• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于接受姑息性放疗的癌症患者,初级保健医生与放射肿瘤学家之间的沟通。

Communication between primary care physicians and radiation oncologists regarding patients with cancer treated with palliative radiotherapy.

作者信息

Barnes E A, Hanson J, Neumann C M, Nekolaichuk C L, Bruera E

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, Division of Palliative Care Medicine, Grey Nuns Community Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2000 Aug;18(15):2902-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.15.2902.

DOI:10.1200/JCO.2000.18.15.2902
PMID:10920139
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the satisfaction and information needs of primary care physicians (PCPs) regarding communication with radiation oncologists (ROs), with respect to patients who receive palliative radiotherapy (RT). A selected objective was to evaluate the agreement between PCPs' expectations and the content of the RO letter sent after completion of RT. PCPs' knowledge of the role of palliative RT and their awareness of available patient support services were also determined.

METHODS

The PCPs of patients discharged from the Cross Cancer Institute after receiving palliative RT were surveyed using a mail-out questionnaire. Questions regarding communication, RT knowledge, and awareness of support services were asked. The corresponding RO letter was reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 148 PCPs were identified and were mailed questionnaires, with 114 (77%) responding. Overall, 80% (87 of 109) of PCPs found the RO letter to be useful in patient management. However, there was poor (< 53%) agreement between PCPs' expectations and the actual content of the RO letter. Knowledge of the indications and effectiveness of palliative RT was limited, with PCPs obtaining a median score of 4 of a possible 8. Only 27% (31 of 114) of PCPs were aware of all five of the patient support services listed.

CONCLUSION

Results show that although the majority of PCPs found the RO letter useful, they believed that the letter lacked important information while containing unnecessary details. Communication between PCPs and ROs needs improvement, especially considering that PCPs seem to have limited knowledge of palliative RT.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估初级保健医生(PCP)在与放射肿瘤学家(RO)就接受姑息性放疗(RT)的患者进行沟通方面的满意度和信息需求。一个特定目标是评估PCP的期望与放疗结束后发送的RO信件内容之间的一致性。还确定了PCP对姑息性放疗作用的了解以及他们对现有患者支持服务的认知。

方法

对在接受姑息性放疗后从十字癌症研究所出院的患者的PCP进行邮寄问卷调查。询问了有关沟通、放疗知识和支持服务认知的问题。对相应的RO信件进行了审查。

结果

共确定了148名PCP并向其邮寄问卷,114名(77%)做出回应。总体而言,80%(109名中的87名)的PCP认为RO信件对患者管理有用。然而,PCP的期望与RO信件的实际内容之间的一致性较差(<53%)。对姑息性放疗的适应症和有效性的了解有限,PCP在可能的8分中获得的中位数分数为4分。只有27%(114名中的31名)的PCP知晓列出的所有五项患者支持服务。

结论

结果表明,尽管大多数PCP认为RO信件有用,但他们认为信件缺乏重要信息,同时包含不必要的细节。PCP与RO之间的沟通需要改善,特别是考虑到PCP对姑息性放疗的了解似乎有限。

