Kirwan J F, Gouws P, Linnell A E, Crowston J, Bunce C
Department of Epidemiology and International Eye Health, Institute of Ophthalmology, London EC1V 9EL.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2000 Aug;84(8):894-8. doi: 10.1136/bjo.84.8.894.
To determine whether pharmacological mydriasis leads to a significant difference in interobserver agreement of optic disc measurement compared with examination without mydriasis.
A cross sectional study was performed with a pair of observers examining the optic disc of two randomised groups of patients, one group before diagnostic mydriasis, and the other afterwards. Horizontal and vertical disc diameters and cup/disc ratios were measured with a 78 dioptre lens. The study was repeated with another observer pair and two further groups of patients.
In study A 86 subjects were examined in total (52 without and 34 with mydriasis). In study B 87 subjects were examined (45 without and 42 with mydriasis). The 95% limits of agreement of the cup/disc ratio measurement differences were significantly larger without mydriasis (p<0.001 for all studies (F test)). For both studies examination after mydriasis gave significantly greater agreement for vertical and horizontal cup/disc ratios. The cases with good agreement (0.1 difference or better) for vertical cup/disc ratios were 37/52 (72%) and 34 /45 (76%) without mydriasis and 33/34 (97%) and 40/42 (95%) respectively with mydriasis. Similar differences were recorded for horizontal cup/disc ratios. Disc diameter measurement results showed similar differences in study A but were not affected by mydriasis in study B.
Examination of the optic disc without pharmacological mydriasis gives significantly poorer interobserver agreement. In this study, the mean 95% limits of agreement values for all cup/disc ratio values were 0.27 for examination without mydriasis and 0.13 for examination with mydriasis. A measure outside these limits would suggest a real difference. This study indicates that mydriasis is important for reproducible clinical examination in glaucoma.
确定与未散瞳检查相比,药物性散瞳是否会导致视盘测量的观察者间一致性出现显著差异。
进行了一项横断面研究,由一对观察者检查两组随机分组患者的视盘,一组在诊断性散瞳前检查,另一组在散瞳后检查。使用78屈光度的镜片测量视盘的水平和垂直直径以及杯盘比。该研究由另一对观察者和另外两组患者重复进行。
在研究A中,总共检查了86名受试者(52名未散瞳,34名散瞳)。在研究B中,检查了87名受试者(45名未散瞳,42名散瞳)。未散瞳时杯盘比测量差异的95%一致性界限显著更大(所有研究的p<0.001(F检验))。对于两项研究,散瞳后检查在垂直和水平杯盘比方面的一致性显著更高。垂直杯盘比一致性良好(差异为0.1或更小)的病例,未散瞳时分别为37/52(72%)和34/45(76%),散瞳时分别为33/34(97%)和40/42(95%)。水平杯盘比也记录到了类似差异。视盘直径测量结果在研究A中显示出类似差异,但在研究B中不受散瞳影响。
未使用药物性散瞳对视盘进行检查时,观察者间一致性显著较差。在本研究中,未散瞳检查时所有杯盘比值的平均95%一致性界限值为0.27,散瞳检查时为0.13。超出这些界限的测量值表明存在实际差异。本研究表明,散瞳对于青光眼可重复性临床检查很重要。