on sorption and solubility, for the A-2186 silicone, the conventional, mechanical, and industrial methods of pigment incorporation were equivalent. For the MDX4-4210 silicone, its results of sorption and solubility were varied, and further studies are recommended.
本研究旨在验证三种色素掺入方法(传统法、机械法和工业法)对MDX4 - 4210和A - 2186硅酮吸附和溶解性的影响。
分组基于所使用的硅酮(A - 2186和MDX4 - 4210)、固有色素(粉色、青铜色和黑色)以及色素掺入方法(传统法、机械法和工业法)。所有样品的尺寸为直径45毫米(ø)×厚度1毫米。在初始时以及老化1008小时后进行读数。
进行三因素方差分析和Tukey检验(α = 0.05)。
对于吸附和溶解性,无论使用何种色素,A - 2186硅酮的掺入方法之间均无差异(> 0.05)。对于粉色MDX4 - 4210,与传统方法相比,工业法和机械法显示出更高的吸附值(< 0.05)。对于青铜色MDX4 - 4210,与传统法和机械法相比,工业法显示出更高的吸附值(< 0.05)。对于黑色MDX4 - 4210,基于吸附的掺入方法之间无差异(> 0.05)。对于粉色MDX4 - 4210,与工业法和传统法相比,机械法显示出更高的溶解度值(< 0.05)。对于黑色MDX4 - 4210和青铜色MDX4 - 4210,基于溶解度的掺入方法之间无统计学显著差异(p > 0.05)。
基于吸附和溶解性,对于A - 2186硅酮,传统、机械和工业色素掺入方法是等效的。对于MDX4 - 4210硅酮,其吸附和溶解性结果各不相同,建议进一步研究。