• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同人群在欺凌行为中的差异及其与社会地位的关系。

Person-group dissimilarity in involvement in bullying and its relation with social status.

作者信息

Sentse Miranda, Scholte Ron, Salmivalli Christina, Voeten Marinus

机构信息

Department of Sociology and Interuniversity Center for Social Science Theory and Methodology (ICS), University of Groningen, Grote Rozenstraat 31, 9712 TG, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2007 Dec;35(6):1009-19. doi: 10.1007/s10802-007-9150-3. Epub 2007 Jun 23.

DOI:10.1007/s10802-007-9150-3
PMID:17588201
Abstract

This study tested a person-group dissimilarity model for the relation between peer preference on the one hand, and bullying and victimization on the other. This model accounts for both individual and group (i.e., classroom) factors and postulates that children will be rejected by their peers when they display behaviors that deviate from the group norm. We tested the model in a sample of 2,578 early adolescents in 109 middle school classrooms. Multilevel analysis was used to account for our nested data when examining individual and group effects simultaneously in cross-level interaction terms. The results supported our hypotheses based on the dissimilarity model. Classroom norms of behavior appeared to affect the relation between involvement in bullying and peer preference, in that early adolescents who bullied were more likely to be rejected by their peers in a classroom where bullying was non-normative. In classrooms where bullying was normative, adolescents who bullied were less likely to be rejected or were even liked by their peers (i.e., positive scores on peer preference). The same was true for victimization, although victims still had low scores on peer preference even when victimization was normative. Theoretical and practical implications of these results are discussed in terms of directions for future research and intervention in bullying.

摘要

本研究检验了一种人-群体差异模型,该模型用于探讨同伴偏好与欺凌及受欺负行为之间的关系。此模型兼顾了个体因素和群体(即班级)因素,并假定当儿童表现出偏离群体规范的行为时,他们会被同伴排斥。我们在109个中学班级的2578名青少年早期样本中对该模型进行了检验。在交叉水平交互项中同时考察个体和群体效应时,采用了多层分析来处理我们的嵌套数据。结果支持了基于差异模型的假设。课堂行为规范似乎会影响欺凌行为与同伴偏好之间的关系,具体表现为,在欺凌行为不规范的班级中,实施欺凌的青少年早期更容易被同伴排斥。在欺凌行为规范的班级中,实施欺凌的青少年被同伴排斥的可能性较小,甚至受到同伴喜欢(即同伴偏好得分为正数)。受欺负行为也是如此,尽管即使受欺负行为规范,受害者在同伴偏好方面的得分仍然较低。本文从未来欺凌研究和干预的方向方面讨论了这些结果的理论和实践意义。

相似文献

1
Person-group dissimilarity in involvement in bullying and its relation with social status.不同人群在欺凌行为中的差异及其与社会地位的关系。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2007 Dec;35(6):1009-19. doi: 10.1007/s10802-007-9150-3. Epub 2007 Jun 23.
2
Childhood bullying involvement and exposure to intimate partner violence.童年时期参与欺凌行为以及遭受亲密伴侣暴力
Pediatrics. 2006 Aug;118(2):e235-42. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2509.
3
A friend in need: the role of friendship quality as a protective factor in peer victimization and bullying.患难见真情:友谊质量在同伴受害和欺凌中作为保护因素的作用。
J Interpers Violence. 2005 Jun;20(6):701-12. doi: 10.1177/0886260504272897.
4
Psychosocial Maladjustment at Student and Classroom Level as Indicators of Peer Victimization.学生层面和课堂层面的心理社会适应不良作为同伴受害的指标
Violence Vict. 2017 Oct 1;32(5):842-857. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-15-00166. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
5
Student-, classroom-, and school-level risk factors for victimization.学生层面、课堂层面和学校层面的受害风险因素。
J Sch Psychol. 2013 Jun;51(3):421-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2013.02.002. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
6
Bullying and victimization in early adolescence: relations to social information processing patterns.青少年早期的欺凌和受害:与社会信息处理模式的关系。
Aggress Behav. 2013 Nov-Dec;39(6):482-92. doi: 10.1002/ab.21494. Epub 2013 Jul 1.
7
Adolescents' perception of bullying: who is the victim? Who is the bully? What can be done to stop bullying?青少年对欺凌行为的认知:谁是受害者?谁是霸凌者?如何才能制止欺凌行为?
Adolescence. 2007 Winter;42(168):749-61.
8
Demographic differences in the prevalence, co-occurrence, and correlates of adolescent bullying at school.学校中青少年欺凌行为在患病率、共现情况及相关因素方面的人口统计学差异。
J Sch Health. 2007 Nov;77(9):623-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2007.00242.x.
9
Defending Victims of Bullying in Early Adolescence: A Multilevel Analysis.保护青少年早期受欺凌者:多层次分析。
J Youth Adolesc. 2018 Sep;47(9):1926-1937. doi: 10.1007/s10964-018-0869-7. Epub 2018 May 29.
10
An analysis of the relationship between victimization and violent behavior at school.校园中受害与暴力行为之间关系的分析。
Span J Psychol. 2013;16:E22. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2013.40.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding the situation of bystanders to inform anti-bullying interventions.了解旁观者的情况以指导反欺凌干预措施。
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 14;15:1116860. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1116860. eCollection 2024.
2
The Healthy Context Paradox Between Bullying and Emotional Adaptation: A Moderated Mediating Effect.欺凌与情绪适应之间的健康情境悖论:一种有调节的中介效应
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2024 Apr 16;17:1661-1675. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S444400. eCollection 2024.
3
Bullying Victimization and Adolescent Depression, Anxiety and Stress: The Mediation of Cognitive Emotion Regulation.

