Sommerville S M, Johnson N, Bryce S L, Journeaux S F, Morgan D A
Queensland Bone Bank, Brisbane, Australia.
Aust N Z J Surg. 2000 Jul;70(7):480-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1622.2000.01888.x.
Allograft donations are not uncommonly found to be contaminated. The issue of contaminated donations from live donors at the time of surgery, and the significance of this to the patient in terms of subsequent sepsis of the arthroplasty, were examined.
The donations of femoral heads to the Queensland Bone Bank over a 9-year period were reviewed, and the incidence and bacteriology of contamination were detailed. Clinical outcomes were determined for donors who had positive cultures at the time of retrieval and they were compared with those of culture-negative donors.
Between March 1987 and February 1996, 232 femoral heads were donated to the Queensland Bone Bank. Four specimens were sent for culture with each femoral head (surface swab of femoral head, acetabular swab, bone biopsy and capsule). In 51 cases, one or more positive cultures were obtained (22% contamination rate). The majority of organisms cultured were Staphylococcus epidermidis. One hundred and seventy donations came from surgery performed at the Princess Alexandra Hospital, and 40 femoral heads were considered contaminated. Deep infection was recorded in one of the 40 cases with contaminated donations and three out of 130 non-contaminated donations had subsequent septic episodes.
The contamination rate detailed in the present report is higher than in most series. This may be due to the fact that four bacteriological specimens are taken to assess contamination. Two of these specimens are tissue samples which yielded more positive results than did the two swabs. All other series take no more than two bacteriological specimens, which are usually bone swabs. These are shown to have a poor yield of positive cultures. Therefore there is a significant underestimation of contamination rates by other bone banks. This has implications for the recipients of bone from those banks, particularly when the allograft material is not secondarily sterilized. This is important given increasing allograft usage, and the increasing numbers of revision joint arthroplasty and impaction grafting procedures being performed. Sterilization of all bone by irradiation to 25 kGy is recommended.
同种异体移植供体被污染的情况并不罕见。本研究探讨了手术时活体供体的污染捐赠问题,以及这对患者随后关节置换术后败血症的影响。
回顾了9年间向昆士兰骨库捐赠股骨头的情况,详细记录了污染的发生率和细菌学情况。对采集时培养结果为阳性的供体的临床结局进行了评估,并与培养结果为阴性的供体进行了比较。
1987年3月至1996年2月期间,有232个股骨头捐赠给了昆士兰骨库。每个股骨头均取4个样本进行培养(股骨头表面拭子、髋臼拭子、骨活检和关节囊)。51例(污染率22%)获得了一个或多个阳性培养结果。培养出的大多数微生物为表皮葡萄球菌。170例捐赠来自亚历山德拉公主医院进行的手术,其中40个股骨头被认为受到污染。40例污染捐赠中有1例发生深部感染,130例未污染捐赠中有3例随后发生败血症。
本报告中详述的污染率高于大多数系列研究。这可能是因为评估污染时取了4个细菌学样本。其中2个样本是组织样本,其阳性结果比2个拭子更多。所有其他系列研究最多取2个细菌学样本,通常是骨拭子。结果显示其阳性培养结果的检出率较低。因此,其他骨库对污染率存在显著低估。这对那些骨库的骨接受者有影响,特别是当同种异体移植材料未进行二次灭菌时。鉴于同种异体移植的使用增加以及翻修关节置换术和嵌压植骨手术的数量不断增加,这一点很重要。建议对所有骨进行25千戈瑞的辐照灭菌。