Singh R, Ho S Y
Department of Social Work and Psychology, National University of Singapore, Republic of Singapore.
Br J Soc Psychol. 2000 Jun;39 ( Pt 2):197-211. doi: 10.1348/014466600164426.
Dissimilarity and similarity between attitudes of the participants and a stranger were manipulated across two sets of issues to test the attraction, repulsion and similarity-dissimilarity asymmetry hypotheses. Participants (N = 192) judged social (liking, enjoyment of company) and intellectual (intelligence, general knowledge) attractiveness of the stranger. The similarity in the first set of attitudes x similarity in the second set of attitudes effect emerged in social attraction, but not in intellectual attraction. Stated simply, dissimilarity had a greater weight than similarity in social attraction, but equal weight in intellectual attraction. These results support the similarity-dissimilarity asymmetry hypothesis that predicts dissimilarity-repulsion to be stronger than similarity-attraction. However, they reject (1) the attraction hypothesis that dissimilarity and similarity produce equal and opposite effects on social attraction; and (2) the repulsion hypothesis that only dissimilar attitudes affect social attraction by leading to repulsion. An equal weighting of dissimilarity and similarity in intellectual attraction further suggested that the similarity-dissimilarity asymmetry on social attraction is reflective of a stronger avoidance response in the Darwinian sense.
在两组问题中,对参与者与陌生人态度之间的差异和相似性进行了操控,以检验吸引力、排斥力和相似性-差异性不对称假设。参与者(N = 192)对陌生人的社交吸引力(喜欢程度、对陪伴的享受程度)和智力吸引力(智力、常识)进行了评判。在社交吸引力方面出现了第一组态度的相似性×第二组态度的相似性效应,但在智力吸引力方面未出现。简单来说,在社交吸引力中,差异比相似性的权重更大,但在智力吸引力中权重相等。这些结果支持了相似性-差异性不对称假设,该假设预测差异-排斥比相似性-吸引更强。然而,它们拒绝了:(1)差异和相似性对社交吸引力产生相等且相反影响的吸引力假设;以及(2)只有不同态度通过导致排斥来影响社交吸引力的排斥假设。在智力吸引力中差异和相似性的权重相等,这进一步表明社交吸引力中的相似性-差异性不对称反映了达尔文意义上更强的回避反应。