相似文献

1
Communication between primary care physicians and radiation oncologists regarding patients with cancer treated with palliative radiotherapy.关于接受姑息性放疗的癌症患者,初级保健医生与放射肿瘤学家之间的沟通。
J Clin Oncol. 2000 Aug;18(15):2902-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.15.2902.
2
Comparisons of patient and physician expectations for cancer survivorship care.患者与医生对癌症生存护理期望的比较。
J Clin Oncol. 2009 May 20;27(15):2489-95. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.3232. Epub 2009 Mar 30.
3
Primary care physicians and oncologists are partners in cancer announcement.初级保健医生和肿瘤学家是癌症诊断告知中的合作伙伴。
Support Care Cancer. 2016 Jun;24(6):2473-9. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-3049-2. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
4
Primary care and communication in shared cancer care: a qualitative study.初级保健和共同癌症护理中的沟通:一项定性研究。
Am J Manag Care. 2011 Apr;17(4):259-65.
5
What Are Medical Students in the United States Learning About Radiation Oncology? Results of a Multi-Institutional Survey.美国医学生对放射肿瘤学了解多少?一项多机构调查的结果。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Feb 1;94(2):235-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.10.008. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
6
Identifying important health system factors that influence primary care practitioners' referrals for cancer suspicion: a European cross-sectional survey.识别影响基层医疗从业者对癌症疑似病例转诊的重要卫生系统因素:一项欧洲横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 5;8(9):e022904. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022904.
7
Attitudes toward integration of complementary and alternative medicine in primary care: perspectives of patients, physicians and complementary practitioners.对补充和替代医学融入初级保健的态度:患者、医生和补充医学从业者的观点。
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Mar;70(3):395-402. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.11.019. Epub 2008 Jan 16.
8
Associations among cancer survivorship discussions, patient and physician expectations, and receipt of follow-up care.癌症生存讨论、患者和医生期望与接受后续护理之间的关联。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 May 20;28(15):2577-83. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.4549. Epub 2010 Apr 20.
9
Differences between primary care physicians' and oncologists' knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding the care of cancer survivors.初级保健医生和肿瘤医生在癌症幸存者护理方面的知识、态度和实践之间的差异。
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Dec;26(12):1403-10. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1808-4. Epub 2011 Jul 22.
10
A mixed-methods examination of communication between oncologists and primary care providers among primary care physicians in underserved communities.对服务不足社区的初级保健医生中肿瘤学家与初级保健提供者之间沟通情况的混合方法研究。
Cancer. 2015 Mar 15;121(6):908-15. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29131. Epub 2014 Nov 6.

引用本文的文献

1
A Web-Based Training Intervention for Primary Care Providers on Preparing Patients for Cancer Treatment Decisions and Conversations About Clinical Trials: Evaluation of a Pilot Study Using Mixed Methods and Follow-Up.一项针对初级保健提供者的基于网络的培训干预措施,内容为帮助患者为癌症治疗决策及关于临床试验的对话做好准备:一项采用混合方法和随访的试点研究评估
JMIR Med Educ. 2025 Jul 17;11:e66892. doi: 10.2196/66892.
2
Correspondence between primary and secondary care about patients with cancer: A qualitative mixed-methods analysis.癌症患者初级保健与二级保健之间的沟通:一项定性混合方法分析。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 Jan;28(1):e12903. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12903. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
3
Primary care physicians' attitudes and beliefs about cancer clinical trials.
初级保健医生对癌症临床试验的态度和信念。
Clin Trials. 2017 Oct;14(5):518-525. doi: 10.1177/1740774517717722. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
4
Practice patterns and perceptions of survivorship care in Canadian genitourinary oncology: A multidisciplinary perspective.加拿大泌尿生殖系统肿瘤学幸存者护理的实践模式与认知:多学科视角
Can Urol Assoc J. 2014 Nov;8(11-12):409-17. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.2279.
5
A mixed-methods examination of communication between oncologists and primary care providers among primary care physicians in underserved communities.对服务不足社区的初级保健医生中肿瘤学家与初级保健提供者之间沟通情况的混合方法研究。
Cancer. 2015 Mar 15;121(6):908-15. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29131. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
6
Psychologists' views of inter-disciplinary psychosocial communication within the cancer care team.心理学家对癌症护理团队中跨学科心理社会沟通的看法。
Support Care Cancer. 2014 Dec;22(12):3193-200. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2299-8. Epub 2014 Jun 28.
7
Interventions to improve continuity of care in the follow-up of patients with cancer.改善癌症患者随访中医疗连续性的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jul 11;2012(7):CD007672. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007672.pub2.
8
Patterns of referral and knowledge of palliative radiotherapy in Alberta.阿尔伯塔省的姑息性放疗转诊模式和知识。
Can Fam Physician. 2012 Feb;58(2):e113-22.
9
Caring for survivors of breast cancer: perspective of the primary care physician.关爱乳腺癌幸存者:基层医生的视角。
Curr Oncol. 2011 Oct;18(5):e218-26. doi: 10.3747/co.v18i5.793.
10
Patient, primary care physician and specialist expectations of primary care physician involvement in cancer care.患者、初级保健医生和专家对初级保健医生参与癌症护理的期望。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jan;27(1):8-15. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1777-7. Epub 2011 Jul 13.