Stenström C H, Hellström S, Hultgren M, Wikström M
Department of Physical Therapy, Karolinska institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.
Scand J Rheumatol. 2000;29(4):243-8. doi: 10.1080/030097400750041398.
The aim of the study was to investigate the reliability and the validity of a Swedish version of the Revised Leeds Disability Questionnaire (RLDQ). Forty-two patients, 36 men and 6 women, median age 52.5 years, median symptom duration 24 years, with spondylarthropathy were assessed with the RLDQ, three questions on the content of the questionnaire, and range-of-motion measures. The results indicated satisfactory test-retest stability and internal consistency, and only minor internal redundancy. RLDQ items were generally considered relevant and suggested additions were similar to items already included in the questionnaire. Patients with low disability scores tended to be older and have better joint mobility than those with higher scores. Physiotherapists observed and scored disability significantly higher than patients. Correlations between subscores of the RLDQ and range-of-motion measures were in the main weak. In conclusion the Swedish version of the RLDQ may be considered as reliable and valid.
本研究的目的是调查瑞典语版修订版利兹残疾问卷(RLDQ)的信度和效度。对42例患有脊椎关节病的患者进行了评估,其中男性36例,女性6例,年龄中位数为52.5岁,症状持续时间中位数为24年,评估内容包括RLDQ、关于问卷内容的三个问题以及活动范围测量。结果表明,该问卷具有令人满意的重测稳定性和内部一致性,且内部冗余度较小。RLDQ项目总体上被认为是相关的,建议增加的项目与问卷中已有的项目相似。残疾得分低的患者往往比得分高的患者年龄更大且关节活动度更好。物理治疗师观察到的残疾情况并给出的评分明显高于患者。RLDQ各子分数与活动范围测量之间的相关性总体较弱。总之,瑞典语版的RLDQ可被认为是可靠且有效的。