• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在不考虑伙伴行为的情况下解决合作任务:卷尾猴(僧帽猴)的案例。

Solving a cooperation task without taking into account the partner's behavior: the case of capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

作者信息

Visalberghi Elisabetta, Quarantotti Benedetta Pellegrini, Tranchida Flaminia

机构信息

Istituto di Psicologia del Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche.

出版信息

J Comp Psychol. 2000 Sep;114(3):297-301. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.114.3.297.

DOI:10.1037/0735-7036.114.3.297
PMID:10994846
Abstract

Four pairs of tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) were tested in a task requiring that both partners pull a handle simultaneously in order for both to be rewarded. The experimental design, an improved version of that of R. Chalmeau, E. Visalberghi, and A. Gallo (1997), aimed at assessing the extent to which a monkey that is pulling takes account of the behavior and spatial position of its partner, that is, whether the monkey understands what cooperation involves. Although all pairs succeeded, pulling was not affected by the partner's behavior, and it was affected only to a certain extent by the partner's spatial position. In addition, more experienced capuchins did not outperform naive individuals. The finding that capuchins were successful without understanding the role of the partner suggests that their cooperation is not cognitively grounded, as has been argued in descriptions of the hunting behavior of wild capuchins.

摘要

四对簇绒卷尾猴(僧帽猴)接受了一项任务测试,该任务要求两只猴子同时拉动把手,这样它们俩才能都得到奖励。实验设计是R. 沙尔莫、E. 维萨尔贝吉和A. 加洛(1997年)实验设计的改进版本,目的是评估正在拉动把手的猴子在多大程度上会考虑其伙伴的行为和空间位置,也就是说,这只猴子是否理解合作的内涵。尽管所有的猴子对都成功完成了任务,但拉动行为不受伙伴行为的影响,仅在一定程度上受伙伴空间位置的影响。此外,经验更丰富的卷尾猴并没有比没有经验的个体表现得更好。卷尾猴在不理解伙伴角色的情况下就能成功完成任务,这一发现表明它们的合作并非基于认知,就像在对野生卷尾猴狩猎行为的描述中所论证的那样。

相似文献

1
Solving a cooperation task without taking into account the partner's behavior: the case of capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).在不考虑伙伴行为的情况下解决合作任务:卷尾猴(僧帽猴)的案例。
J Comp Psychol. 2000 Sep;114(3):297-301. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.114.3.297.
2
Cooperative problem solving by tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella): spontaneous division of labor, communication, and reciprocal altruism.簇绒卷尾猴(僧帽猴)的合作性问题解决:自发分工、沟通与互惠利他行为
J Comp Psychol. 2005 Aug;119(3):335-42. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.119.3.335.
3
Capuchins do cooperate: the advantage of an intuitive task.卷尾猴确实会合作:一项直观任务的优势。
Anim Behav. 2000 Oct;60(4):523-529. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1512.
4
Partner's behavior, not reward distribution, determines success in an unequal cooperative task in capuchin monkeys.卷尾猴在不平等合作任务中的成功取决于伙伴的行为,而非奖励分配。
Am J Primatol. 2006 Jul;68(7):713-24. doi: 10.1002/ajp.20261.
5
Capuchin monkeys, Cebus apella fail to understand a cooperative task.卷尾猴(僧帽猴)无法理解合作任务。
Anim Behav. 1997 Nov;54(5):1215-25. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0517.
6
Why some capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) use probing tools (and others do not).为什么一些卷尾猴(白喉卷尾猴)会使用探测工具(而其他卷尾猴不会)。
J Comp Psychol. 1998 Jun;112(2):207-11. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.112.2.207.
7
Lateral bias for rotational behavior in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).簇绒卷尾猴(僧帽猴属)旋转行为的侧向偏好
J Comp Psychol. 1996 Jun;110(2):199-202. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.110.2.199.
8
How do tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) understand causality involved in tool use?簇绒卷尾猴(僧帽猴)如何理解工具使用中涉及的因果关系?
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2003 Jul;29(3):233-42. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.29.3.233.
9
Lack of comprehension of cause-effect relations in tool-using capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).卷尾猴(僧帽猴)在使用工具时对因果关系缺乏理解。
J Comp Psychol. 1994 Mar;108(1):15-22. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.108.1.15.
10
Transport of tools to food sites in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).簇绒卷尾猴(僧帽猴属)将工具运输到食物地点的行为
Anim Cogn. 2004 Jul;7(3):193-8. doi: 10.1007/s10071-004-0213-3. Epub 2004 Mar 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Evidence for socially influenced and potentially actively coordinated cooperation by bumblebees.熊蜂存在受社会影响且可能积极协调合作的证据。
Proc Biol Sci. 2024 May;291(2022):20240055. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2024.0055. Epub 2024 May 1.
2
Dogs take into account the actions of a human partner in a cooperative task.狗在合作任务中会考虑人类伙伴的行为。
Proc Biol Sci. 2023 Feb 22;290(1993):20222189. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2022.2189. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
3
The Joint Log-Lift Task: A Social Foraging Paradigm.联合原木提升任务:一种社会觅食范式。
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Oct 11;8:745627. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.745627. eCollection 2021.
4
Evidence that bottlenose dolphins can communicate with vocal signals to solve a cooperative task.宽吻海豚能够通过声音信号进行交流以解决合作任务的证据。
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Mar 17;8(3):202073. doi: 10.1098/rsos.202073.
5
Kea, Nestor notabilis, achieve cooperation in dyads, triads, and tetrads when dominants show restraint.当优势个体表现出克制时,黄眼企鹅(Nestor notabilis)在对偶、三元和四联体中实现了合作。
Learn Behav. 2021 Mar;49(1):36-53. doi: 10.3758/s13420-021-00462-9. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
6
Bottlenose dolphins can understand their partner's role in a cooperative task.宽吻海豚能够理解其在合作任务中伙伴的角色。
Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Sep 19;285(1887):20180948. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2018.0948.
7
Kea cooperate better with sharing affiliates.kea与共享附属机构合作得更好。 (注:这里kea可能是某个特定名称,在医学语境外单纯从英文看不太明确其准确指代,不过按照要求进行了字面翻译)
Anim Cogn. 2016 Nov;19(6):1093-1102. doi: 10.1007/s10071-016-1017-y. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
8
Chimpanzees do not take advantage of very low cost opportunities to deliver food to unrelated group members.黑猩猩不会利用成本极低的机会为非亲属群体成员提供食物。
Anim Behav. 2008 May 1;75(5):1757-1770. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.09.036.
9
Functional analysis of mutual behavior in laboratory rats (Rattus norvegicus).实验室大鼠(褐家鼠)相互行为的功能分析
J Comp Psychol. 2016 Feb;130(1):13-23. doi: 10.1037/com0000015. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
10
Tolerance and reward equity predict cooperation in ravens (Corvus corax).宽容和奖励公平性预示着渡鸦(鸦属)的合作行为。
Sci Rep. 2015 Oct 7;5:15021. doi: 10.1038/srep15021.