Stephens A N, Bishop C A, Liu S, Fitzharris M
Monash University Accident Research Centre, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
Monash University Accident Research Centre, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Jan;98:241-251. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.10.011. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
Alcohol contributes to approximately 30% of all serious crashes. While the majority of drivers acknowledge the risks associated with drink-driving, a significant proportion of the population continue to engage in this behaviour. Attitudes towards drink-driving as well as personal alcohol consumption patterns are likely to underpin a driver's decision to drink-drive. These associations were explored in the current study.
A large (N=2994) cross-sectional online survey of a representative sample of drivers in Australia was conducted. Participants provided information about their own alcohol consumption patterns, drink-driving behaviour as well as attitudes towards drink-driving (own and others) and enforcement strategies.
Alcohol consumption patterns differed according to age, gender and work status. Drivers who reported drink-driving behaviour and had high risk alcohol consumption patterns were less likely to agree that drink-driving leads to increased crash risk and more likely to agree they drink and drive when they believed they could get away with it. In contrast, drivers who did not report drink-driving and had low risk consumption patterns were more likely to report that the enforcement strategies are too lenient. Binary logistic regression showed that high risk alcohol consumption patterns and agreement from drivers that they drink and drive when they believe they can get away with it had the strongest associations with drink-driving. These findings highlight the relationships between one's drinking patterns, drink-drive behaviour and attitudes towards drink-driving and drink-driving enforcement CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The patterns of associations that emerged suggest that drink-driving is the expression of a broader health issue for the most "at-risk" cohort of drinkers. The decision to drink and drive may result from a need borne from an alcohol dependent lifestyle exacerbated by a social acceptability of the behaviour and positive attitudes towards one's ability to drink-drive with few adverse consequences. Therefore, the broader alcohol consumption patterns of drink-drivers needs to be considered when targeting drink-drive reductions.
在所有严重车祸中,约30% 是由酒精造成的。虽然大多数司机都承认酒后驾车的风险,但仍有相当一部分人继续这种行为。对酒后驾车的态度以及个人饮酒模式可能是司机决定酒后驾车的基础。本研究对这些关联进行了探讨。
对澳大利亚有代表性的司机样本进行了一项大型(N = 2994)横断面在线调查。参与者提供了有关他们自己的饮酒模式、酒后驾车行为以及对酒后驾车(自己和他人)和执法策略的态度的信息。
饮酒模式因年龄、性别和工作状况而异。报告有酒后驾车行为且饮酒模式具有高风险的司机不太可能认同酒后驾车会增加撞车风险,并且更有可能认同当他们认为可以侥幸逃脱时就会酒后驾车。相比之下,未报告有酒后驾车行为且饮酒模式风险较低的司机更有可能报告执法策略过于宽松。二元逻辑回归显示,高风险饮酒模式以及司机认同当他们认为可以侥幸逃脱时就会酒后驾车与酒后驾车的关联最为紧密。这些发现凸显了个人饮酒模式、酒后驾车行为以及对酒后驾车和酒后驾车执法态度之间的关系。
所呈现的关联模式表明,对于最“高危”的饮酒者群体而言,酒后驾车是一个更广泛健康问题的表现。酒后驾车的决定可能源于一种由依赖酒精的生活方式所产生的需求,这种生活方式因社会对该行为的接受度以及对个人酒后驾车能力且几乎没有不良后果的积极态度而加剧。因此,在以减少酒后驾车为目标时,需要考虑酒后驾车者更广泛的饮酒模式。