Suppr超能文献

腰椎小关节神经阻滞联合或不联合辅助药物的诊断有效性和治疗价值。

The diagnostic validity and therapeutic value of lumbar facet joint nerve blocks with or without adjuvant agents.

作者信息

Manchikanti L, Pampati V, Fellows B, Bakhit C E

机构信息

Pain Management Center, 2831 Lone Oak Road, Paducah, KY 42003, USA.

出版信息

Curr Rev Pain. 2000;4(5):337-44. doi: 10.1007/s11916-000-0016-4.

Abstract

Facet joints have been described as an important source of low back pain. The value of medial branch blocks in the diagnosis of facet joint mediated pain is considered important. However, the therapeutic value of medial branch blocks has not been determined. This study was designed to evaluate the duration of relief obtained and therapeutic value following controlled medial branch blocks with or without adjuvant agents Sarapin (High Chemical Company, Levittown, PA) and Depo-medrol (Pharmacia and Upjohn Company, Kalamazoo, MI). The study population consisted of 180 consecutive patients seen in a single pain management practice, divided into three groups with 60 patients in each group. Group I was treated with local anesthetic only, Group II with the addition of Sarapin, and Group III with the addition of Depo-medrol along with Sarapin. The prevalence of facet joint pain in chronic low back pain was determined as 36%, with a false-positive rate of 25%. Comparison of duration of relief in days with each block in the three groups showed that the relief was significantly superior in Group III compared with Group I and Group II, whereas Group II was superior to Group I.

摘要

小关节已被描述为下腰痛的一个重要来源。内侧支阻滞在诊断小关节介导性疼痛中的价值被认为很重要。然而,内侧支阻滞的治疗价值尚未确定。本研究旨在评估使用或不使用辅助药物Sarapin(高化学公司,宾夕法尼亚州莱维敦)和得宝松(辉瑞公司,密歇根州卡拉马祖)进行可控内侧支阻滞后获得的缓解持续时间和治疗价值。研究人群包括在单一疼痛管理诊所连续就诊的180例患者,分为三组,每组60例。第一组仅用局部麻醉剂治疗,第二组加用Sarapin,第三组加用得宝松和Sarapin。慢性下腰痛中小关节疼痛的患病率为36%,假阳性率为25%。三组中每组每次阻滞缓解天数的比较表明,第三组的缓解明显优于第一组和第二组,而第二组优于第一组。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验