Stensland J, Speedie S M, Ideker M, House J, Thompson T
Department of Applied Economics, University of Minnesota Medical School, USA.
Telemed J. 1999 Fall;5(3):245-56. doi: 10.1089/107830299311998.
This study compares the costs of offering outpatient care to primarily orthopedic and dermatology patients via live, interactive telemedicine to the estimated costs of direct face-to-face care for the same patients.
A simple, yet detailed methodology was used to evaluate the cost of adding telemedicine to a health care delivery system, using a "hub-and-spoke" model located in Minnesota. The costs and cost savings of telemedicine were evaluated from the perspectives of patients, providers, insurers, employers, and society as a whole. Sensitivity analysis was used to investigate the impact of various factors on the model.
The variable cost of a telemedicine referral was $144, versus an estimated face-to-face referral cost of $183. Reductions in patient travel costs and in lost employee productivity were the principal benefits of the system. The break-even point, where total costs equal total cost savings, equalled 1,449 consultations annually. Sensitivity analyses indicated that the breakeven point varies from a low of 152 telemedicine consultations for a "best case" scenario to no possible breakeven point for a "worst case" scenario.
At the system's current level of 300 consultations per year, the telemedicine system is estimated to add $45,000 to society's costs of providing medical care for these patients. The additional cost is primarily due to personnel expenses and an increase in the volume of specialty care. Patients see specialists more often due to improved access to care and lower transportation costs. Providers bear the cost while patients and employers enjoy substantial savings.
本研究比较了通过实时交互式远程医疗为主要骨科和皮肤科患者提供门诊护理的成本与为相同患者提供直接面对面护理的估计成本。
采用一种简单但详细的方法,以位于明尼苏达州的“中心辐射”模式评估将远程医疗添加到医疗保健提供系统中的成本。从患者、提供者、保险公司、雇主和整个社会的角度评估了远程医疗的成本和成本节约情况。使用敏感性分析来研究各种因素对模型的影响。
远程医疗转诊的可变成本为144美元,而估计的面对面转诊成本为183美元。患者差旅费和员工生产力损失的减少是该系统的主要益处。总成本等于总节约成本的盈亏平衡点为每年1449次会诊。敏感性分析表明,盈亏平衡点从“最佳情况”下的低至152次远程医疗会诊到“最坏情况”下的无盈亏平衡点不等。
在该系统目前每年300次会诊的水平下,远程医疗系统估计会使社会为这些患者提供医疗护理的成本增加45,000美元。额外成本主要归因于人员费用和专科护理量的增加。由于获得护理的机会改善和交通成本降低,患者更频繁地看专科医生。提供者承担成本,而患者和雇主则节省大量费用。