Samsa G, Matchar D
Center for Clinical Health Policy Research, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27705, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2000 Aug;35(3):687-700.
Continuous quality improvement (CQI) has been implemented at least to some degree in many health care settings, yet randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of CQI are rare. We ask whether, when, and how RCTs of CQI might be designed.
We consider two applications of CQI: as a general philosophy of management and (by analogy with the use of conceptual models from the behavioral sciences) as a conceptual model for developing specific interventions. The example of warfarin therapy for stroke prevention among patients with atrial fibrillation is used throughout.
While it is impractical to use RCTs to study CQI as a general management philosophy, RCT methodology is appropriate for studying CQI as a conceptual model for generating interventions. RCTs of CQI might be considered when the process change under consideration is very large, its implications (e.g., in terms of cost, outcomes of care, etc.) are very great, and the best approach is uncertain. When designing RCTs of CQI, critical decisions include (1) the unit of randomization; (2) whether the focus is on CQI as a method for generating interventions or, instead, is on specific interventions in and of themselves; and (3) the flexibility available to local personnel to modify the intervention's operational details.
RCTs of CQI as a conceptual model for generating interventions are feasible.
持续质量改进(CQI)已在许多医疗环境中至少在一定程度上得到实施,但针对CQI的随机对照试验(RCT)却很少见。我们探讨CQI的随机对照试验是否、何时以及如何设计。
我们考虑CQI的两种应用:作为一种一般的管理理念,以及(类比行为科学中概念模型的使用方式)作为开发特定干预措施的概念模型。全文以华法林治疗心房颤动患者预防中风为例。
虽然使用随机对照试验来研究作为一般管理理念的CQI不切实际,但随机对照试验方法适用于研究作为生成干预措施概念模型的CQI。当所考虑的过程变化非常大、其影响(如成本、护理结果等方面)非常大且最佳方法不确定时,可考虑进行CQI的随机对照试验。设计CQI的随机对照试验时,关键决策包括:(1)随机化单位;(2)重点是将CQI作为生成干预措施的方法,还是仅关注特定干预措施本身;(3)当地人员修改干预措施操作细节的灵活性。
将CQI作为生成干预措施的概念模型进行随机对照试验是可行的。