本文引用的文献

1
Classroom contextual effects of race on children's peer nominations.种族对儿童同伴提名的课堂情境效应。
Child Dev. 2006 Sep-Oct;77(5):1325-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00937.x.
2
Beyond the individual: the impact of ethnic context and classroom behavioral norms on victims' adjustment.超越个体:种族背景和课堂行为规范对受害者适应的影响。
Dev Psychol. 2004 Nov;40(6):1159-72. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.40.6.1159.
3
The role of classroom norms in contextualizing the relations of children's social behaviors to peer acceptance.
欺凌受害与青少年抑郁、焦虑和压力:认知情绪调节的中介作用
Children (Basel). 2023 Dec 7;10(12):1897. doi: 10.3390/children10121897.
4
The healthy context paradox of bullying victimization and academic adjustment among Chinese adolescents: A moderated mediation model.中国青少年受欺凌与学业适应的健康背景悖论:一个有调节的中介模型。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 18;18(8):e0290452. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290452. eCollection 2023.
5
Bullying perpetration and social status in the peer group: A meta-analysis.同伴群体中的欺凌行为和社会地位:一项元分析。
J Adolesc. 2023 Jan;95(1):34-55. doi: 10.1002/jad.12109. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
6
Does defending victimized peers put youth at risk of being victimized?保护受害同伴会使青少年自身受害的风险增加吗?
Child Dev. 2023 Mar;94(2):380-394. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13866. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
7
Peer victimization and well-being as a function of same-ethnicity classmates and classroom social norms: Revisiting person × environment mismatch theory.同伴侵害与同种族同学和课堂社会规范对幸福感的影响:重新审视人与环境不匹配理论。
Dev Psychol. 2021 Dec;57(12):2050-2066. doi: 10.1037/dev0001161.
8
Disaggregating the Between-Person and Within-Person Associations Between Peer Acceptance and Academic Achievement in Early Elementary School.剖析小学低年级阶段同伴接纳与学业成绩之间的个体间及个体内关联。
J Appl Dev Psychol. 2022 Jan-Feb;78. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2021.101357. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
9
Bullying Prevention in Adolescence: Solutions and New Challenges from the Past Decade.青少年欺凌预防:过去十年的解决方案和新挑战。
J Res Adolesc. 2021 Dec;31(4):1023-1046. doi: 10.1111/jora.12688.
10
Social Aggression and Social Position in Middle Childhood and Early Adolescence: Burning Bridges or Building Them?童年中期和青春期早期的社交攻击与社会地位:破坏关系还是建立关系?
J Early Adolesc. 2010 Feb 1;30(1):122-137. doi: 10.1177/0272431609350924. Epub 2009 Nov 23.
课堂规范在将儿童社会行为与同伴接纳的关系置于具体情境中的作用。
Dev Psychol. 2004 Sep;40(5):691-702. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.40.5.691.
4
Examination of peer-group contextual effects on aggression during early adolescence.青少年早期同伴群体情境对攻击性影响的研究。
Child Dev. 2003 Jan-Feb;74(1):205-20. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00531.
5
Japanese and American children's evaluations of peer exclusion, tolerance of differences, and prescriptions for conformity.
Child Dev. 2002 Nov-Dec;73(6):1788-802. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.t01-1-00506.
6
Children's perceptions of popular and unpopular peers: a multimethod assessment.儿童对受欢迎和不受欢迎同伴的认知:一种多方法评估
Dev Psychol. 2002 Sep;38(5):635-47. doi: 10.1037//0012-1649.38.5.635.
7
Peer rejection and aggression and early starter models of conduct disorder.同伴排斥与攻击行为以及品行障碍的早期起病模型。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2002 Jun;30(3):217-30. doi: 10.1023/a:1015198612049.
8
Attitudes and attraction: a new test of the attraction, repulsion and similarity-dissimilarity asymmetry hypotheses.态度与吸引力:对吸引力、排斥力及相似-相异不对称假设的一项新测试。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2000 Jun;39 ( Pt 2):197-211. doi: 10.1348/014466600164426.
9
Subtypes of victims and aggressors in children's peer groups.儿童同伴群体中受害者和攻击者的亚型。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2000 Apr;28(2):181-92. doi: 10.1023/a:1005174831561.
10
The relation between behavior problems and peer preference in different classroom contexts. Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group.不同课堂环境下行为问题与同伴偏好之间的关系。预防行为问题研究小组。
Child Dev. 1999 Jan-Feb;70(1):169-82. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00013.