• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青少年冒险行为与人格五因素模型

Adolescent risk-taking and the five-factor model of personality.

作者信息

Gullone E, Moore S

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

J Adolesc. 2000 Aug;23(4):393-407. doi: 10.1006/jado.2000.0327.

DOI:10.1006/jado.2000.0327
PMID:10936013
Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the links between adolescent risk-taking and personality in a comprehensive manner, as opposed to focusing on any one particular risk or personality factor as has occurred in much previous research. We conceptualized risk-taking broadly through use of the Adolescent Risk Questionnaire (ARQ) which yields information relating to risk judgements and behaviours in four areas (i.e. thrill-seeking risk behaviours, reckless risks, rebellious risks and antisocial risks). Personality was conceptualized using the Five-factor Model of personality, a comprehensive trait model of personality. The ARQ and the NEO Five-factor Inventory were administered to 459 school-based adolescents aged 11 to 18 years. Consistent with past research, younger adolescents and girls generally reported engaging in risk behaviours less frequently than older adolescents and boys. Also, younger adolescents and girls generally rated the ARQ behaviours as more risky than their older male counterparts. This was in line with the significant negative correlations found between risk judgements and risk behaviours of all types. Also consistent with past research, few age differences were found for the personality traits. Sex differences were evident, with female adolescents scoring higher on neuroticism, agreeableness and conscientiousness than male adolescents. Together, risk judgements, personality factors, age and sex were found to be significant predictors of risk behaviours; however, the personality factor of significance was found to differ depending upon the risk type. This was also true for age and sex which differed in importance depending upon the risk type. Overall, these factors were most successful in predicting rebellious risk-taking and least successful in predicting thrill-seeking.

摘要

本研究的目的是全面调查青少年冒险行为与人格之间的联系,而不是像以往许多研究那样只关注某一个特定的风险或人格因素。我们通过使用青少年风险问卷(ARQ)对冒险行为进行了广泛的概念化,该问卷能提供与四个领域(即寻求刺激的风险行为、鲁莽风险、叛逆风险和反社会风险)的风险判断及行为相关的信息。人格则使用人格五因素模型进行概念化,这是一个全面的人格特质模型。我们对459名年龄在11至18岁的在校青少年施测了ARQ和大五人格量表。与过去的研究一致,青少年和女孩通常比年长青少年和男孩报告的冒险行为频率更低。此外,青少年和女孩通常认为ARQ行为比年长男性更具风险。这与各类风险判断和风险行为之间显著的负相关一致。同样与过去的研究一致,人格特质方面几乎没有发现年龄差异。性别差异明显,女性青少年在神经质、宜人性和尽责性方面的得分高于男性青少年。总之,风险判断、人格因素、年龄和性别被发现是风险行为的重要预测因素;然而,发现具有显著意义的人格因素因风险类型而异。年龄和性别也是如此,其重要性因风险类型而异。总体而言,这些因素在预测叛逆冒险行为方面最成功,而在预测寻求刺激方面最不成功。

