• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Can continuous quality improvement be assessed using randomized trials? [see comment].能否使用随机试验来评估持续质量改进?[见评论]
Health Serv Res. 2000 Aug;35(3):687-700.
2
Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.六西格玛:并非胆小者所能驾驭。
Radiol Manage. 2003 Mar-Apr;25(2):40-53.
3
The search for value: a quality improvement cycle linking process, outcomes, and patient satisfaction.价值探寻:连接过程、结果与患者满意度的质量改进循环。
J Health Adm Educ. 1994 Winter;12(1):29-38.
4
Using routine data to complement and enhance the results of randomised controlled trials.利用常规数据补充并强化随机对照试验的结果。
Health Technol Assess. 2000;4(22):1-55.
5
Overview of studies of treatments for hand eczema-the EDEN hand eczema survey.手部湿疹治疗研究概述——伊登手部湿疹调查
Br J Dermatol. 2004 Aug;151(2):446-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2004.06040.x.
6
Design of cluster-randomized trials of quality improvement interventions aimed at medical care providers.针对医疗服务提供者的质量改进干预措施的整群随机试验设计。
Med Care. 2007 Oct;45(10 Supl 2):S38-43. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318070c0a0.
7
[Interventions to improve the management of diabetes mellitus in primary health care and outpatient community settings].[改善初级卫生保健和门诊社区环境中糖尿病管理的干预措施]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2002 Jan 28;164(5):607-9.
8
Atrial fibrillation and stroke prevention.心房颤动与卒中预防
Expert Rev Neurother. 2006 Oct;6(10):1523-30. doi: 10.1586/14737175.6.10.1523.
9
A Bayesian approach to evaluating net clinical benefit allowed for parameter uncertainty.一种用于评估净临床效益的贝叶斯方法考虑了参数不确定性。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Jan;58(1):26-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.03.015.
10
Industrial models of continuous quality improvement. Implications for emergency medicine.持续质量改进的行业模式。对急诊医学的启示。
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1992 Aug;10(3):523-47.

引用本文的文献

1
Hypertension Improvement Project (HIP): study protocol and implementation challenges.高血压改善项目(HIP):研究方案与实施挑战
Trials. 2009 Feb 26;10:13. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-13.
2
Translating evidence-based falls prevention into clinical practice in nursing facilities: Results and lessons from a quality improvement collaborative.将基于证据的跌倒预防措施应用于护理机构的临床实践:质量改进协作的结果与经验教训。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 Sep;54(9):1414-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00853.x.
3
Patterns of medical and nursing staff communication in nursing homes: implications and insights from complexity science.养老院医护人员沟通模式:复杂性科学的启示与见解
Qual Health Res. 2006 Feb;16(2):173-88. doi: 10.1177/1049732305284734.
4
An educational intervention to enhance nurse leaders' perceptions of patient safety culture.一项旨在增强护士领导者对患者安全文化认知的教育干预措施。
Health Serv Res. 2005 Aug;40(4):997-1020. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00401.x.
5
Quality improvement implementation in the nursing home.疗养院的质量改进实施
Health Serv Res. 2003 Feb;38(1 Pt 1):65-83. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.00105.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality of anticoagulation management among patients with atrial fibrillation: results of a review of medical records from 2 communities.心房颤动患者抗凝管理质量:来自两个社区病历审查的结果
Arch Intern Med. 2000 Apr 10;160(7):967-73. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.7.967.
2
Assessing the impact of continuous quality improvement on clinical practice: what it will take to accelerate progress.评估持续质量改进对临床实践的影响:加速进展所需的条件。
Milbank Q. 1998;76(4):593-624, 510. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00107.
3
Continuous quality improvement in primary care: what's happening?初级保健中的持续质量改进:现状如何?
Med Care. 1998 May;36(5):625-35. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199805000-00003.
4
How do we really know that we are improving quality?我们究竟如何才能知道我们正在提高质量呢?
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1996 Nov;22(11):719-20. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30277-2.
5
Use of experimental and quasi-experimental methods for data-based decisions in QI.在质量改进中使用实验性和准实验性方法进行基于数据的决策。
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1995 Dec;21(12):683-91. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30196-1.
6
A primer on leading the improvement of systems.引领系统改进的入门指南。
BMJ. 1996 Mar 9;312(7031):619-22. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7031.619.
7
The critical path method in stroke rehabilitation: lessons from an experiment in cost containment and outcome improvement.中风康复中的关键路径法:成本控制与改善结局实验的经验教训。
QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1993 Jan;19(1):8-16. doi: 10.1016/s0097-5990(16)30582-6.
8
Stages of change and decisional balance for 12 problem behaviors.12种问题行为的改变阶段与决策平衡
Health Psychol. 1994 Jan;13(1):39-46. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.13.1.39.
9
Choosing the correct unit of analysis in Medical Care experiments.在医疗保健实验中选择正确的分析单位。
Med Care. 1984 Dec;22(12):1101-14. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198412000-00005.

能否使用随机试验来评估持续质量改进?[见评论]

Can continuous quality improvement be assessed using randomized trials? [see comment].

作者信息

Samsa G, Matchar D

机构信息

Center for Clinical Health Policy Research, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27705, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2000 Aug;35(3):687-700.

PMID:10966090
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1089142/
Abstract

STUDY QUESTION

Continuous quality improvement (CQI) has been implemented at least to some degree in many health care settings, yet randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of CQI are rare. We ask whether, when, and how RCTs of CQI might be designed.

STUDY DESIGN

We consider two applications of CQI: as a general philosophy of management and (by analogy with the use of conceptual models from the behavioral sciences) as a conceptual model for developing specific interventions. The example of warfarin therapy for stroke prevention among patients with atrial fibrillation is used throughout.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

While it is impractical to use RCTs to study CQI as a general management philosophy, RCT methodology is appropriate for studying CQI as a conceptual model for generating interventions. RCTs of CQI might be considered when the process change under consideration is very large, its implications (e.g., in terms of cost, outcomes of care, etc.) are very great, and the best approach is uncertain. When designing RCTs of CQI, critical decisions include (1) the unit of randomization; (2) whether the focus is on CQI as a method for generating interventions or, instead, is on specific interventions in and of themselves; and (3) the flexibility available to local personnel to modify the intervention's operational details.

CONCLUSIONS

RCTs of CQI as a conceptual model for generating interventions are feasible.

摘要

研究问题

持续质量改进(CQI)已在许多医疗环境中至少在一定程度上得到实施,但针对CQI的随机对照试验(RCT)却很少见。我们探讨CQI的随机对照试验是否、何时以及如何设计。

研究设计

我们考虑CQI的两种应用:作为一种一般的管理理念,以及(类比行为科学中概念模型的使用方式)作为开发特定干预措施的概念模型。全文以华法林治疗心房颤动患者预防中风为例。

主要发现

虽然使用随机对照试验来研究作为一般管理理念的CQI不切实际,但随机对照试验方法适用于研究作为生成干预措施概念模型的CQI。当所考虑的过程变化非常大、其影响(如成本、护理结果等方面)非常大且最佳方法不确定时,可考虑进行CQI的随机对照试验。设计CQI的随机对照试验时,关键决策包括:(1)随机化单位;(2)重点是将CQI作为生成干预措施的方法,还是仅关注特定干预措施本身;(3)当地人员修改干预措施操作细节的灵活性。

结论

将CQI作为生成干预措施的概念模型进行随机对照试验是可行的。