• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于最少先验知识的类别学习。

Category learning with minimal prior knowledge.

作者信息

Kaplan A S, Murphy G L

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 Jul;26(4):829-46. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.26.4.829.

DOI:10.1037//0278-7393.26.4.829
PMID:10946366
Abstract

In 6 experiments, the authors examined the use of prior knowledge in category learning. Previous studies of the effects of knowledge on category learning have used categories in which knowledge was related to all of the category's features. However, people's knowledge of real-world categories often consists of many "rote" features that are not related to their prior knowledge. Five experiments found that even minimal prior knowledge (1 knowledge-relevant feature and 5 rote features per exemplar) can facilitate category learning. Posttests revealed that although the knowledge aided learning, subjects also acquired the rote features that were not related to knowledge, contradicting predictions of an attentional explanation of the knowledge effect. The results of Experiment 6 suggested that subjects attempt to link even rote features to their knowledge.

摘要

在6项实验中,作者研究了先验知识在类别学习中的运用。先前关于知识对类别学习影响的研究使用的类别中,知识与该类别的所有特征相关。然而,人们对现实世界类别的知识通常包含许多与先验知识无关的“死记硬背”特征。五项实验发现,即使是极少的先验知识(每个示例有1个与知识相关的特征和5个死记硬背的特征)也能促进类别学习。后测表明,虽然知识有助于学习,但受试者也习得了与知识无关的死记硬背特征,这与对知识效应的注意力解释的预测相矛盾。实验6的结果表明,受试者甚至试图将死记硬背的特征与他们的知识联系起来。

相似文献

1
Category learning with minimal prior knowledge.基于最少先验知识的类别学习。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 Jul;26(4):829-46. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.26.4.829.
2
The acquisition of category structure in unsupervised learning.无监督学习中类别结构的习得。
Mem Cognit. 1999 Jul;27(4):699-712. doi: 10.3758/bf03211563.
3
What is learned in knowledge-related categories? Evidence from typicality and feature frequency judgments.在与知识相关的类别中学到了什么?来自典型性和特征频率判断的证据。
Mem Cognit. 1999 Sep;27(5):856-67. doi: 10.3758/bf03198538.
4
Modeling the effects of prior knowledge on learning incongruent features of category members.模拟先验知识对类别成员不一致特征学习的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Sep;30(5):1065-81. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.5.1065.
5
Learning about the internal structure of categories through classification and feature inference.通过分类和特征推理了解类别的内部结构。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(9):1786-807. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.871567. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
6
Distributional expectations and the induction of category structure.分布期望与类别结构的诱导
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1986 Apr;12(2):241-56. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.12.2.241.
7
Feature distribution and background knowledge in category learning.类别学习中的特征分布与背景知识
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2000 Nov;53(4):962-82. doi: 10.1080/713755932.
8
Attentional Bias in Human Category Learning: The Case of Deep Learning.人类类别学习中的注意偏向:深度学习的案例
Front Psychol. 2018 Apr 13;9:374. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00374. eCollection 2018.
9
The role of functional form in causal-based categorization.功能形式在基于因果关系的分类中的作用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 May;41(3):670-92. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000048. Epub 2014 Aug 11.
10
Prior knowledge and subtyping effects in children's category learning.儿童类别学习中的先验知识和亚型效应
Cognition. 2003 Jun;88(2):171-99. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(03)00021-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Individual differences in working memory impact the trajectory of non-native speech category learning.工作记忆的个体差异会影响非母语者言语范畴学习的轨迹。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 10;19(6):e0297917. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297917. eCollection 2024.
2
Searching for Category-Consistent Features: A Computational Approach to Understanding Visual Category Representation.寻找类别一致特征:一种理解视觉类别表征的计算方法。
Psychol Sci. 2016 Jun;27(6):870-84. doi: 10.1177/0956797616640237. Epub 2016 May 3.
3
Observation versus classification in supervised category learning.
监督式类别学习中的观察与分类
Mem Cognit. 2015 Feb;43(2):266-82. doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0458-2.
4
Artificial grammar learning of melody is constrained by melodic inconsistency: Narmour's principles affect melodic learning.旋律的人工语法学习受到旋律不一致性的限制:纳摩尔原则影响旋律学习。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 9;8(7):e66174. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066174. Print 2013.
5
How prior knowledge affects selective attention during category learning: an eyetracking study.先前知识如何影响类别学习中的选择性注意:一项眼动研究。
Mem Cognit. 2011 May;39(4):649-65. doi: 10.3758/s13421-010-0050-3.
6
Category vs. Object Knowledge in Category-based Induction.基于类别的归纳中类别知识与客体知识的比较
J Mem Lang. 2010 Jul 1;63(1):1-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.12.002.
7
Prior knowledge enhances the category dimensionality effect.先验知识增强了类别维度效应。
Mem Cognit. 2008 Mar;36(2):256-70. doi: 10.3758/mc.36.2.256.
8
Blocking in category learning.类别学习中的阻断效应
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2007 Nov;136(4):685-99. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.685.
9
Subtyping as a knowledge preservation strategy in category learning.作为类别学习中知识保存策略的子类型划分
Mem Cognit. 2007 Apr;35(3):432-43. doi: 10.3758/bf03193283.
10
The science of cycology: failures to understand how everyday objects work.自行车学:对日常物品工作原理的理解不足。
Mem Cognit. 2006 Dec;34(8):1667-75. doi: 10.3758/bf03195929.