相似文献

1
Adolescent risk-taking and the five-factor model of personality.青少年冒险行为与人格五因素模型
J Adolesc. 2000 Aug;23(4):393-407. doi: 10.1006/jado.2000.0327.
2
[Contribution of dissociative symptoms to antisocial behavior in a sample of high-school students].[解离症状对一组高中生反社会行为的影响]
Encephale. 2009 Feb;35(1):52-6. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2007.12.006. Epub 2008 Apr 2.
3
Risky business: executive function, personality, and reckless behavior during adolescence and emerging adulthood.风险行为:青少年期及成年早期的执行功能、人格与鲁莽行为
Behav Neurosci. 2011 Dec;125(6):970-8. doi: 10.1037/a0025768. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
4
[Contributions of parental and social influences to cannabis use in a non-clinical sample of adolescents].[父母及社会影响对青少年非临床样本中大麻使用的作用]
Encephale. 2008 Jan;34(1):8-16. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2007.01.002. Epub 2007 Sep 4.
5
Associations among adolescent risk behaviours and self-esteem in six domains.六个领域中青少年风险行为与自尊之间的关联。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2004 Nov;45(8):1454-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00851.x.
6
Reliability, validity, incidence and impact of temporormandibular pain disorders in adolescents.青少年颞下颌疼痛障碍的可靠性、有效性、发病率及影响
Swed Dent J Suppl. 2007(183):7-86.
7
Targeting adolescent risk-taking behaviors: the contributions of egocentrism and sensation-seeking.针对青少年冒险行为:自我中心主义和寻求刺激的影响。
J Adolesc. 2000 Aug;23(4):439-61. doi: 10.1006/jado.2000.0330.
8
Brief report: risk-taking behaviors in a non-western urban adolescent sample.简短报告:非西方城市青少年样本中的冒险行为
J Adolesc. 2005 Oct;28(5):671-6. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.01.010.
9
Adolescents' preventive care experiences before entry into the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP).青少年在加入儿童健康保险计划(SCHIP)之前的预防保健经历。
Pediatrics. 2003 Dec;112(6 Pt 2):e533.
10
[Survey on sexual behavior by Congolese and French high-school students in an AIDS context].[刚果和法国高中生在艾滋病背景下的性行为调查]
Sante. 2001 Jan-Feb;11(1):49-55.

引用本文的文献

1
Risking for Good: A Three-Wave Within-Person Analysis of the Reciprocal Relations Among Prosocial Risk Taking, Positive Risk Taking, and Prosocial Leadership.为善冒险:亲社会冒险、积极冒险与亲社会领导力之间互惠关系的三波个体内分析
J Youth Adolesc. 2025 Aug 20. doi: 10.1007/s10964-025-02239-z.
2
Positive and negative risk-taking behaviors in adolescents: Distinct characteristics, interrelationships, and influencing factors.青少年的正负冒险行为:不同特征、相互关系及影响因素。
World J Psychiatry. 2025 Jun 19;15(6):106944. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i6.106944.
3
Positive risk taking across the world.
全球范围内积极的冒险行为。
J Res Adolesc. 2025 Jun;35(2):e70021. doi: 10.1111/jora.70021.
4
Exploring Shared and Unique Predictors of Positive and Negative Risk-Taking Behaviors Among Chinese Adolescents Through Machine-Learning Approaches: Discovering Gender and Age Variations.通过机器学习方法探索中国青少年积极和消极冒险行为的共同及独特预测因素:发现性别和年龄差异
J Youth Adolesc. 2025 May;54(5):1109-1127. doi: 10.1007/s10964-024-02120-5. Epub 2024 Dec 11.
5
Risk-taking Behaviour: The Role of Dark Triad Traits, Impulsivity, Sensation Seeking and Adverse Childhood Experience.冒险行为:黑暗三性格特质、冲动性、寻求刺激及童年不良经历的作用
Acta Inform Med. 2023;31(4):292-299. doi: 10.5455/aim.2023.31.292-299.
6
Risky Sexual Behaviors as a Transaction of Individual Differences and Situational Context.风险性行为是个体差异和情境背景的交易。
Arch Sex Behav. 2023 Aug;52(6):2539-2560. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02592-9. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
7
Do investors' personalities predict market winners? Experimental setting and machine learning analysis.投资者的性格能预测市场赢家吗?实验设置与机器学习分析。
Heliyon. 2023 Apr 5;9(4):e15273. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15273. eCollection 2023 Apr.
8
A Mixed-Methods Approach to Refining and Measuring the Construct of Positive Risk-Taking in Adolescence.一种混合方法,用于完善和测量青少年积极冒险行为的结构。
J Res Adolesc. 2023 Jun;33(2):680-700. doi: 10.1111/jora.12807. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
9
Why take the risk? Exploring the psychosocial determinants of floodwater driving.为何要冒险?探究洪水驾车的社会心理决定因素。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 19;13:913790. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.913790. eCollection 2022.
10
How Optimism Bias and Safety Climate Influence the Risk-Taking Behavior of Construction Workers.乐观偏差和安全氛围如何影响建筑工人的冒险行为。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 22;19(3):1243. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031243.