Arthos J, Rubbert A, Rabin R L, Cicala C, Machado E, Wildt K, Hanbach M, Steenbeke T D, Swofford R, Farber J M, Fauci A S
Laboratory of Immunoregulation, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
J Virol. 2000 Jul;74(14):6418-24. doi: 10.1128/jvi.74.14.6418-6424.2000.
The capacity of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) envelopes to transduce signals through chemokine coreceptors on macrophages was examined by measuring the ability of recombinant envelope proteins to mobilize intracellular calcium stores. Both HIV and SIV envelopes mobilized calcium via interactions with CCR5. The kinetics of these responses were similar to those observed when macrophages were treated with MIP-1beta. Distinct differences in the capacity of envelopes to mediate calcium mobilization were observed. Envelopes derived from viruses capable of replicating in macrophages mobilized relatively high levels of calcium, while envelopes derived from viruses incapable of replicating in macrophages mobilized relatively low levels of calcium. The failure to efficiently mobilize calcium was not restricted to envelopes derived from CXCR4-utilizing isolates but also included envelopes derived from CCR5-utilizing isolates that fail to replicate in macrophages. We characterized one CCR5-utilizing isolate, 92MW959, which entered macrophages but failed to replicate. A recombinant envelope derived from this virus mobilized low levels of calcium. When macrophages were inoculated with 92MW959 in the presence of MIP-1alpha, viral replication was observed, indicating that a CC chemokine-mediated signal provided the necessary stimulus to allow the virus to complete its replication cycle. Although the role that envelope-CCR5 signal transduction plays in viral replication is not yet understood, it has been suggested that envelope-mediated signals facilitate early postfusion events in viral replication. The data presented here are consistent with this hypothesis and suggest that the differential capacity of viral envelopes to signal through CCR5 may influence their ability to replicate in macrophages.
通过测量重组包膜蛋白动员细胞内钙库的能力,研究了人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)和猴免疫缺陷病毒(SIV)包膜通过巨噬细胞上的趋化因子共受体转导信号的能力。HIV和SIV包膜均通过与CCR5相互作用来动员钙。这些反应的动力学与巨噬细胞用MIP-1β处理时观察到的相似。观察到包膜介导钙动员的能力存在明显差异。源自能够在巨噬细胞中复制的病毒的包膜动员相对高水平的钙,而源自不能在巨噬细胞中复制的病毒的包膜动员相对低水平的钙。不能有效动员钙的情况不仅限于源自利用CXCR4的分离株的包膜,还包括源自不能在巨噬细胞中复制的利用CCR5的分离株的包膜。我们鉴定了一种利用CCR5的分离株92MW959,它能进入巨噬细胞但不能复制。源自该病毒的重组包膜动员低水平的钙。当在MIP-1α存在下用92MW959接种巨噬细胞时,观察到病毒复制,这表明CC趋化因子介导的信号提供了使病毒完成其复制周期的必要刺激。虽然包膜-CCR5信号转导在病毒复制中所起的作用尚不清楚,但有人提出包膜介导的信号促进病毒复制中融合后早期事件。此处提供的数据与该假设一致,并表明病毒包膜通过CCR5信号转导的差异能力可能影响它们在巨噬细胞中复制的能力。