Kojima J, Katoh H, Taniguchi T, Kawai H, Fukui H, Ohnishi A, Onodera K
Department of Medical Development, Nikken Chemicals Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 2000 May;22(4):247-52. doi: 10.1358/mf.2000.22.4.584458.
The effects of the speed of intravenous infusion on the pharmacokinetics of theophylline were studied in 9 healthy volunteers (Ex I). Subjects were intravenously administered either six 4.8 mg/kg theophylline (Theodrip, Nikken Chemicals Co., Ltd., Japan) or three matching placebo injections (4.8 ml/kg physiological saline) for 30 min (Step I) or for 15 min (Step II). In Steps I and II, Cmax was 10.8 +/- 1.1 and 10.8 +/- 0.8 micrograms/ml, respectively. These Cmaxs were concentrations yielding therapeutic effects in patients with acute asthma. Next, comparative pharmacokinetics between theophylline (Theodrip) and aminophylline were examined by a crossover method in 16 healthy volunteers (Ex II). The 90% confidence limits of the differences of mean values were within 80-120% and were 92.8-100.1% for Cmax, 99.7-105.3% for t1/2 and 100.2-104.4% for AUC. Thus, we concluded that the pharmacokinetics of the plasma theophylline after intravenous administration of Theodrip (theophylline at 4.8 mg/kg) were bioequivalent to those of aminophylline (6.0 mg/kg) for 30 min. In Ex I and II, no subjects had adverse effects and in Ex I no influence on ECG was seen. In addition, the convenience of Theodrip was compared with that of ampules of aminophylline among nurse volunteers (Ex III). The times required for set-up of Theodrip were significantly shorter than those of aminophylline ampules. On the other hand, the adverse reactions to aminophylline resulting from hypersensitivity reactions to its ethylenediamine component have been reported. Theodrip consists of 200 mg theophylline and 200 ml physiological saline in a plastic bag. Therefore, Theodrip, which does not contain ethylenediamine, is expected to have less adverse effects and be easier to handle than aminophylline.
在9名健康志愿者中研究了静脉输注速度对茶碱药代动力学的影响(实验I)。受试者静脉注射6次4.8mg/kg茶碱(Theodrip,日本日研化学株式会社)或3次匹配的安慰剂注射(4.8ml/kg生理盐水),持续30分钟(步骤I)或15分钟(步骤II)。在步骤I和II中,Cmax分别为10.8±1.1和10.8±0.8μg/ml。这些Cmax是急性哮喘患者产生治疗效果的浓度。接下来,在16名健康志愿者中通过交叉方法研究了茶碱(Theodrip)和氨茶碱之间的比较药代动力学(实验II)。平均值差异的90%置信区间在80-120%以内,Cmax为92.8-100.1%,t1/2为99.7-105.3%,AUC为100.2-104.4%。因此,我们得出结论,静脉注射Theodrip(4.8mg/kg茶碱)后血浆茶碱的药代动力学与氨茶碱(6.0mg/kg)静脉注射30分钟的药代动力学具有生物等效性。在实验I和II中,没有受试者出现不良反应,在实验I中未观察到对心电图的影响。此外,在护士志愿者中比较了Theodrip与氨茶碱安瓿的便利性(实验III)。设置Theodrip所需的时间明显短于氨茶碱安瓿。另一方面,已经报道了因对氨茶碱乙二胺成分过敏反应而导致的不良反应。Theodrip由一个塑料袋中的200mg茶碱和200ml生理盐水组成。因此,不含乙二胺的Theodrip预计不良反应较少,且比氨茶碱更易于操作。