Baum S
Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute, Geographical Science and Planning, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane.
Accid Anal Prev. 2000 Sep;32(5):689-94. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(99)00106-2.
Using data from a community survey together with data from a survey of drink-driving offenders, this paper compares the attitudes and knowledge of two matched samples on a number of drink driving issues. The total sample (149 offenders and 149 community sample respondents) were interviewed using a survey instrument containing a number of comparable questions. The offender sample were interviewed by trained interviewers in a face-to-face format, while the general community sample were interviewed using a computer aided telephone interview system. The specific issues dealt with include: a) knowledge of safe drinking and blood alcohol consumption (BAC) levels; b) attitudes towards strategies for avoiding drink driving; and c) general attitudes regarding drink driving. The analysis uses logistic regression to investigate the differences between the responses given by the two samples. The findings illustrate a number of significant differences in knowledge and attitudes between offenders and the general community.
本文利用社区调查数据以及酒驾违法者调查数据，比较了两个匹配样本在若干酒驾问题上的态度和知识。总样本（149名违法者和149名社区样本受访者）使用包含若干可比问题的调查工具进行了访谈。违法者样本由经过培训的访谈员以面对面的形式进行访谈，而普通社区样本则使用计算机辅助电话访谈系统进行访谈。所涉及的具体问题包括：a）安全饮酒和血液酒精含量（BAC）水平的知识；b）对避免酒驾策略的态度；c）对酒驾的总体态度。分析使用逻辑回归来研究两个样本给出的回答之间的差异。研究结果表明，违法者与普通社区在知识和态度上存在一些显著差异。
