• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Screening femoral heads from living donors: a prospective study comparing swab-agar versus bone fragment-broth culture.

作者信息

Saegeman Veroniek, Verhaegen Jan, Simon Jean-Pierre

机构信息

Department of Medical Diagnostic Sciences, University Hospital, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Acta Orthop Belg. 2011 Jun;77(3):381-5.

PMID:21846008
Abstract

Femoral heads are an important source of allograft bone used in reconstructive orthopaedic surgery. The sterility of donor material is of major importance for the recipient. Femoral heads intraoperatively retrieved during hip arthroplasty from medically screened living donors are routinely checked with a surface swab to exclude microbiological contamination. There is, however, evidence that swab cultures have limited sensitivity. We therefore prospectively compared two ways of screening femoral heads. Bacterial recovery from swabs in Amies transport medium taken intraoperatively, subsequently transported to the microbiology laboratory and inoculated on agar and in broth was compared with the recovery from a bone fragment also taken intraoperatively but immediately inoculated into Wilkins Chalgren broth. Forty femoral heads were tested with both methods. Bacteria were cultured neither from the femoral surface swabs nor from the femoral fragments. Consequently no distinct conclusions regarding the sensitivity of both techniques could be drawn. In addition the bacterial yield of two swabs in Amies transport medium streaked on a variety of culture media other than the conventional agar plates was also studied. Culturing of these swabs resulted in the detection of bacteria that are predominantly considered contaminants.

摘要

相似文献

1
Screening femoral heads from living donors: a prospective study comparing swab-agar versus bone fragment-broth culture.
Acta Orthop Belg. 2011 Jun;77(3):381-5.
2
Bacterial contamination of femoral head allografts from living donors.来自活体供体的股骨头同种异体移植物的细菌污染
Acta Orthop Scand. 2002 Apr;73(2):165-9. doi: 10.1080/000164702753671740.
3
Contamination of banked femoral head allograft: incidence, bacteriology and donor follow up.库存股骨头同种异体移植的污染:发生率、细菌学及供体随访
Aust N Z J Surg. 2000 Jul;70(7):480-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1622.2000.01888.x.
4
Comparison of microbiological culture methods in screening allograft tissue. Swab versus nutrient broth.同种异体移植组织筛查中微生物培养方法的比较。拭子法与营养肉汤法。
J Microbiol Methods. 2007 Aug;70(2):374-8. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2007.05.014. Epub 2007 May 29.
5
Microbiological cultures of allografts of the femoral head just before transplantation.股骨头异体移植术前的微生物培养。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Sep;89(9):1225-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B9.18864.
6
Microbiological culture results for the femoral head. Are they important to the donor?股骨头的微生物培养结果。它们对供体重要吗?
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004 Aug;86(6):797-800. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.86b6.14783.
7
Swab or biopsy samples for bioburden testing of allograft musculoskeletal tissue?用于同种异体肌肉骨骼组织生物负荷测试的拭子或活检样本?
Cell Tissue Bank. 2014 Dec;15(4):613-8. doi: 10.1007/s10561-014-9435-z. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
8
Evaluation of two types of swabs for sampling allograft musculoskeletal tissue.用于同种异体肌肉骨骼组织采样的两种拭子的评估。
ANZ J Surg. 2015 Jan;85(1-2):33-7. doi: 10.1111/ans.12661. Epub 2014 May 9.
9
Bioburden assessment of banked bone used for allografts.用于同种异体移植的储存骨的生物负荷评估。
Cell Tissue Bank. 2011 Feb;12(1):37-43. doi: 10.1007/s10561-009-9154-z. Epub 2009 Sep 17.
10
Infections after bone allograft surgery: a prospective study by a hospital bone bank using frozen femoral heads from living donors.同种异体骨移植手术后的感染:一家医院骨库对来自活体供体的冷冻股骨头进行的前瞻性研究。
Cell Tissue Bank. 2010 Aug;11(3):253-9. doi: 10.1007/s10561-009-9140-5. Epub 2009 Jun 27.

引用本文的文献

1
[A clinical radiological score for femoral head grafts : Establishment of the Tabea FK score to ensure the quality of human femoral head grafts].[股骨头移植的临床放射学评分:建立塔贝亚FK评分以确保人股骨头移植的质量]
Orthopade. 2021 Jun;50(6):471-480. doi: 10.1007/s00132-020-03941-5.
2
Microbiological culture findings of the femoral heads as a prognostic factor in the total hip replacement surgery.股骨头微生物培养结果作为全髋关节置换手术的预后因素。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2013 Jun;5(2):105-9. doi: 10.4055/cios.2013.5.2.105. Epub 2013 May 15.