Barr R D, Dougherty W, Perry S
J Lab Clin Med. 1976 Dec;88(6):1032-40.
The present studies demonstrate that, while erythrocytes preferentially bind hexavalent 51Cr, leukocytes bind the trivalent form with equal avidity. Red cells may be saturated with label in contrast to the binding of 51Cr to leukocytes, which may be described by first-order kinetics. Hexavalent label is rapidly reduced in leukocytes in contradistinction to the finding in red cells. The nonreutilization of label by erythrocytes and leukocytes is not due to inappropriate valency but to protein binding of the label. Unlike nonleukemic cells, leukemic leukocytes elute a large fraction of their label. These factors have been largely overlooked in many previous clinical studies using labeled cells, and they are of sufficient quantitative importance to compromise seriously the validity of numerous earlier reports.
目前的研究表明,虽然红细胞优先结合六价51Cr,但白细胞以相同的亲和力结合三价形式。与51Cr与白细胞的结合不同,红细胞可能被标记饱和,51Cr与白细胞的结合可用一级动力学描述。与红细胞中的发现相反,六价标记在白细胞中迅速还原。红细胞和白细胞对标记的不重复利用不是由于价态不合适,而是由于标记与蛋白质的结合。与非白血病细胞不同,白血病白细胞洗脱其大部分标记。在许多先前使用标记细胞的临床研究中,这些因素在很大程度上被忽视了,它们在数量上具有足够的重要性,严重损害了许多早期报告的有效性。